Peer Review Process

Perspektif Ilmu Pendidikan is jointly published by Universitas Negeri Jakarta and managed by LPPM Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Faculty of Education Universitas Negeri Jakarta. Every manuscript submitted to Perspektif Ilmu Pendidikan will undergo a review process. Submitted manuscripts are first reviewed by the editor and evaluated by the editorial board regarding the writing format, whether it is suitable for the focus and scope of Perspektif Ilmu Pendidikan, methodological precision, and similarity checks (plagiarism).

this journal uses double-blind review, which means that both the reviewer and author identities are concealed from the reviewers, and vice versa, throughout the review process.

To facilitate this, authors need to ensure that their manuscripts are prepared in a way that does not give away their identity. To help with this preparation, please ensure the following when submitting to Measurement:

Submit the Title Page containing the Author’s details and Blinded Manuscript with no author details as two separate files.

How to prepare the Title Page

This should include the title, authors' names and affiliations, and a complete address for the corresponding author, including telephone and e-mail address.

How to prepare the Blinded Manuscript

Besides the obvious need to remove names and affiliations under the title within the manuscript, there are other steps that need to be taken to ensure the manuscript is correctly prepared for double-blind peer review. To assist with this process the key items that need to be observed are as follows:

• Use the third person to refer to work the Authors have previously undertaken, e.g. replace any phrases like “as we have shown before” with “… has been shown before [Anonymous, 2007]” .

• Make sure figures do not contain any affiliation-related identifier

• Do not eliminate essential self-references or other references ,but limit self-references only to papers that are relevant for those reviewing the submitted paper.

• Cite papers published by the Author in the text as follows: ‘[Anonymous, 2007]’.

• For blinding in the reference list: ‘[Anonymous, 2007] Details omitted for double-blind reviewing.’

• Remove references to funding sources

• Do not include acknowledgments

• Remove any identifying information, including author names, from file names and ensure document properties are also anonymized.

Then, Reviewers will consider the suitability of the manuscript in terms of contribution, originality, relevance, and presentation of the writing. Reviewer comments by the section editor are then sent to the author for correction and further action. The editor will notify the author of the review results as quickly as possible, approximately within eight weeks. Then, the results of the improvements will be reviewed again by the section editor to see the suitability of the reviewer's comments with the results of the improvements, and it is also possible for the section editor to provide insight into the revised manuscript if deemed necessary. The final decision on article acceptance will be made by the editor in accordance with the reviewer's comments.

Accepted research articles will be available online (free download) following the journal's peer-review process. The detection of plagiarism in articles in this journal is carried out using Turnitin. Authors should use Mendeley as a reference management tool. The language used in this journal is English.