The Effect of Aluminum and Stainless Steel Thickness on the Absorption of X-Ray Radiation Dose of the Betatron SEA-7 Machine

Authors

  • Totok Dermawan Polytechnic Institute of Nuclear Technology
  • Ismail
  • Azhar Zakiyah

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21009/03.1301.FA38

Abstract

Radiographic contrast is the difference in brightness in a film image, due to differences in the object's absorption capacity for X-rays, which affects the quality of the radiographic image. Gray value is a substitute for the density of conventional radiographic film which is viewed and evaluated using a computer, to obtain a visual perception of image contrast and noise to measure the quantity of radiation that penetrates a certain area. Acceptance Value Minimum X-ray density refers to ASME Standards. The CRx gray value is 28800 minimum and 64000 maximum [1]. In the use of the Betatron Sea-7 machine, to obtain radiographic contrast, it is necessary to add aluminum (Al) or stainless steel (SS) as a filter layer. The method involves irradiating a steel material target with a thickness of 25 mm with 5 MeV energy with a dose of 35 R, either using or without a layer of Al or SS material, then analyzed using the Rhythm Review Application. The results obtained, for stainless steel, the density received at a thickness of 3 mm, 6 mm, and 9 mm, for aluminum a thickness of 3 mm. With this energy and dosage, stainless steel can be added as a layer in the operation of the Betatron Sea-7 machine to produce a radiographic film quality density that meets ASME standards [2].

References

[1] ASTM E 1316. (2022). Standard Terminology for Nondestructive Examinations. An American National Standard.

[2] Bushong, C. (2001). Radiologic Science for Technologies 7th Edition. US: A Harcourt Science Company.

[3] D. R. Ningtias, S. Suryono, & Susilo. (2016). Digital Computed Radiography Image Quality Measurement Using Image Processing Program. Indonesian Journal of Physics Education, 161-168.

[4] Ewert, U. & Zcherpel, U., M., J., (2012). Concepts for Evaluation of Image Quality in Digital Radiology. AIP Conference Proceedings 1430, 589.

[5] GE Inspection Technologies. (2008). Industrial Radiography Image Forming Techniques. General Electric Company. Procedia Structural Integrity, 50-57.

[6] Nuclear Standardization and Quality Center. (2015). RSNI 2 ISO 17636-2

[7] Pardede, D. M., & Setiawati, E. (2014). Calculation of Computed Radiography (CR) Dose and Contrast Values with Variations in Thickness and Combination of Filter Types. Youngster Physics Journal, 287-294.

[8] Sieberr, J. A., & Bone, J. M. (2005). X-ray Imaging Physics for Nuclear Medicine Technologies. Part 2: X-ray Interaction and Image Formation. Journal Nuclear Medicine Tech, 3-18.

[9] Sotja, E., Nardoni, G., & Nardoni, P. (2011). Contras Gradient Determination in Digital Radiography to Optimize The Capability in Defect Detection.

[10] THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEER, S. V. (2013). ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

[11] Tomsk Polytechnic University. (2015). Manual Betatron SEA 7.

[12] Zcherpel, U., M., J., & Ewert, U. (2012). Concepts for Evaluation of Image Quality in Digital Radiology. AIP Conference Proceedings 1430, 589.

Downloads

Published

2025-01-04

How to Cite

Totok Dermawan, Ismail, & Azhar Zakiyah. (2025). The Effect of Aluminum and Stainless Steel Thickness on the Absorption of X-Ray Radiation Dose of the Betatron SEA-7 Machine. PROSIDING SEMINAR NASIONAL FISIKA (E-JOURNAL), 13(1), FA–255. https://doi.org/10.21009/03.1301.FA38