Studi Perbandingan Prestasi Belajar Matematika Menggunakan Model Pembelajaran Discovery Learning dan The Power of Two
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21009/jrpmj.v4i2.28900Kata Kunci:
discovery learning learning model, the power of two exploration model, student learning achievementAbstrak
This study aims to find out the differences in the learning achievements of students who are taught using the Discovery Learning learning model with students who are taught using the Power of Two learning model. This type of research is Quasi Eksperiment. Sampling techniques use Probability Sampling by means of Cluster Random Sampling so that class VIII B is obtained as a Discovery Learning class and class VIII C as the Power of two class. Data collection techniques are carried out by means of obervasi and write tests. The data was analyzed using a normality test, a homogeneity test and an independent sample t test. From the results of the study obtained (i) The average cognitive learning outcome (post-test) of class VIII B students with discovery learning model of 79.22 and the average cognitive learning results (post-test) of class VIII C students with the learning model of the Power of Two of 79.11. (ii) there is no significant difference between a student's mathematical learning achievement after being taught using the Dicovery Learning model and the Power of Two.
Referensi
Andriyani, A., & Ratu, N. (2018). Analisis kesalahan siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal cerita pada materi program linear ditinjau dari gaya kognitif siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Berkarakter, 1(1), 16–22. https://doi.org/10.31764/pendekar.v1i1.252
Arifin, S., Rahman, A., & Asdar. (2016). Profil pemecahan masalah matematika siswa ditinjau dari gaya kognitif dan efikasi diri pada siswa kelas VIII unggulan SMPN 1 Watampone. Jurnal Daya Matematis, 3(1), 20–29. https://doi.org/10.26858/jds.v3i1.1313
Dwi Octaviani, K., Indrawatiningsih, N., & Afifah, A. (2021). Kemampuan visualisasi spasial siswa dalam memecahkan masalah geometri bangun ruang sisi datar. International Journal of Progressive Mathematics Education, 1(1), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.22236/ijopme.v1i1.6583
Firdaus, M. D., Purwanto, S. E., & Nuriadin, I. (2021). Kontribusi self-efficacy dan mathematics anxiety terhadap kemampuan penalaran matematika siswa. International Journal of Progressive Mathematics Education, 1(2), 85–103. https://doi.org/10.22236/ijopme.v1i2.6488
Hastuti, E. S., Umam, K., Eclarin, L., & Perbowo, K. S. (2021). Kecemasan siswa sekolah menengah pertama dalam menyelesaikan masalah SPLDV pada kelas virtual. International Journal of Progressive Mathematics Education, 1(1), 63–84. https://doi.org/10.22236/ijopme.v1i1.6914
Hendriyadi. (2017). Validitas isi: Tahap awal pengembangan kuesioner. Jurnal Riset Manajemen dan Bisnis (JRMB) Fakultas Ekonomi UNIAT, 2(2), 169–178. https://doi.org/10.98351/jrmb.v2i2.4343
Ike, F., & Suhendri, H. (2021). Analisis kemampuan pemahaman konsep matematis siswa kelas V pada materi kubus dan balok. International Journal of Progressive Mathematics Education, 1(2), 161–183. https://doi.org/10.22236/ijopme.v1i2.7308
Ikram, M., Purwanto, & Parta, I. N. (2021). Analysis of the occurrence of reversible reasoning for inverse cases: A case study on the subject Adjie. International Journal of Progressive Mathematics Education, 1(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.22236/ijopme.v1i1.6635
Islamiyah, A. C., Prayitno, S., & Amrullah. (2018). Analisis kesalahan siswa SMP pada penyelesaian masalah sistem persamaan linear dua variabel. Jurnal Didaktik Matematika, 5(1), 66–76. https://doi.org/10.24815/jdm.v5i1.10035
Karim, A., Soebagyo, J., & Purwanto, S. E. (2021). Stochastic block model reveals maps of in applied mathematics studies using VOS viewer. International Journal of Progressive Mathematics Education, 1(2), 127–142. https://doi.org/10.22236/ijopme.v1i2.6917
Kosiret, A., Indiyah, F. H., & Wijayanti, D. A. (2021). The use of generative learning model in improving students’ understanding of mathematical concepts of Al-Azhar 19 Islamic High School. International Journal of Progressive Mathematics Education, 1(1), 16–26. https://doi.org/10.22236/ijopme.v1i1.6593
Kurniasih, N., Hidayani, F., Muchlis, A., & Soebagyo, J. (2021). Analisis kemandirian belajar matematika siswa SMA kelas XI selama pembelajaran jarak jauh. International Journal of Progressive Mathematics Education, 1(2), 116–126. https://doi.org/10.22236/ijopme.v1i2.6568
Moleong, L. J. (2019). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Natsir, N., Tandiayuk, M. B., & Karniman, T. S. (2016). Profil kesalahan konseptual dan prosedural siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal cerita himpunan di kelas VII SMPN 1 Siniu. Jurnal Elektronik Pendidikan Matematika Tadulako, 3(4), 440–453. http://dx.doi.org/10.21022/jpmt.v3i4.174
Ngilawajan, D. A. (2013). Proses berpikir siswa SMA dalam memecahkan masalah matematika materi turunan ditinjau dari gaya kognitif field independent dan field dependent. Jurnal Pedagogia, 2(1), 71–83. https://doi.org/10.21070/pedagogia.v2i1.48
Nur, A. S., & Palobo, M. (2018). Profil kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika siswa ditinjau dari perbedaan gaya kognitif dan gender. Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif, 9(2), 139–148. http://dx.doi.org/10.15294/kreano.v9i2.15067
Nurussafa’at, A. F., Sujadi, I., & Riyadi. (2016). Analisis kesalahan siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal cerita pada materi volume prisma dengan Fong’s schematic model for error analysis ditinjau dari gaya kognitif siswa. Jurnal Elektronik Pembelajaran Matematika, 4(2), 174–187. http://doi.org/10.31012/jpm.v4i2.254
Prayitno, S. (2019). Evaluasi pembelajaran matematika. Duta Pustaka Ilmu.
Pujilestari. (2018). Analisis kesalahan siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal matematika SMA materi operasi aljabar bentuk pangkat dan akar. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan, 2(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.36312/jisip.v2i1.264
Putri, S., Husna, A., & Agustyaningrum, N. (2021). Analisis kesalahan siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal barisan dan deret berdasarkan teori Newman ditinjau dari gaya kognitif. Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 5(2), 1548–1561. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v5i2
Raharti, & Yunianta. (2020). Identifikasi kesalahan matematika siswa SMP berdasarkan tahapan Kastolan. Journal of Honai Math, 3(1), 77–100. https://doi.org/10.30862/jhm.v3i1.114
Saida, Ikram, M., & Salwah. (2021). Analysis of students’ creative thinking in solving cuboid problems. International Journal of Progressive Mathematics Education, 1(2), 104–116. https://doi.org/10.22236/ijopme.v1i2.7307
Sugiyono. (2016). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Sulistyorini, E. E., Laili, N., & Rahmadiana, S. (2021). Profil pemahaman siswa pada materi peluang berdasarkan tingkat kemampuan matematis melalui pembelajaran jarak jauh (PJJ). International Journal of Progressive Mathematics Education, 1(2), 143–160. https://doi.org/10.22236/ijopme.v1i2.6569
Susanto, H. (2015). Pemahaman pemecahan masalah berdasarkan gaya kognitif. Deepublish.
Widdiharto, R. (2008). Diagnosis kesulitan belajar matematika SMP dan alternatif proses remidinya. Pusat Pengembangan dan Pemberdayaan Pendidik dan Tenaga Kependidikan Matematika Yogyakarta.
Yekti, S. M. P., Kusmayadi, T. A., & Riyadi. (2016). Penalaran matematis siswa dalam pemecahan masalah aljabar ditinjau dari gaya konitif field dependent - field independent. Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education, 6(2), 177–192. https://doi.org/10.20961/jmme.v6i2.10064
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2022 Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika Jakarta
Artikel ini berlisensi Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
