Pengaruh Sibling Relationship Terhadap Kesejahteraan Psikologis Peserta Didik SMA Negeri dJakarta Barat
Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui perbedaan pengaruh pada dimensi sibling relationship (warmth, relative power, conflict dan rivalry) terhadap kesejahteraan psikologis peserta didik SMA Negeri di Jakarta Barat. Pendekatan yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini ialah pendekatan kuantitatif dengan jenis korelasional. Sampel yaitu 356 peserta didik SMA Negeri di Jakarta Barat (132 laki-laki dan 224 perempuan), usia 15-17 tahun, memiliki saudara kandung. Penentuan sampel menggunakan teknik multistage random sampling. Pengumpulan data menggunakan angket adaptasi, Sibling Relatonship Questionnaire (SRQ) yang disusun oleh Furman dan Buhrmester (1990) sebanyak 48 item dan Scale of Psychological Well-Being (SPWB) milik Ryff (1989) sebanyak 84 item. Uji validitas menggunakan expert judgement dan uji coba instrumen dengan rumus Person’s Product Moment. Uji reliabilitas menggunakan rumus Alpha Cronbach dengan SPSS v.25, diperoleh koefisien reliabilitas SRQ sebesar 0,916 dan SPWB sebesar 0,669. Teknik analisis data menggunakan Pearson’s Product Moment dan hipotesisnya diuji dengan One-Way ANOVA menggunakan program SPSS v.25. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa dimensi warmth berpengaruh secara positif terhadap kesejahteraan psikologis peserta didik (0,178 > 0,05), dimensi relative power berpengaruh secara positif terhadap kesejahteraan psikologis peserta didik (0,109 > 0,05), dimensi conflict berpengaruh secara negatif terhadap kesejahteraan psikologis peserta didik (-0,105 > 0,05) dan dimensi rivalry memiliki pengaruh negatif terhadap kesejahteraan psikologis peserta didik (-0,114 > 0,05). Hasil uji hipotesis ANOVA menunjukkan bahwa Fhitung > Ftabel atau 4,786 > 2,39, dengan demikian sibling relationship secara keseluruhan memiliki pengaruh yang berbeda terhadap kesejahteraan psikologis peserta didik SMA Negeri di Jakarta Barat. Namun, berdasarkan hasil Pearson Correlation dibandingkan dengan tabel koefisien korelasi, didapati bahwa pengaruh yang terjadi dari masing-masing dimensi pada sibling relationship terhadap kesejahteraan psikologis peserta didik sangat rendah. Uji Tukey HSD juga menunjukkan bahwa hanya dimensi rivalry yang memiliki pengaruh berbeda dengan ketiga dimensi lainnya (warmth, relative power, conflict) terhadap kesejahteraan psikologis peserta didik SMA Negeri di Jakarta Barat.
This study aims to determine the difference in affect of dimensions of sibling relationship (warmth, relative power, conflict and rivalry) on psychological well-being in senior high school students at West Jakarta. Suggestions used in this research are quantitative with correlational type. The samples were 356 high school students at West Jakarta (132 males and 224 females), age 15-17, has sibling. Determination of the sample multistage random sampling technique. Data collected by forms of an questionnaire which adapted, that is Sibling Relationship Questionnaire (SRQ) organized by Furman and Buhrmester (1990) amount 48 items, and Scale of Psychological Well-Being (SPWB) by Ryff (1989) amount 84 items. Validity test uses expert judgement and instrument testing with the Pearson’s Product Moment. Realibility test using the Cronbach Alpha with SPSS v.25 obtained the reliability coefficient SRQ is 0,916 and SPWB is 0.669. Data analyzed using Pearson’s Product Moment and the hypothesis was tested by One-Way ANOVA with SPSS v.25. The results showed that warmth dimension had a positive effect on psychological well-being of students (0,178 > 0,05), relative power dimension had a positive effect on psychological well-being of students (0,109 > 0,05), conflict dimension had a negative effect on psychological well-being of students (- 0,105 > 0,05), and rivalry dimension had a negative effect on psychological well-being of students (-0,114 > 0,05). Hypothesis test by ANOVA results that Fcount > Ftable or 4,786 > 2,39, means sibling relationship has a different effect on psychological well-being in senior high school students at West Jakarta. However, based on the results of Pearson Correlation compared to the correlational coefficient table, was found that the effect of each diomension of sibling relationship on psychological well-being of students was very low. Tukey HSD test also shows that only rivalry dimension has a different effect from the other three dimensions (warmth, relative power, conflict) on psychlogicall well-being in senior high school students at West Jakarta.
References
Alkema, N. L. (2013). Associations between sibling relationship quality and emotional competence in middle childhood. California State University.
Azmitia, M., & Hesser, J. (1993). Why Siblings Are Important Agents of Cognitive Development: A Comparison of Siblings and Peers. Child Development, 64(2), 430–444. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1993.tb02919.x
Brody, G. H. (1998). SIBLING RELATIONSHIP QUALITY: Its Causes and Consequences. Annual Review of Psychology, 49(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.1
Buhrmester, D., & Furman, W. (1990). Perceptions of Sibling Relationships during Middle Childhood and Adolescence. Child Development, 61(5), 1387–1398. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1990.tb02869.x
Cicirelli, V. G. (1973). Effects of sibling structure and interaction on children’s categorization style. Developmental Psychology, 9(1), 132–139. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0035061
Cicirelli, V. G. (1995). Sibling Relationships Across the Life Span (1 ed.). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-6509-0
Fahmi, U. N., & Handayani, M. M. (2018). Hubungan antara dimensi sibling relationship dengan psychological well-being pada remaja yang memiliki saudara. Jurnal Psikologi Pendidikan dan Perkembangan, 7, 39–46.
Fardiyanti, A. (2017). Pengaruh sibling rivalry terhadap hubungan teman sebaya (Skripsi). UMM Institutional Repository.
Furman, W., & Buhrmester, D. (1985). Children’s Perceptions of the Qualities of Sibling Relationships. Child Development, 56(2), 448–461. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1985.tb00119.x
J. Kelly McCoy, Gene H. Brody, & Zolinda Stoneman. (2002). Temperament and the Quality of Best Friendships: Effect of Same-Sex Sibling Relationships. Family Relations, 51(3), 248–255.
Kamaluddin, H. (2011). Bimbingan dan Konseling Sekolah. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 17(4), 447. https://doi.org/10.24832/jpnk.v17i4.40
Kavcic, T., & Zupancic, M. (2011). Sibling Relationship and Personality in Early/Middle Childhood From Parent’S Perception. Suvremena Psihologija, 14(2), 119–133.
Kim, J.-Y., McHale, S. M., Crouter, A. C., & Osgood, D. W. (2007). Longitudinal linkages between sibling relationships and adjustment from middle childhood through adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 43(4), 960–973. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.4.960
Leung, A. K. D., & Robson, W. L. M. (1991). Sibling Rivalry. Clinical Pediatrics, 30(5), 314–317. https://doi.org/10.1177/000992289103000510
Lindell, A. K., & Campione-Barr, N. (2017). Relative Power in Sibling Relationships Across Adolescence. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2017(156), 49–66. https://doi.org/10.1002/cad.20201
Marotta, A. K. (2015). The Relationship between Sibling Relationship Quality and Psychological Outcomes in Emerging Adulthood (Tesis) [Columbia University]. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.7916/D85T3JRG
Menesini, E., Camodeca, M., & Nocentini, A. (2010). Bullying among siblings: The role of personality and relational variables. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 28(4), 921–939. https://doi.org/10.1348/026151009X479402
Milevsky, A. (2019). Parental Factors, Psychological Well-Being, and Sibling Dynamics: A Mediational Model in Emerging Adulthood. Marriage & Family Review, 55(5), 476–492. https://doi.org/10.1080/01494929.2018.1518822
Naretey, S. (2013). Perception of Stigma on the Psychological Well-Being of Siblings of Children with Intellectual Disability (Nomor 10169371). University of Ghana.
Nastasi, B., & Borja, A. P. (2016). International Handbook of Psychological Well-Being in Children and Adolescents. In B. K. Nastasi & A. P. Borja (Ed.), International Handbook of Psychological Well-Being in Children and Adolescents. Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2833-0
Paula, T. S. (2012). Resilience and the role of sibling relationships among children within homeless families. In Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering (Vol. 72, Nomor 8-B). University of Miami.
Pertiwi, R. G., & NRH, F. (2019). Hubungan Antara Sibling Rivalry Dengan Psychological Well-Being Pada Siswa Kelas Vii Smp Negeri 12 Semarang. Empati, 7(4), 143–151.
Prabowo, A. (2016). KESEJAHTERAAN PSIKOLOGIS REMAJA DI SEKOLAH. JIPT, 4(2), 246–260. https://doi.org/10.22219/jipt.v4i2.3527
Ramadhani, T., Djunaedi, D., & Sismiati S., A. (2016). KESEJAHTERAAN PSIKOLOGIS (PSYCHOLOGICAL WELL-BEING) SISWA YANG ORANGTUANYA BERCERAI (Studi Deskriptif yang Dilakukan pada Siswa di SMK Negeri 26 Pembangunan Jakarta). INSIGHT: JURNAL BIMBINGAN KONSELING, 5(1), 108. https://doi.org/10.21009/INSIGHT.051.16
Riska, H. A., Krisnatuti, D., & Yuliati, L. N. (2018). Pengaruh Interaksi Remaja dengan Keluarga dan Teman serta Self-Esteem terhadap Perilaku Prososial Remaja Awal. Jurnal Ilmu Keluarga dan Konsumen, 11(3), 206–218. https://doi.org/10.24156/jikk.2018.11.3.206
Roja, N. M. (2013). Hubungan Sibling Relationships Dengan Perilaku Delinkuensi Pada Remaja di SMAN 7 Banda Aceh. UNIVERSITAS SYIAH KUALA.
Ryff, C. D. (1995). Psychological Well-Being in Adult Life. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 4(4), 99–104. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.ep10772395
Sanders, R. (2004). Sibling Relationships. In J. Campling (Ed.), Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling. Macmillan Education UK. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-20306-8
Saputro, K. Z. (2018). Memahami Ciri dan Tugas Perkembangan Masa Remaja. Aplikasia: Jurnal Aplikasi Ilmu-ilmu Agama, 17(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.14421/aplikasia.v17i1.1362
Savitri, W. C., & Listiyandini, R. A. (2017). Mindfulness dan Kesejahteraan Psikologis pada Remaja. Psikohumaniora: Jurnal Penelitian Psikologi, 2(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.21580/pjpp.v2i1.1323
Sherman, A. M., Lansford, J. E., & Volling, B. L. (2006). Sibling relationships and best friendships in young adulthood: Warmth, conflict, and well-being. In Personal Relationships. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2006.00110.x
Stoneman, Z., & Brody, G. H. (1993). Sibling Temperaments, Conflict, Warmth, and Role Asymmetry. Child Development, 64(6), 1786–1800. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1993.tb04213.x
Stormshak, E. A., Bullock, B. M., & Falkenstein, C. A. (2009). Harnessing the power of sibling relationships as a tool for optimizing social-emotional development. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2009(126), 61–77. https://doi.org/10.1002/cd.257
Sugiyatno. (2014). Standar kompetensi kemandirian. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.
Thomas, P. A., Liu, H., & Umberson, D. (2017). Family Relationships and Well-Being. Innovation in Aging, 1(3). https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igx025
Van Langeveld, A. D. C. (2010). Sibling Relationships, Stress, and Well-Being During Early Adolescence. Brigham Young University.
Yanuari, T., & Rahmasari, D. (2011). Hubungan antara sibling rivalry dengan stres pada anak. Jurnal Psikologi Teori dan Terapan, 2(1), 46. https://doi.org/10.26740/jptt.v2n1.p46-57
Authors who publish with this Journal agree to the following terms:
- Author retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a creative commons attribution licensethat allow others to share the work within an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication of this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangementfor the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g. acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal).
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online(e.g. in institutional repositories or on their websites) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published works.
Users/public use of this website will be licensed to CC BY
