Marketing, Product, and Pricing Strategies of Beverage Firms Facing Indonesia Sugar Tax

Authors

  • Purno Murtopo Kementerian Keuangan
  • Puji Wahono Universitas Negeri Jakarta
  • Indra Pahala Universitas Negeri Jakarta

Keywords:

Sweetened Beverage Excise, Industry Strategic Response, Product Reformulation, Health Policy, Marketing Strategy

Abstract

The excise policy on packaged sweetened beverages (MBDK) has been adopted globally as a public health instrument to suppress sugar consumption and encourage product reformulation. In Indonesia, the discourse on the implementation of this policy is strengthening as the prevalence of non-communicable diseases increases. Although many international studies have examined the impact of these policies on the consumer side, there is a significant research gap on the anticipatory strategic response from industry, especially in the context of developing countries. This study aims to qualitatively explore the strategic response of beverage companies in Indonesia to the MBDK excise implementation plan, focusing on the adaptation of marketing, product, and price strategies, as well as the challenges faced. This study uses a qualitative approach with multiple case study designs. Data was collected through in-depth interviews with key managers, analysis of company and media documents, and non-participant observations. Data analysis was carried out thematically using the Resource Based View (RBV) theoretical framework to interpret the findings. The results of the study identified a shift in industrial attitudes from rejection to anticipatory readiness, viewing excise as inevitable. Key strategic responses include: (1) product innovation and reformulation to reduce sugar content; (2) planning a pass-through pricing strategy that imposes excise on consumers and price differentiation to encourage healthier choices; and (3) a shift in marketing communication that emphasizes a "low-sugar" narrative. The main challenges faced are the limitations of R&D capabilities, especially for local companies, and the uncertainty of policy design from the government. Theoretically, the study integrates several frameworks to explain pre-regulatory corporate adaptation. Managerially, these findings underscore the importance of proactive investment in R&D. For policymakers, the study indicates that the industry is ready to adapt and suggests tiered levy designs to maximize policy effectiveness in driving product reformulation and achieving public health goals. This study is one of the first studies to explore the response of the beverage industry's strategy to excise policies in developing countries (Indonesia), thus filling the literature gap that has been dominated by studies in developed countries.

References

Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J. Manage., 17(1), 99–120.

Benedek, D., De Mooij, R. A., Keen, M., & Wingender, P. (2020). Varieties of {VAT} pass through. Int. Tax Publ. Fin., 27(4), 890–930.

Brulle, R., & Downie, C. (2022). Following the money: trade associations, political activity and climate change. Clim. Change, 175(3–4).

Cameron, L. (2023). Gender equality and development: Indonesia in a global context. Bull. Indones. Econ. Stud., 59(2), 179–207.

Cobiac, L. J., Rogers, N. T., Adams, J., Cummins, S., Smith, R., Mytton, O., White, M., & Scarborough, P. (2024). Impact of the {UK} soft drinks industry levy on health and health inequalities in children and adolescents in England: An interrupted time series analysis and population health modelling study. PLoS Med., 21(3), e1004371.

Collis, D. J., & Montgomery, C. A. (1995). Competing on resources: Strategy in the 1990s. Harvard Business Review, 73(4), 118–128.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among fiveapproaches. SAGE Publications.

DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Am. Sociol. Rev., 48(2), 147.

Erickson, S., & Carr, J. (2020). The technological challenges of reducing the sugar content of foods. Nutr. Bull., 45(3), 309–314.

Ge, C., Xiong, J., Zhu, R., Hong, Z., & He, Y. (2025). Global burden of high sugar-sweetened beverage consumption among young adults. Diabetol. Metab. Syndr., 17(1), 259.

Grummon, A. H., Lockwood, B. B., Taubinsky, D., & Allcott, H. (2019). Designing better sugary drink taxes. Science, 365(6457), 989–990.

Hoffmann, V. H., Trautmann, T., & Hamprecht, J. (2009). Regulatory uncertainty: A reason to postpone investments? Not necessarily. J. Manag. Stud., 46(7), 1227–1253.

Jacob, M., Müller, M. A., & Wulff, T. (2023). Do consumers pay the corporate tax? Contemp. Acc. Res.

Jawad, A., Savona, N., Penney, T. L., & White, M. (2023). Industry responses to the UK government’s public consultation on the proposed soft drinks industry levy: Qualitative documentary analysis using the framework method and a systems perspective. Food Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2023.102498

Keller, K. O., & Guyt, J. Y. (2023). A war on sugar? Effects of reduced sugar content and package size in the soda category. J. Mark., 87(5), 698–718.

Kinda, M. T., & Barry, H. (2021). Exchange rate pass‐through to import prices: Evidence from a heterogeneous panel of West African countries. Rev. Dev. Econ., 25(4), 2454–2472.

Lincoln, Y. S., Guba, E. G., & Pilotta, J. J. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Int. J. Intercult. Relat., 9(4), 438–439.

Maesarah, M., Djafar, L., & Adam, D. (2020). Diet and Incidence of Obesity in Elementary School Children in Gorontalo Regency. Ghidza, 3(2), 55–58.

Murtopo, Purno., Herlitah. (2025). Phenomenological Research Methodology. CV Literasi Nusantara.

Ng, S. W., Colchero, M. A., & White, M. (2021). How should we evaluate sweetened beverage tax policies? A review of worldwide experience. BMC Public Health, 21(1), 1941.

Oh, H.-J., Shim, J.-J., Ahn, J.-M., Oh, J.-S., & Yoon, S.-M. (2022). Multiple cerebral hemorrhages caused by paradoxical reperfusion injury after cranioplasty. Korean J. Neurotrauma, 18(2), 335–340.

Peñalvo, J. L. (2024). The impact of taxing sugar-sweetened beverages on diabetes: a critical review. Diabetologia, 67(3), 420–429.

Peters, B. G. (2022). Institutional theory. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800371972.00039

Potvin Kent, M., Pauzé, E., Guo, K., Kent, A., & Jean-Louis, R. (2020). The physical activity and nutrition-related corporate social responsibility initiatives of food and beverage companies in Canada and implications for public health. BMC Public Health, 20(1), 890.

Rasoolinejad, M. (2019). Universal Basic Income: The last bullet in the darkness.

Rebolledo, N., Ferrer-Rosende, P., Reyes, M., Smith Taillie, L., & Corvalán, C. (2025). Changes in the critical nutrient content of packaged foods and beverages after the full implementation of the Chilean Food Labelling and Advertising Law: a repeated cross-sectional study. BMC Med., 23(1), 46.

Richards, T. J., Gómez, M. I., & Lee, J. (2014). Pass‐through and consumer search: An empirical analysis. Am. J. Agric. Econ., 96(4), 1049–1069.

Rogers, N. T., Cummins, S., Forde, H., Jones, C. P., Mytton, O., Rutter, H., Sharp, S. J., Theis, D., White, M., & Adams, J. (2023). Associations between trajectories of obesity prevalence in English primary school children and the {UK} soft drinks industry levy: An interrupted time series analysis of surveillance data. PLoS Med., 20(1), e1004160.

Sarangi, S. (2018). Distribution in emerging markets: a strategic perspective. Int. J. Bus. Emerg. Mark., 10(3), 213.

Scott, W. R. (2013). Institutions and organizations: Ideas, interests, and identities. Sage publications.

Tedjasaputra, A., & Sari, E. (2015, April). {HCI} and {UX} in Indonesia. Proceedings of the {ASEAN} {CHI} Symposium’15.

van der Linden, T., & Shirazi, T. (2023). Markets in crypto-assets regulation: Does it provide legal certainty and increase adoption of crypto-assets? Financ. Innov., 9(1), 22.

Williams, S., Hill, S. E., & Oyebode, O. (2022). “Choice should be made through… educated decisions not regressive dictates”: discursive framings of a proposed “sugar tax” in Bermuda: analysis of submissions to a government consultation. Global. Health, 18(1), 89.

Wright, A., Smith, K. E., & Hellowell, M. (2017). Policy lessons from health taxes: a systematic review of empirical studies. BMC Public Health, 17(1), 583.

Yoshioka-Kobayashi, T., Miyanoshita, T., & Kanama, D. (2020). Revisiting incremental product innovations in the food-manufacturing industry: an empirical study on the effect of intellectual property rights. J. Econ. Struct., 9(1).

Downloads

Published

2025-11-29

How to Cite

Murtopo, P., Wahono, P., & Pahala, I. (2025). Marketing, Product, and Pricing Strategies of Beverage Firms Facing Indonesia Sugar Tax . International Student Conference on Business, Education, Economics, Accounting, and Management (ISC-BEAM), 4(2). Retrieved from https://journal.unj.ac.id/unj/index.php/isc-beam/article/view/61509