Rancangan Desain Pembelajaran Science, Technology, Enggineering And Mathematics untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa
Rancangan Desain Pembelajaran Science, Technology, Enggineering And Mathematics untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21009/jrpmj.v7i1.27486Keywords:
Mathematical Problem Solving Ability, STEM Approach, Mathematics LearningAbstract
One of the mathematical abilities that must be mastered by students is the ability to solve mathematical problems. If students have good mathematical problem solving skills, students will not only memorize the concepts that have been taught but can also be applied in everyday life and other disciplines. So it is important for a student to improve his mathematical problem solving abilities. But in learning, the teacher often gives questions that are routine in nature which causes the students' mathematical problem solving ability to be low. When students are asked to work on non-routine questions, students find it difficult. Therefore, the authors designed a learning design that allows students to apply mathematical concepts to other disciplines and everyday life. The design of the learning design chosen by the author is to use the Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) learning approach which is expected to use the STEM approach to improve students' mathematical problem solving abilities
References
Damayanti, Novita & Kartini, K. (2022). Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa SMA pada Materi Barisan dan Deret Geometri. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 11(1), 107-118.
Elita, G., Habibi, M., Putra, A., & Ulandari, N. (2019). Pengaruh Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning dengan Pendekatan Metakognisi terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 8(3), 447- 458. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31980/moshar afa.v8i3.517
Faoziyah, N. (2019). STEM Berbasis PBL Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Dan Motivasi Belajar (Doctoral dissertation, Perpustakaan Pascasarjana).
Mardiah, M., & Syarifudin, S. (2019). Model-Model Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Konseling: Mitra Ash-Shibyan 2(1), 38-50.
NCTM. (2000). Principles and Standars for School Matematics. USA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematic
Pimthong, Pattamaporn., John Williams. 2018. “Preservice Teacher’s Understanding STEM Education”. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences 41 (2020) 289-295. Doi: http://kjss.kasetsart.org http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2018.07.017
Roubides, P. (2015). An instructional design process for undergraduate mathematics curriculum online. Procedia Computer Science, 65, 294-303.
Ruseffendi. (2006). Pengantar Kepada Membantu Guru Mengembangkan Kompetensinya dalam Pengajaran Matematika untuk Meningkatkan CBSA. Bandung: Tarsito
Setiana, N. P., Fitriani, N., & Amelia, R. (2021). Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa SMA Pada Materi Trigonometri Berdasarkan Kemampuan Awal Matematis Siswa. JPMI (Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Inovatif), 4(4), 899-910.
Soedjadi, R. 2000. Kiat Pendidikan Matematika di Indonesia. Direktorat Jenderal Pendidkan Tinggi Departemen Pendidkan Nasional
Sundayana, R. (2014). Media dan Alat Peraga Dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Tim STEM. 2019. “Integrasi STEM dalam Implementasi Kurikulum 2013”. 2019. https://www.slideshare.net/MushlihatunSyarifah/karakteristik-stem
Torlakson, T. 2014. “Innovate: A BluePrint For Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics in California Public Education”. California: State Superintendent of Public Instruction.
