Religious Hybridity of Asian Diaspora: A Postcolonial Criticism on The Buddha of Suburbia and Anita and Me

Authors

  • Yusri Fajar Universitas Brawijaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21009/Arif.022.10

Keywords:

Asian British Fiction, Cultural Hybridity, Hindu, Islam

Abstract

This article investigated the negotiation of Islamic and Hindu beliefs held by South Asian immigrants in British society, which resulted in religious hybridity as depicted in two diasporic fictions, The Buddha of Suburbia by Hanif Kureishi and Anita and Me by Meera Syal. This was a qualitative study. Data was collected through document studies of the two novels. The data were then analyzed using content analysis techniques in conjunction with cultural hybridity theory. The findings indicated that the religious practices of the British Asian diaspora were ambiguous. On the one hand, they continued to practice Islam and Hinduism, while on the other, they attempted to reconcile their religious beliefs with the religious, social, and cultural aspects of British society.

References

Attar, S. M. (2017). Female friendship and Family Relationships in Meera Syal’s Life Isn’t All Ha Ha Hee Hee. Research Journal of English Language and Literature (RJELAL) A Peer Reviewed (Refereed) International Journal Impact Factor, 5(3), 651–653. http://www.rjelal.com.
Bhabha, H. K. (1995). Sign Taken for Wonders. In B. Ashcroft, G. Griffiths, & H. Tiffin (Eds.), The Post-colonial Studies Reader (pp. 29–35). London and New York: Routledge.
Boehmer, E. (2005). Colonial and Postcolonial Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Brown, J. M. (2006). Global South Asians: Introducing the Modern Diaspora. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Cornelle, C. (2021). Religious Hybridity and Christian Identity: Promise and Problem. http://currentsjournal.org/index.php/currents/article/view/283.
Gilbert, B. M. (2001). Hanif Kureishi. Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press.
Hall, S. (1995). Cultural Identity and Diaspora. In J. Rutherfold (Ed.), Identity: Community, Culture, Difference (pp. 435–439). Lawrence and Wishart.
Knott, K. (2000). Hinduism in Britain. In The South Asian Religious Diaspora in Britain, Canada and the United States (pp. 89–107). Albany: State University of New York.
Kureishi, H. (1990). The Buddha of Suburbia. London: Faber and Faber.
Mahto, -Mohan Lal. (2016). Cultural Conflicts and Hyphenated Existence in Meera Syal’s Anita and Me. In Ars Artium: An International Peer Reviewed-cum-Refereed Research Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences ISSN (Vol. 4).
Messaoudi, W., & Al-Khawaldeh, S. (2022). The Dysfunctional Father in Hanif Kureishi’s Novel The Buddha of Suburbia. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 12(7), 1313–1319. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1207.10.
Modood, T., Beishon, S., & Virdee, S. (1994). Changing ethnic identities. London: Policy Studies Institute.
Nielsen, J. S. (2000). Muslims in Britain Ethnic Minorities, Community, or Ummah? In H. Coward, J. R. Hinnells, & R. B. Williams (Eds.), The South Asian Religious Diaspora in Britain, Canada and the United States (pp. 109–125). Albany: State University of New York.
Qaradawi, S. Y. al. (1997). The Lawful and Prohibited in Islam. Cairo: Al Falah Foundation. Qibtiyah, A. (2015). Homosexuality, Islam and Human Rights Perspectives. Musâwa, 14(2),
197–209. http://www.queerjihad.org.
Ranasinha, R. (2007). South Asian Writers in Twentieth Century Britain: Culture in
Translation. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Selkli, A., & Supit, I. (2021). Indian-British: Dilemma of Karim’s World in The Novel The Buddha of Suburbia By Hanif Kureishi. LINGUAMEDIA Journal, 2(1), 1–14. http://jurnal.untagsmg.ac.id/index.php/linguamedia/article/view/2292.
Syal, M. (1997). Anita and Me. London: Flamingo.
Young, R. (1995). Colonial Desire: Hybridity in Theory, Culture and Race. London and
New York: Routledge.

Downloads

Published

2023-02-28

How to Cite

Fajar, Y. (2023). Religious Hybridity of Asian Diaspora: A Postcolonial Criticism on The Buddha of Suburbia and Anita and Me. Arif: Jurnal Sastra Dan Kearifan Lokal, 2(2), 367–380. https://doi.org/10.21009/Arif.022.10