Analisis Penerapan SIMAPAN pada Kementerian Investasi dan Hilirisasi/BKPM
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21009/japa.0603.06Keywords:
Accounting Information System, Transparency, Accountability, SDG 16, Good GovernanceAbstract
This study aims to analyze the implementation of SIMAPAN BKPM at Ministry of Investment and Downstream and its contribution to enchance transparency, accountability, and effectiveness in state budget management as part of supporting the Sustainble Development Goals (SDGs) 16. This study used a qualitative approach with a case study method through in-depth interviews with four informants that directly involved in the budget management process, that is the Head of Finance Division, The PPSPM, the Verificator, and The Finance Administrator. The data collected through interviews, limited observation, and analysis of internal documents, and relevant regulations. The results indicate that SIMAPAN BKPM strenghthens transparency through real-time monitoring of SPP status, enchances accountability through multi0layer verification mechanism between verificator and PPSPM, and supports effectiveness of the budget disbursment process. However, SIMAPAN BKPM has not fully supporting public information disclosure as the system is used solely for internal purposes. Overall, SIMAPAN BKPM positively contributes to the achievemnt of SDG 16, particulary in strenghtening effective, accountabily, and transparent instituitions.
References
Astuti, J., As’ari, H., & Anjani, N. (2024). Pengelolaan Informasi Publik di Tinjau dari Perspektif Good Governance di Kabupaten Bengkalis. Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan, 10(13), 432–448. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12786669
Beshi, T. D., & Kaur, R. (2020). Public Trust in Local Government: Explaining the Role of Good Governance Practices. Public Organization Review, 20(2), 337–350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-019-00444-6
Ikatan Akuntan Indonesia. (2021). Sistem Informasi & Pengendalian Internal. Ikatan Akuntan Indonesia.
Indikator.co.id. (2024). TIngkat kepercayaan Publik Terhadap Lembaga Penegak Hukum dan Politik. https://indikator.co.id/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/RILIS-INDIKATOR-23-JANUARI-2024.pdf
Jensen, M. C., Meckling, W. H., Benston, G., Canes, M., Henderson, D., Leffler, K., Long, J., Smith, C., Thompson, R., Watts, R., & Zimmerman, J. (1976). Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. In Journal of Financial Economics (Issue 4). Harvard University Press. http://hupress.harvard.edu/catalog/JENTHF.html
Komite Nasional Kebijakan Governansi. (2022). Pedoman Umum Governansi Sektor Publik Indonesia (PUG-SPI).
Mardiasmo. (2018). Akuntansi Sektor Publik. Penerbit Andi.
Maria, E., & Halim, A. (2021). Public Governance dan Korupsi: Bukti Pengujian Dari Indonesia Menggunakan Perspektif Teori Keagenan. Jurnal Akuntansi, 11(3), 223–234. https://doi.org/10.33369/j.akuntansi.11.3.223-234
Marina, A., Wahjono, S. I., Syaban, M., & Suarni, A. (2018). Sistem Informasi Akuntansi : Teori dan Praktikal. UM Surabaya.
Nazsir, N. (2003). Good Governance.
Purwohedi, U. (2022). Metodologi Penelitian Prinsi dan Praktik.
Putu, N., & Widanti, T. (2022). Konsep Good Governance dalam Perspektif Pelayanan Publik: Sebuah Tinjauan Literatur. In Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat (Vol. 3, Issue 1).
Romney, M., Steinbart, P., Mula, J., McNamara, R., & Tonkin, T. (2012). Accounting Information Systems (14th ed.). Pearson Australia.
Sawir, M. (2017). Konsep Akuntabilitas Publik.
Setyaningrum, D., Wardhani, R., & Syakhroza, A. (2017). Good Public Governance, Corruption and Public Service Quality: Indonesia Evidence. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326253585
Sumantri, I. (2023). Transparansi.
Ulum, A. S. (2011). Peran Pengukuran Kinerja Dalam Mendukung Good Governance Dalam Perspektif Agency Theory.
UNDP. (2020). Goal 16 Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions.
