PENDIDIKAN MULTI BUDAYA DALAM PEMBANGUNAN INDONESIA BERKELANJUTAN MENCIPTAKAN KEHIDUPAN EKONOMI MASYARAKAT INDONESIA MAKMUR DAN SEJAHTERA
Keywords:
Teoekologi, Ekososialisme, Ekonomi Mikro Ramah LingkunganAbstract
Nature, its protection and preservation, must be a limitation for all aspects of human life; ranging from education, and politics to economics and even all human behavior. If human behavior violates or exceeds the boundaries of nature, in the sense of not caring about the preservation and preservation of nature and even destroying nature, this will have a bad impact on humans themselves. As in Marxism, the metabolic rift between man and nature will confuse man. Ecosocialism promoted by Marxists focuses on protecting nature through the most destructive sektor of nature, namely, the capitalist economy. Therefore, this paper will analyze the extent to which the values embodied by ecosocialists in the discourse of an environmentally friendly economy are not capital-based. This discourse is felt to be very close to the realization of microeconomic development, especially traditionalist ones, so how the ecosocialist value of developing microeconomics will be the main point in this research. In addition, this study will analyze religious values (which is meant by this article is Islam) to be an ecosocialist justification for microeconomic development, considering that religion wants the welfare of its people and a good economic sistem and religion is very concerned about the environment.
Abstrak
Alam harus menjadi batasan kehidupan manusia –perlindungan dan pelestariannya– mulai dari sektor pendidikan, politik, ekonomi hingga seluruh aspek kehidupan lainnya. Bilamana perilaku manusi tidak peduli terhadap batasan ini (alam) –tidak menjaga dan melestarikannya bahkan merusaknya– akan berdampak buruk bagi manusia itu sendiri. Sebagaimana dalam Marxisme diungkapkan, bahwa keretakan metabolisme antara manusia dan alam akan merusak (mengacaukan) manusia. Ekososialisme yang diusung Kaum Marxis, berfokus pada perlindungan alam dengan menyorot masalah paling krusial dalam hal ini yaitu, ekonomi kapitalis. Oleh karena itu, tulisan ini akan menganalisis sejauh mana nilai-nilai yang diwadahi oleh ekososialis dalam wacana ekonomi berbasis ramah lingkungan yang bebas dari ekonomi kapital. Wacana ekososialis ini dirasa sangat dekat dengan pengembangan usaha ekonomi mikro atau yang disebut UMKM, sehingga bagaimana nilai ekososialis dalam upaya pengembangan ekonomi mikro (khususnya yang tradisionalis) akan menjadi poin utama pada tulisan ini. Selain itu, tulisan ini juga akan mengkaji nilai-nilai agama (dalam hal ini yang dimaksud adalah Islam) sebagai justifikasi terhadap ekosoialis dalam pembangunan UNKM, mengingat agama memiliki spirit untuk kesejahteraan umat dan sistem ekonomi yang baik, pun agama begitu peduli terhadap alam.
References
Adang, C. (2019). Islam as the inborn religion of mankind: The concept of fiṭra in the works of Ibn Ḥazm. Al-Qanṭara, 21(2), 391.
Al-Bukhari, A. A. M. b. I. (2002). Shahih Bukhari (Juz 8). Dar Ibn Kasir.
Al-Hajjaj, A. A.-H. M. b. (1991). Shahih Muslim. Dar al-Kutub.
Al-Thabariy, I. (n.d.). Al-Kabiir (Hadis No. 4596).
Alvim, R. G., de Oliveira, M. M., & Castellanos, H. G. (2020). Global social change: Human ecology from an eco-ethical perspective. In Global changes (pp. 121–130). Springer.
Asyur, M. T. b. (1984). Al-Tahrir wa al-Tanwir (Vol. 8). Dar al-Tunisiyah.
Becker, C. D., & Ghimere, K. (2003). Synergy between traditional ecological knowledge and conservation science supports forest preservation in Ecuador. Concervation Ecology, 8(1), 1–12.
Berkes, F., & Hunt, I. J. D. (2004). Bioversity, traditional management sistem, and cultural landscapes: Examples from the boreal forest of Canada. International Sosial Science Journal, 58(8), 35–47.
Bram, D. (2014). Hukum lingkungan hidup omo ethic-eco ethic. Gramata Publishing.
Dimyanti, K., & Wardiono, K. (2004). Metode penelitian hukum (Buku pegangan kuliah). UMS.
Foster, J. B., dkk. (2021). Marxisme dan ekologi kumpulan wawancara (F. F. Izzati, Trans.). Pustaka IndoPROGRESS.
Galbraith, H., & Burger, J. (1993). A paradigm of ecological risk assessment. Environmental Management, 17(1), 1–5.
Graves, S., & Waddock, S. (1999). Institutional owners and corporate social responsibility. Social Review and Management Journal, 37.
Hamidi. (2010). Metode penelitian kualitatif. UMM Press.
Jumu'ah, A. (2009). Al-biah wa al-hifadz ‘alayha min mandhurin islamiyyin (Cet. I). Alwabell.
Kedia, B., & Kuntz, E. (1981). The context of social performance: An empirical study of Texas banks. In Research in corporate social performance and policy. JAI Press.
Kozai, T., & Niu, G. (2020). Role of the plant factory with artificial lighting (PFAL) in urban areas. In Plant factory (pp. 7–34). Academic Press.
Kramer. (2007). Financial and stock market variables as predictors of management buyouts. Strategic Management Journal, 8(4), 319–327.
Larsen, R. S. (1993). The challenge of change: Building a new competitive spirit for the 21st century. Executive Speeches, 7(3), 19–22.
Lawson, J., & Kingsley, J. (2020). The language of Australian human-ecological relationship: Identity, place, and landscape. In Handbook of the changing world language map (pp. 3333–3347).
Meyer, M., & Zucker, L. (1989). Permanently failing organizations. Sage Publications.
Prastowo, A. (2010). Menguasai teknik-teknik koleksi data penelitian kualitatif. Diva Press.
Reksohadiprojo, S. B. (2000). Ekonomi lingkungan (2nd ed.). BPFE Yogyakarta.
Singh, K. (2020). Tracing environmental ethics in the HolyQur’an. Studies in Indian Place Names, 40(1), 1519–1523.
Sugiyono. (2011). Metode penelitian kuantitatif kualitatif dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Sunggono, B. (2007). Metodelogi penelitian hukum. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Zed, M. (2008). Metode penelitian kepustakaan. Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Faiqil Faqih
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
