Fun and E-learning (A Hybrid Teaching Factory Model)
Perspectives on Methods and Media for Generation Z Students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21009/ISC-BEAM.011.52Keywords:
E-learning, Generation Z, Hybrid Teaching, Fun Learning, Student Center, Teaching FactoryAbstract
Educators must possess the capacity to create engaging instructional sessions that are tailored to specific time periods and generational attributes. This study explores the concept of an engaging educational setting within the context of the generation Z period. Furthermore, technological advancements have offered individuals supplementary prospects to cultivate and nurture social connections in what is commonly referred to as e-learning. Classroom management encompasses the coordination of classroom activities to enhance learning, along with the teacher's proficiency in creating an optimal learning environment through the use of technology, in line with the demands of the digital era, to address any challenges that arise during the learning process. The primary objectives of utilizing (digital) technology in classroom management are to enhance the learning quality and maximize the overall learning experience (e-learning). Attaining educational objectives is essential for guaranteeing the excellence of the learning process. Classroom management abilities encompass educators' capacity to effectively establish and sustain an ideal educational setting by adeptly employing technology in accordance with contemporary trends and the distinctive learning attributes of Generation Z students. Efficiently managing the teaching and learning process requires a systematic approach that encompasses tasks such as planning, organizing, controlling, and supervision. These actions are conducted concurrently, thoroughly, and in an integrated manner. A learning approach using technology carried out in a hybrid according to the teaching factory concept is a good solution for achieving learning objectives.
References
Adjei, J. K., Adams, S., & Mamattah, L. (2021). Cloud computing adoption in Ghana; accountingfor institutional factors. Technology in Society, 65, 101583. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TECHSOC.2021.101583
Akbas, O. dan Pektas, H. M. (2013) The Effects of Using an Interactive Whiteboard on The AcademicAchievement of University Students. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching Journal. 12(2): 45-54.
Andersson, P., & Mattsson, L. G. (2021). Future digitalization of education after COVID-19.Режим доступа: https://www.hhs.se/contentassets/419c7b2f06a94ee183bf52ca748c98b5/a54. pdf.
Anton Nasrullah (2017), Implementasi Pendekatan Pembelajaran Aktif, Kreatif, Efektif Dan Menyenangkan Ditinjau Dari Hasil Belajar [Implementation of an active, creative, effective and enjoyable learning approach in terms of learning outcomes]. UNION jurnal Pendidikan matematikaAris Shoimin (2014) 68 Model pembelajaran Inovatif Dalam Kurikulum 2013[68 Innovative learning models in the Curriculum 2013], Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media.
Arsyad, Azhar. (2011) Media Pembelajaran[Learning Media]. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.Asmani, J. M. (2010). 7 Tips Aplikasi PAIKEM (Pembelajaran Aktif, Kreatif, Efektif, dan menyenangkan) [7 AICEF Application Tips (Active, Creative, Effective and Fun Learning)]. Jogjakarta: Diva Pers.
Backfisch, I., Lachner, A., Hische, C., Loose, F., & Scheiter, K. (2020). Professional knowledge or motivation? Investigating the role of teachers’expertise on the quality of technology-enhanced lesson plans.Learning and instruction,66, 101300.
Backfisch, I., Lachner, A., Stürmer, K., & Scheiter, K. (2021). Variability of teachers’ technology integration in the classroom: A matter of utility!.Computers & Education,166, 104159.
Baumert, J., & Kunter, M. (2013). Professionelle Kompetenz von Lehrkräften[Professional competence of teachers].Stichwort: Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 277-337.
Caison, A. L., Bulman, D., Pai, S., & Neville, D.(2008). Exploring the technology readiness of nursing and medical students at a Canadian University. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 22(3), 283–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820802061809
Cavanagh, R. F., & Koehler, M. J. (2013). A turn toward specifying validity criteria in the measurement of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK).Journal of Research on Technology in Education,46(2), 129-148.
Chryssolouris, G., Mavrikios, D., & Rentzos, L. (2016). The teaching factory: a manufacturing education paradigm.Procedia Cirp,57, 44-48.
Chryssolouris, G., Mavrikios, D., Papakostas, N., & Mourtzis, D. (2006, August). Education in manufacturing technology & science: A view on future challenges & goals. InProceedings of the International Conference on Manufacturing Science and Technology Inaugural Keynote, Melaka, Malaysia(pp. 1-4).
Dexter, S., Richardson, J. W., & Nash, J. B. (2016). A review of the empirical research and implications for leadership preparation.Handbook of research on the education of school leaders, 202-228.
Djamarah, S. B., & Zain, A. 2013. Strategi Belajar Mengajar[Teaching and Learning Strategies]. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Farjon, D., Smits, A., & Voogt, J. (2019). Technology integration of pre-service teachers explained by attitudes and beliefs, competency, access, and experience.Computers & Education,130, 81-93.
Fathurohman, Pupuh. (2009). Strategi Belajar Mengajar Melalui Penanaman Konsep Umum dan Konsep Islami[Teaching and Learning Strategy Through Instilling General Concepts and Islamic Concepts]. Bandung: Refika Aditama.
Fithriyah, K., Arif, M., & Ningsih, P. R. (2019). Pengaruh Model Experiential Learning Terhadap Motivasi Dan Hasil Belajar Siswa Pada Mata Pelajaran Simulasi Digital Di Smk Negeri 2 Bangkalan [The Influence of the Experiential Learning Model on Student Motivation and Learning Outcomes in Digital Simulation Subjects at SMK Negeri 2 Bangkalan].Jurnal Ilmiah Edutic: Pendidikan dan Informatika,6(1), 39-45.
Fourtané, S. (2021). Future of Higher Education: Automation to Better Assist Instructors. Fierce Education. https://www.fierceeducation.com/technology/future-higher-educationautomation-better-assist-instructors
Fourtané, S. (2022). Preparing for the University of the Future. Fierce Education. https://www.fierceeducation.com/technology/preparing-university-future.
Fuetterer, T., Scheiter, K., Cheng, X., & Stuermer, K. (2022). Quality beats frequency? Investigating students’ effort in learning when introducing technology in classrooms.Contemporary Educational Psychology,69, 102042.
Herawati, Kuswari. (2012). Pemanfaatan Sumber Belajar Internet Berbasis Edutainment dalam Pembelajaran Matematika Siswa Sekolah Dasar[Utilization of Edutainment-Based Internet Learning Resources in Elementary School Students' Mathematics Learning]. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika 2012.
Hillmayr, D., Ziernwald, L., Reinhold, F., Hofer, S. I., & Reiss, K. M. (2020). The potential of digital tools to enhance mathematics and science learning in secondary schools: A context-specific meta-analysis.Computers & Education,153, 103897.
Isjoni. (2010). Cooperative Learning Efektivitas Pembelajaran Kelompok[Cooperative Learning Effectiveness of Group Learning]. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Jang, M., Aavakare, M., Nikou, S., & Kim, S. (2021). The impact of literacy on intention to use digital technology for learning: A comparative study of Korea and Finland. Telecommunications Policy, 45(7), 102154. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TELPOL.2021.102154
Jauhar, Muhammad. (2011). Implementasi PAIKEM dari Behavioristik sampai Konstruktivistik Sebuah Pengenmbangan Pembelajaran Berbasis CTL (Contextual Teaching & Learning)[Implementation of PIKEM from Behavioristic to Constructivist A Development of CTL (Contextual Teaching & Learning) Based Learning]. Jakarta: Prestasi Pustakaraya.
Kartini, T. (2007). Penggunaan metode role playing untuk meningkatkan minat siswa dalam pembelajaran pengetahuan sosial di kelas V SDN Cileunyi I Kecamatan Cileunyi Kabupaten Bandung[Using the role playing method to increase students' interest in learning social knowledge in class V of SDN Cileunyi I, Cileunyi District, Bandung Regency]. Jurnal pendidikan dasar, 8(1), 16-17.
Keengwe, J., Onchwari, G., & Wachira, P. (2008). Computer technology integration and student learning: Barriers and promise.Journal of science education and technology,17, 560-565.
Kiryakova, A. V, Tretiakov, A. N., Kolga, V. V, Piralova, O. F., & Dzhamalova, B. B. (2016). Experimental Study of the Effectiveness of College Students’ Vocational Training in Conditions of Social Partnership. IEJME. 11(3); 457-466.
Kolb, D. A. (2014).Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. FT press.
Kopcha, T. J., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A., Jung, J., & Baser, D. (2014). Examining the TPACK framework through the convergent and discriminant validity of two measures.Computers & Education,78, 87-96.
Lancaster, L., & Stillman, D. (2002). When generations collide. New York: Harper Collins.Lie, A. (2005). Cooperative Learning: Mempraktikkan Cooperative Learning di Ruang-ruang Kelas[Cooperative Learning: Practicing Cooperative Learning in Classrooms]. Jakarta, Indonesia: Grasindo.
Madan, K., & Yadav, R. (2018). Understanding and predicting antecedents of mobile shopping adoption: A developing country perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 30(1), 139–162. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-02-2017-0023
Majid, A. 2016. Strategi Pembelajaran [Learning strategies]. Bandung:Remaja Rosdakarya.Mavrikios, D., Georgoulias, K., & Chryssolouris, G. (2018). The teaching factory paradigm: Developments and outlook.Procedia Manufacturing,23, 1-6.
Mavrikios, D., Papakostas, N., Mourtzis, D., & Chryssolouris, G. (2013). On industrial learning and training for the factories of the future: a conceptual, cognitive and technology framework.Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing,24, 473-485.
Meenakumari, J. (2021). Digital Twins in Education –an Insight. Times of India. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/readersblog/education-insights/digital-twins-in-education-an-insight-38045/
Misnah, M. 2020. DesainPembelajaran Problem Based Learning Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Mahasiswa Pada Mata Kuliah Pendidikan IPS Di Universitas Tadulako[Problem Based Learning Learning Design to Improve Student Learning Outcomes in Social Sciences Education Courses at Tadulako University]. Nosarara: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Ilmu Sosial, 8(1), 15-22.
Mourtzis, D., Vlachou, E., Dimitrakopoulos, G., & Zogopoulos, V. (2018). Cyber-physical systems and education 4.0–the teaching factory 4.0 concept.Procedia manufacturing,23, 129-134.
Mulyasa, E. (2007). Standar Kompetensi dan Sertifikasi Guru[Competency Standards and Teacher Certification]. Bandung: PT Rosdakarya.
Munif, I. R. S. (2009). Penerapan Metode Experiential Learning Pada Pembelajaran Ipa Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa Sekolah Dasar[Application of Experiential Learning Methods in Science Learning to Improve Primary School Student Learning Outcomes].Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia,5(2).
Nurdyansyah, N., & Fahyuni, E. F. (2016). Inovasi model pembelajaran sesuai kurikulum 2013 [Innovation in learning models according to the curriculum2013]. Sidoarjo: UMSIDA.
Primavera, Ika Risqi Citra. (2014). Penggunaan Media Audio-Visual (video) Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa Kelas XI Pada Konsep Elastisitas[Use of Audio-Visual Media (video) on Class XI Student Learning Outcomes on the Concept of Elasticity]. Jurnal FITK UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta. 14(5): 122-129.
Purwono, Joni. 2014. Penggunaan Media Audio-Visual pada Mata Pelajaran Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam di Sekolah Menengah Pertama Negeri 1 Pacitan [Use of Audio-Visual Media in Natural Science Subjects at State Middle School 1 Pacitan]. Jurnal FKIP UNS. 2(2): 127-144.
Rifqiyana, L., & Susilo, B. E. (2016). Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Kelas VIII dengan Pembelajaran Model 4K Ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif Siswa [Analysis of Class VIII Students' Critical Thinking Ability with 4K Model Learning in View of Students' Cognitive Style]. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education. 5(2); 09-117
Rudhito, M. A., & Prasetyo, D.A. B. (2016). Pengembangan Soal Matematika Model TIMSS untuk Mendukung Pembelajaran Matematika SMP Kelas VII Kurikulum 2013[Development of TIMSS Model Mathematics Questions to Support Middle School Mathematics Learning for Class VII Curriculum 2013]. Cakrawala Kependidikan. 1 (1); 88-97.
Rüßmann, M., Lorenz, M., Gerbert, P., Waldner, M., Justus, J., Engel, P., & Harnisch, M. (2015). Industry 4.0: The future of productivity and growth in manufacturing industries.Boston consulting group,9(1), 54-89.
Sagala, Syaiful, (2010). Konsep dan Makna Pembelajaran[Concept and Meaning of Learning]. Bandung: Al-Fabeta.
Sakti, Indra. 2013. Pengaruh Media Animasi Fisika Dalam Model Pembelajaran Langsung (Direct Instruction) Terhadap Minat Belajar dan Pemahaman Konsep Fisika Siswa diSMA Negeri Kota Bengkulu[The Influence of Physics Animation Media in the Direct Instruction Model on Students' Interest in Learning and Understanding of Physics Concepts at State High Schools in Bengkulu City]. Prosiding Semirata FMIPA Unila. 1(1) (2013): 493-498.
Saptaningrum, E & Kusdaryani, W. (2010). Model PAIKEM melalui Pendekatan Tematik untuk Pembelajaran Sains SD [AICEF Model through a Thematic Approach for Elementary Science Learning]. Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran Fisika (JP2F).1(1); 92-104
Setyowati, R. D. N., Amala, N. A., & Aini, N. N. U. (2017). Studi pemilihan tanaman revegetasi untuk keberhasilan reklamasi lahan bekas tambang[Study of selection of revegetation plants for successful reclamation of ex-mining land]. Al-Ard: Jurnal Teknik Lingkungan, 3(1), 14-20.
Stavropoulos, P., & Mourtzis, D. (2022). Digital twins in industry 4.0. In Design and Operation of Production Networks for Mass Personalization in the Era of Cloud Technology(pp. 277–316). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-823657-4.00010-5
Stavropoulos, P., Bikas, H., & Mourtzis, D. (2018). Collaborative machine tool design: The teaching factory paradigm.Procedia manufacturing,23, 123-128.
Supriadi, N., & Damayanti, R. (2016). Analisis kemampuan komunikasi matematis siswa lamban belajar dalam menyelesaikan soal bangun datar [Analysis of students' mathematical communication skills who are slow learners in solving flat shape problems]. Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 7(1), 1-9.
Suryantini, N. L. I., & Ardana, I. K. (2020). Model Experiential Learning Berbantuan Video Berpengaruh Terhadap Kompetensi Pengetahuan IPA[Video-Assisted Experiential Learning Model Influences Science Knowledge Competency].Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies,3(2), 329-337.
Tamim, R. M., Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Abrami, P. C., & Schmid, R. F. (2011). What forty years of research says about the impact of technology on learning: A second-order meta-analysis and validation study.Review of Educational research,81(1), 4-28.
Uno, H. B., & Mohamad, N. (2022). Belajar dengan pendekatan PAILKEM: pembelajaran aktif, inovatif, lingkungan, kreatif, efektif, menarik [Learning with the AIECEF approach: active, innovative, environmental, creative, effective, interesting learning]. Bumi Aksara.
Untayana, J. R., & Harta, I. (2016). Pengembangan perangkat pembelajaran limit berbasis pendekatan saintifik berorientasi prestasi belajar dan kemampuan komunikasi matematika [Development of limit learning tools based on a scientific approach oriented towards learning achievement and mathematical communication skills]. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 3(1), 45-54.
von Kotzebue, L. (2022). Beliefs, Self-reported or Performance-Assessed TPACK: What Can Predict the Quality of Technology-Enhanced Biology Lesson Plans?.Journal of Science Education and Technology,31(5), 570-582.
Wangi, S. R., Winarti, E. R., & Kharis, M. (2016). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran CTL dengan Strategi React untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar dan Kedisiplinan Siswa Pada Materi Geometri [Application of the CTL Learning Model with React Strategy to Improve Learning Outcomes and Student Discipline in Geometry Lesson]. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education, 5(1).
Waskito, D. (2014). Media Pembelajaran Interaktif Matematika Bagi Sekolah Dasar Kelas 6 Berbasis Multimedia[Interactive Mathematics Learning Media for Grade 6 Elementary Schools Based on Multimedia]. Speed Journal-Sentra Penelitian Engineering Dan Edukasi, 11(3), 59-65.
Wekerle, C., Daumiller, M., & Kollar, I. (2022). Using digital technology to promote higher education learning: The importance of different learning activities and their relations to learning outcomes.Journal of Research on Technology in Education,54(1), 1-17.
Winatha, K. R., & Setiawan, I. M. D. (2020). Pengaruh game-based learning terhadap motivasi dan prestasi belajar [The influence of game-based learning on motivation and learning achievement]. Scholaria: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 10(3), 198-206.
Zhou, X., Chen, L. H., & Chen, C. L. (2019). Collaborative learning by teaching: A pedagogy between learner-centered and learner-driven.Sustainability,11(4), 1174.
Akbas, O. dan Pektas, H. M. (2013) The Effects of Using an Interactive Whiteboard on The AcademicAchievement of University Students. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching Journal. 12(2): 45-54.
Andersson, P., & Mattsson, L. G. (2021). Future digitalization of education after COVID-19.Режим доступа: https://www.hhs.se/contentassets/419c7b2f06a94ee183bf52ca748c98b5/a54. pdf.
Anton Nasrullah (2017), Implementasi Pendekatan Pembelajaran Aktif, Kreatif, Efektif Dan Menyenangkan Ditinjau Dari Hasil Belajar [Implementation of an active, creative, effective and enjoyable learning approach in terms of learning outcomes]. UNION jurnal Pendidikan matematikaAris Shoimin (2014) 68 Model pembelajaran Inovatif Dalam Kurikulum 2013[68 Innovative learning models in the Curriculum 2013], Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media.
Arsyad, Azhar. (2011) Media Pembelajaran[Learning Media]. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.Asmani, J. M. (2010). 7 Tips Aplikasi PAIKEM (Pembelajaran Aktif, Kreatif, Efektif, dan menyenangkan) [7 AICEF Application Tips (Active, Creative, Effective and Fun Learning)]. Jogjakarta: Diva Pers.
Backfisch, I., Lachner, A., Hische, C., Loose, F., & Scheiter, K. (2020). Professional knowledge or motivation? Investigating the role of teachers’expertise on the quality of technology-enhanced lesson plans.Learning and instruction,66, 101300.
Backfisch, I., Lachner, A., Stürmer, K., & Scheiter, K. (2021). Variability of teachers’ technology integration in the classroom: A matter of utility!.Computers & Education,166, 104159.
Baumert, J., & Kunter, M. (2013). Professionelle Kompetenz von Lehrkräften[Professional competence of teachers].Stichwort: Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 277-337.
Caison, A. L., Bulman, D., Pai, S., & Neville, D.(2008). Exploring the technology readiness of nursing and medical students at a Canadian University. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 22(3), 283–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820802061809
Cavanagh, R. F., & Koehler, M. J. (2013). A turn toward specifying validity criteria in the measurement of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK).Journal of Research on Technology in Education,46(2), 129-148.
Chryssolouris, G., Mavrikios, D., & Rentzos, L. (2016). The teaching factory: a manufacturing education paradigm.Procedia Cirp,57, 44-48.
Chryssolouris, G., Mavrikios, D., Papakostas, N., & Mourtzis, D. (2006, August). Education in manufacturing technology & science: A view on future challenges & goals. InProceedings of the International Conference on Manufacturing Science and Technology Inaugural Keynote, Melaka, Malaysia(pp. 1-4).
Dexter, S., Richardson, J. W., & Nash, J. B. (2016). A review of the empirical research and implications for leadership preparation.Handbook of research on the education of school leaders, 202-228.
Djamarah, S. B., & Zain, A. 2013. Strategi Belajar Mengajar[Teaching and Learning Strategies]. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Farjon, D., Smits, A., & Voogt, J. (2019). Technology integration of pre-service teachers explained by attitudes and beliefs, competency, access, and experience.Computers & Education,130, 81-93.
Fathurohman, Pupuh. (2009). Strategi Belajar Mengajar Melalui Penanaman Konsep Umum dan Konsep Islami[Teaching and Learning Strategy Through Instilling General Concepts and Islamic Concepts]. Bandung: Refika Aditama.
Fithriyah, K., Arif, M., & Ningsih, P. R. (2019). Pengaruh Model Experiential Learning Terhadap Motivasi Dan Hasil Belajar Siswa Pada Mata Pelajaran Simulasi Digital Di Smk Negeri 2 Bangkalan [The Influence of the Experiential Learning Model on Student Motivation and Learning Outcomes in Digital Simulation Subjects at SMK Negeri 2 Bangkalan].Jurnal Ilmiah Edutic: Pendidikan dan Informatika,6(1), 39-45.
Fourtané, S. (2021). Future of Higher Education: Automation to Better Assist Instructors. Fierce Education. https://www.fierceeducation.com/technology/future-higher-educationautomation-better-assist-instructors
Fourtané, S. (2022). Preparing for the University of the Future. Fierce Education. https://www.fierceeducation.com/technology/preparing-university-future.
Fuetterer, T., Scheiter, K., Cheng, X., & Stuermer, K. (2022). Quality beats frequency? Investigating students’ effort in learning when introducing technology in classrooms.Contemporary Educational Psychology,69, 102042.
Herawati, Kuswari. (2012). Pemanfaatan Sumber Belajar Internet Berbasis Edutainment dalam Pembelajaran Matematika Siswa Sekolah Dasar[Utilization of Edutainment-Based Internet Learning Resources in Elementary School Students' Mathematics Learning]. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika 2012.
Hillmayr, D., Ziernwald, L., Reinhold, F., Hofer, S. I., & Reiss, K. M. (2020). The potential of digital tools to enhance mathematics and science learning in secondary schools: A context-specific meta-analysis.Computers & Education,153, 103897.
Isjoni. (2010). Cooperative Learning Efektivitas Pembelajaran Kelompok[Cooperative Learning Effectiveness of Group Learning]. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Jang, M., Aavakare, M., Nikou, S., & Kim, S. (2021). The impact of literacy on intention to use digital technology for learning: A comparative study of Korea and Finland. Telecommunications Policy, 45(7), 102154. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TELPOL.2021.102154
Jauhar, Muhammad. (2011). Implementasi PAIKEM dari Behavioristik sampai Konstruktivistik Sebuah Pengenmbangan Pembelajaran Berbasis CTL (Contextual Teaching & Learning)[Implementation of PIKEM from Behavioristic to Constructivist A Development of CTL (Contextual Teaching & Learning) Based Learning]. Jakarta: Prestasi Pustakaraya.
Kartini, T. (2007). Penggunaan metode role playing untuk meningkatkan minat siswa dalam pembelajaran pengetahuan sosial di kelas V SDN Cileunyi I Kecamatan Cileunyi Kabupaten Bandung[Using the role playing method to increase students' interest in learning social knowledge in class V of SDN Cileunyi I, Cileunyi District, Bandung Regency]. Jurnal pendidikan dasar, 8(1), 16-17.
Keengwe, J., Onchwari, G., & Wachira, P. (2008). Computer technology integration and student learning: Barriers and promise.Journal of science education and technology,17, 560-565.
Kiryakova, A. V, Tretiakov, A. N., Kolga, V. V, Piralova, O. F., & Dzhamalova, B. B. (2016). Experimental Study of the Effectiveness of College Students’ Vocational Training in Conditions of Social Partnership. IEJME. 11(3); 457-466.
Kolb, D. A. (2014).Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. FT press.
Kopcha, T. J., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A., Jung, J., & Baser, D. (2014). Examining the TPACK framework through the convergent and discriminant validity of two measures.Computers & Education,78, 87-96.
Lancaster, L., & Stillman, D. (2002). When generations collide. New York: Harper Collins.Lie, A. (2005). Cooperative Learning: Mempraktikkan Cooperative Learning di Ruang-ruang Kelas[Cooperative Learning: Practicing Cooperative Learning in Classrooms]. Jakarta, Indonesia: Grasindo.
Madan, K., & Yadav, R. (2018). Understanding and predicting antecedents of mobile shopping adoption: A developing country perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 30(1), 139–162. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-02-2017-0023
Majid, A. 2016. Strategi Pembelajaran [Learning strategies]. Bandung:Remaja Rosdakarya.Mavrikios, D., Georgoulias, K., & Chryssolouris, G. (2018). The teaching factory paradigm: Developments and outlook.Procedia Manufacturing,23, 1-6.
Mavrikios, D., Papakostas, N., Mourtzis, D., & Chryssolouris, G. (2013). On industrial learning and training for the factories of the future: a conceptual, cognitive and technology framework.Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing,24, 473-485.
Meenakumari, J. (2021). Digital Twins in Education –an Insight. Times of India. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/readersblog/education-insights/digital-twins-in-education-an-insight-38045/
Misnah, M. 2020. DesainPembelajaran Problem Based Learning Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Mahasiswa Pada Mata Kuliah Pendidikan IPS Di Universitas Tadulako[Problem Based Learning Learning Design to Improve Student Learning Outcomes in Social Sciences Education Courses at Tadulako University]. Nosarara: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Ilmu Sosial, 8(1), 15-22.
Mourtzis, D., Vlachou, E., Dimitrakopoulos, G., & Zogopoulos, V. (2018). Cyber-physical systems and education 4.0–the teaching factory 4.0 concept.Procedia manufacturing,23, 129-134.
Mulyasa, E. (2007). Standar Kompetensi dan Sertifikasi Guru[Competency Standards and Teacher Certification]. Bandung: PT Rosdakarya.
Munif, I. R. S. (2009). Penerapan Metode Experiential Learning Pada Pembelajaran Ipa Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa Sekolah Dasar[Application of Experiential Learning Methods in Science Learning to Improve Primary School Student Learning Outcomes].Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia,5(2).
Nurdyansyah, N., & Fahyuni, E. F. (2016). Inovasi model pembelajaran sesuai kurikulum 2013 [Innovation in learning models according to the curriculum2013]. Sidoarjo: UMSIDA.
Primavera, Ika Risqi Citra. (2014). Penggunaan Media Audio-Visual (video) Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa Kelas XI Pada Konsep Elastisitas[Use of Audio-Visual Media (video) on Class XI Student Learning Outcomes on the Concept of Elasticity]. Jurnal FITK UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta. 14(5): 122-129.
Purwono, Joni. 2014. Penggunaan Media Audio-Visual pada Mata Pelajaran Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam di Sekolah Menengah Pertama Negeri 1 Pacitan [Use of Audio-Visual Media in Natural Science Subjects at State Middle School 1 Pacitan]. Jurnal FKIP UNS. 2(2): 127-144.
Rifqiyana, L., & Susilo, B. E. (2016). Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Kelas VIII dengan Pembelajaran Model 4K Ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif Siswa [Analysis of Class VIII Students' Critical Thinking Ability with 4K Model Learning in View of Students' Cognitive Style]. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education. 5(2); 09-117
Rudhito, M. A., & Prasetyo, D.A. B. (2016). Pengembangan Soal Matematika Model TIMSS untuk Mendukung Pembelajaran Matematika SMP Kelas VII Kurikulum 2013[Development of TIMSS Model Mathematics Questions to Support Middle School Mathematics Learning for Class VII Curriculum 2013]. Cakrawala Kependidikan. 1 (1); 88-97.
Rüßmann, M., Lorenz, M., Gerbert, P., Waldner, M., Justus, J., Engel, P., & Harnisch, M. (2015). Industry 4.0: The future of productivity and growth in manufacturing industries.Boston consulting group,9(1), 54-89.
Sagala, Syaiful, (2010). Konsep dan Makna Pembelajaran[Concept and Meaning of Learning]. Bandung: Al-Fabeta.
Sakti, Indra. 2013. Pengaruh Media Animasi Fisika Dalam Model Pembelajaran Langsung (Direct Instruction) Terhadap Minat Belajar dan Pemahaman Konsep Fisika Siswa diSMA Negeri Kota Bengkulu[The Influence of Physics Animation Media in the Direct Instruction Model on Students' Interest in Learning and Understanding of Physics Concepts at State High Schools in Bengkulu City]. Prosiding Semirata FMIPA Unila. 1(1) (2013): 493-498.
Saptaningrum, E & Kusdaryani, W. (2010). Model PAIKEM melalui Pendekatan Tematik untuk Pembelajaran Sains SD [AICEF Model through a Thematic Approach for Elementary Science Learning]. Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran Fisika (JP2F).1(1); 92-104
Setyowati, R. D. N., Amala, N. A., & Aini, N. N. U. (2017). Studi pemilihan tanaman revegetasi untuk keberhasilan reklamasi lahan bekas tambang[Study of selection of revegetation plants for successful reclamation of ex-mining land]. Al-Ard: Jurnal Teknik Lingkungan, 3(1), 14-20.
Stavropoulos, P., & Mourtzis, D. (2022). Digital twins in industry 4.0. In Design and Operation of Production Networks for Mass Personalization in the Era of Cloud Technology(pp. 277–316). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-823657-4.00010-5
Stavropoulos, P., Bikas, H., & Mourtzis, D. (2018). Collaborative machine tool design: The teaching factory paradigm.Procedia manufacturing,23, 123-128.
Supriadi, N., & Damayanti, R. (2016). Analisis kemampuan komunikasi matematis siswa lamban belajar dalam menyelesaikan soal bangun datar [Analysis of students' mathematical communication skills who are slow learners in solving flat shape problems]. Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 7(1), 1-9.
Suryantini, N. L. I., & Ardana, I. K. (2020). Model Experiential Learning Berbantuan Video Berpengaruh Terhadap Kompetensi Pengetahuan IPA[Video-Assisted Experiential Learning Model Influences Science Knowledge Competency].Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies,3(2), 329-337.
Tamim, R. M., Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Abrami, P. C., & Schmid, R. F. (2011). What forty years of research says about the impact of technology on learning: A second-order meta-analysis and validation study.Review of Educational research,81(1), 4-28.
Uno, H. B., & Mohamad, N. (2022). Belajar dengan pendekatan PAILKEM: pembelajaran aktif, inovatif, lingkungan, kreatif, efektif, menarik [Learning with the AIECEF approach: active, innovative, environmental, creative, effective, interesting learning]. Bumi Aksara.
Untayana, J. R., & Harta, I. (2016). Pengembangan perangkat pembelajaran limit berbasis pendekatan saintifik berorientasi prestasi belajar dan kemampuan komunikasi matematika [Development of limit learning tools based on a scientific approach oriented towards learning achievement and mathematical communication skills]. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 3(1), 45-54.
von Kotzebue, L. (2022). Beliefs, Self-reported or Performance-Assessed TPACK: What Can Predict the Quality of Technology-Enhanced Biology Lesson Plans?.Journal of Science Education and Technology,31(5), 570-582.
Wangi, S. R., Winarti, E. R., & Kharis, M. (2016). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran CTL dengan Strategi React untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar dan Kedisiplinan Siswa Pada Materi Geometri [Application of the CTL Learning Model with React Strategy to Improve Learning Outcomes and Student Discipline in Geometry Lesson]. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education, 5(1).
Waskito, D. (2014). Media Pembelajaran Interaktif Matematika Bagi Sekolah Dasar Kelas 6 Berbasis Multimedia[Interactive Mathematics Learning Media for Grade 6 Elementary Schools Based on Multimedia]. Speed Journal-Sentra Penelitian Engineering Dan Edukasi, 11(3), 59-65.
Wekerle, C., Daumiller, M., & Kollar, I. (2022). Using digital technology to promote higher education learning: The importance of different learning activities and their relations to learning outcomes.Journal of Research on Technology in Education,54(1), 1-17.
Winatha, K. R., & Setiawan, I. M. D. (2020). Pengaruh game-based learning terhadap motivasi dan prestasi belajar [The influence of game-based learning on motivation and learning achievement]. Scholaria: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 10(3), 198-206.
Zhou, X., Chen, L. H., & Chen, C. L. (2019). Collaborative learning by teaching: A pedagogy between learner-centered and learner-driven.Sustainability,11(4), 1174.
Downloads
Published
2024-02-23
How to Cite
Nurmalasari, D., Yulia, A., & Rusni, I. M. . (2024). Fun and E-learning (A Hybrid Teaching Factory Model): Perspectives on Methods and Media for Generation Z Students. International Student Conference on Business, Education, Economics, Accounting, and Management (ISC-BEAM), 1(1), 732–752. https://doi.org/10.21009/ISC-BEAM.011.52
