COMPARISON OF PEAK GROUND ACCELERATION VALUES BASED ON DETERMINISTIC APPROACH USING EMPIRICAL EQUATIONS FOR THE CIMANDIRI FAULT: PERBANDINGAN NILAI PEAK GROUND ACCELERATION BERDASARKAN PENDEKATAN DETERMINISTIK PERSAMAAN EMPIRIS UNTUK SESAR CIMANDIRI

Haryanto; Agus Setyo Budi; Aditya Setyo Rahman; Yoga Dharma Persada

doi:10.21009/03.1301.FA03

Authors

Haryanto Fisika Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Indonesia
Agus Setyo Budi Program Studi Fisika, Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Indonesia
Aditya Setyo Rahman Badan Meteorologi Klimatologi dan Geofisika, Indonesia
Yoga Dharma Persada Badan Meteorologi Klimatologi dan Geofisika, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21009/03.1301.FA03

Abstract

The Cimandiri Fault is often cited as the trigger for many large earthquakes in West Java. The Cimandiri Fault is a 100-km long active shear fault. This study aims to compare Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA) values generated by three empirical Ground Motion Prediction Equation (GMPE) equations, namely Boore (2003), Campbell (2003) and Chiou-Young et al. (2008), with a deterministic approach. The deterministic approach uses a simple formula that considers magnitude, distance and site conditions. The comparison results show that the PGA values predicted by the empirical equations of Boore, Campbell and Chiou Young are approximately the same, but there are several factors that differentiate the results of the three parameters. This indicates that the empirical equations consider more complex factors in predicting PGA, such as earthquake source mechanisms, geological structures and nonlinear effects. This study provides important information for understanding the distribution of PGA on the Cimnadiri fault. This information can be used to strengthen buildings and infrastructure in the future, thereby minimizing the risk of earthquake damage.

References

[1] Taruna, R. M., & Prakoso S, T. A. (2020). PENENTUAN RUMUS PERCEPATAN TANAH AKIBATcGEMPA BUMI DI KOTA MATARAM MENGGUNAKAN METODE EUCLIDEAN DISTANCE.cJurnal Sains dan Teknologi , 21.

[2] Boore, M. D., & Atkinson, M. G. (2008). Ground-Motion Prediction Equations for the Average Horizontal Component of PGA, PGV, and 5%-Damped PSA at Spectral Periods between 0.01 s and 10 s. Engineering Research InstiEngineering Research Institute, page 99-138.

[3] Chiou, S.-J. B., & Youngs, R. R. (2008). An NGA Model for the Average Horizontal Component of Peak Ground Motion Component of Peak Ground Motion. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, 173-215.

[4] Campbell, K. (2008). HYBRID EMPIRICAL GROUND MOTION MODEL FOR PGA AND 5% DAMPEDLINEAR ELASTIC RESPONSE SPECTRA FROM SHALLOW CRUSTAL EARTHQUAKES IN STABLE CONTINENTAL REGIONS: EXAMPLE FOR EASTERN NORTH AMERICA. The 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering.

[5] Campbell, K. W. (2008). NGA ground motion model for geometric mean horizontal component of PGA, PGV, PGD and 5% damped linear elastic response spectra for periods ranging from 0.01 to 10s. Earthquake spectra, 24(1).