Efektivitas Desain Didaktis Materi Lingkaran Berbasis Realistic Mathematics Education terhadap Kemampuan Pemahaman Konsep Matematis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21009/jrpmj.v7i2.61476Keywords:
desain didaktis, Realistic Mathematics Education, pemahaman konsep matematis, lingkaranAbstract
This study aims to examine the effectiveness of a didactical design-based teaching material grounded in Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) on the topic of circles in improving students’ conceptual understanding of mathematics. The study employed a quasi-experimental approach with a nonequivalent control group design. The participants consisted of 60 eighth-grade students from a junior high school, divided into the experimental group using RME-based learning modules and the control group receiving conventional, teacher-centered instruction. The main instrument was a conceptual understanding test developed based on six indicators: restating concepts, providing examples and non-examples, classifying, representing, explaining relationships among concepts, and applying procedures meaningfully. Results revealed that the experimental group achieved a higher mean N-gain (0.74, high category) compared to the control group (0.30, low–moderate category). The t-test showed a significant difference (p < 0.001) with a large effect size (Cohen’s d = 1.47). Analysis by indicator indicated significant improvements across all aspects, particularly in explaining conceptual relationships and mathematical representation. These findings confirm that RME-based didactical design materials effectively enhance students’ conceptual understanding of circles by facilitating meaningful rediscovery through real-world contexts and progressive mathematical modeling. Practically, the study suggests that mathematics teachers can adopt RME designs as an alternative instructional approach to promote deeper, contextual, and communicative learning in geometry.
References
Abdussakir, & Achadiyah, N. L. (2009, November). Pembelajaran keliling dan luas lingkaran dengan strategi REACT pada siswa kelas VIII SMPN 6 Kota Mojokerto. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.
Budiyanti, R. (2010). Penelitian desain untuk meningkatkan pemahaman π, keliling, dan luas lingkaran melalui pendekatan realistik. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.
Cobb, P., Gravemeijer, K., Yackel, E., McClain, K., & Whitenack, J. (1997). Mathematizing and symbolizing: The emergence of chains of signification in one first-grade classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 32(1), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007706224696
Freudenthal, H. (1991). Revisiting mathematics education: China lectures. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Freudenthal, H. (2002). Didactical phenomenology of mathematical structures. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Gravemeijer, K. (1994). Developing realistic mathematics education. Utrecht: CD-β Press.
Gravemeijer, K., & Terwel, J. (2000). Hans Freudenthal: A mathematician on didactics and curriculum theory. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 32(6), 777–796. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220270050167170
Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18809
Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (Eds.). (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. National Academy Press.
Leviana, M. (2012). Desain didaktis hubungan sudut pusat, luas juring, dan panjang busur lingkaran di SMP. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. NCTM.
OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 results (Volume I): What students know and can do. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5f07c754-en
Simon, M. A. (1995). Reconstructing mathematics pedagogy from a constructivist perspective. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26(2), 114–145. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.26.2.0114
Suryadi, D. (2010, November). Penelitian pembelajaran matematika untuk pembentukan karakter bangsa. Seminar Nasional Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.
Suryadi, D., & Turmudi. (2011, November). Kesetaraan DDR dengan RME dalam pengembangan pembelajaran matematika. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, Universitas Sebelas Maret.
Treffers, A. (1987). Three dimensions: A model of goal and theory description in mathematics instruction—the Wiskobas project. Reidel Publishing.
Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. (2003). The didactical use of models in realistic mathematics education: An example from a longitudinal trajectory on percentage. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 54(1), 9–35. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDUC.0000005212.03219.dc
Van de Walle, J. A. (2005). Elementary and middle school mathematics: Teaching developmentally (5th ed.). Pearson Education.
Widjajanti, D. B., & Suryadi, D. (2018). Developing a didactical design for learning algebra based on students’ mathematical thinking. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1013(1), 012144. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1013/1/012144
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ellis Salsabila, Mimi Nur Hajizah, Pinta Deniyanti Sampoerno

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

