A Critical Discourse Analysis of the Representation of Social Actors in the Debate Between Prabowo Subianto and Anies Baswedan on the Kompas TV YouTube Channel

Authors

  • Monica Syafitri Universitas Negeri Jakarta
  • Liliana Muliastuti Universitas Negeri Jakarta
  • Siti Ansoriyah Universitas Negeri Jakarta
  • N. Lia Marliana Universitas Negeri Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21009.Aksis.100108

Keywords:

emoji, digital communication, WhatsApp, emotional meaning, teenagers

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the role of emoji in the construction of emotional meaning in digital communication, especially on the WhatsApp platform among teenagers. With the increasing use of instant messaging applications, emoji has become an integral part of digital communication used to express emotions that are difficult to convey through text alone. Through a quantitative approach with a survey method of 50 respondents, this study explores the pattern of emoji use, user perceptions of the function of emoji in clarifying emotions, and how social context influences the interpretation of emoji. The results show that the majority of respondents use emoji to clarify emotions (70% agree), consider messages without emoji to be incomplete (37% agree), and believe that emoji helps reduce misunderstandings in digital communication (64% agree). However, there is an awareness that the meaning of emoji can be ambiguous and is influenced by the context and relationship between the sender and recipient. This study contributes to the understanding of the dynamics of digital communication and the role of non-verbal elements in the construction of emotional meaning in the era of text-based communication.

References

Anas, R., & Hamdani, A. (2024). Strategi Penyembunyian dan Pengucilan Aktor Sosial dalam Berita Razia Kamar Kos: Analisis Wacana Theo Van Leeuwen. Empiricism Journal, 5(2), 340–350. https://doi.org/10.36312/ej.v5i2.2250

Azizah, R. N., & Hidayah, N. N. (2025). Analisis komparatif Komunikasi Digital Anies Baswedan, Prabowo Subianto, dan Ganjar Pranowo pada Pilpres 2024. Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Sosial Dan Eksakta, 5(1), 72–84. https://doi.org/10.47134/trilogi.v5i1.1697

Dewi, L. L., Gede Nurjaya, I., Dewa, I., & Utama, B. (2025). Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia Tersedia secara online https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/JJPBS Analisis Wacana Kritis Model Teun A. Van Dijk Pidato Perdana Presiden RI 2024. 15, 336–347. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpbsi.v15i3.102049

Fairclough, N. (2015). Language and power (3. rd [updated] ed.). Routledge.

Hanafiah, B., Hamdani, A., & Mulyadi, U. A. (2026). Representasi Aktor Sosial Dalam Wacana Digitalisasi Pendidikan: Analisis Wacana Kritis Model Theo Van Leeuwen Terhadap Pemberitaan Peluncuran Transformasi Pembelajaran Oleh Presiden. Literasi: Jurnal Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia Serta Pembelajarannya, 10(1), 123–131.

Juariah, A. S., & Sobari, T. (2025). Analisis Wacana Kritis Theo van Leeuwen pada Pemberitaan Kompas. com tentang Kasus Kepala Sekolah Menampar Siswa Perokok. Pendas: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 10(04), 294–310.

Marliana, N. L., Jaafar, M. F., & Radzi, H. B. (2023). Penanda Pengemukaan Topik dalam Wacana Pedagogi: Satu Analisis Wacana Kritis (Topic Delivery Markers in Pedagogical: Discourse based on Critical Discourse Analysis). GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies, 23(2), 75–93. https://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2023-2302-05

Moleong, L. J. . (2021). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Mustopa, E., & Hamdani, A. (2025). Analisis Wacana Kritis Theo Van Leeuwen pada pemberitaan penolakan UU TNI terus bergulir lewat tenda di gerbang DPR dalam Detik. com edisi 8 April 2025. Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research, 5(1), 3975–3994.

Nur Hofifah, & Sakrim. (2026). Strategi Wacana dan Konstruksi Kekuasaan dalam Debat Capres 2024: Analisis Wacana Kritis Norman Fairclough. Journal of Authentic Research, 5(2).

Oktaviani, R., Ansoriyah, S., Rizkia, M. F., & Chan, S. M. (2025). Development Of Moral Value Poetry Writing Through Project-Based Learning. Esteem Journal of English Education Study Programme, 8(2), 1093–1103.

Prastika, A. Y., Nazili, A. R., Nadhifah, M., Dini, R., & Jayanti, R. (2024). Artikel Menelisik Narasi Berita: Wacana Kritis Teori Inclusion Theo Van Leeuwen Dalam Berita Kriminal Dengan Tema Kriminal Koran Kompas Edisi 25 April 2024: Menelisik Narasi Berita: Wacana Kritis Teori Inclusion Theo Van Leeuwen Dalam Berita Kriminal Dengan Tema Kriminal Koran Kompas Edisi 25 April 2024. KLITIKA Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 6(2), 56–64.

Rizkia, M. F., Purwahida, R., Oktaviani, R., Purbarani, E., & Nanda, A. P. (2025). Analysis of Teaching Material Needs for Short Story Writing with the Utilisation of Artificial Intelligence (AI) for High School Students. Sebatik, 29(2), 231–238. https://doi.org/10.46984/sebatik.v29i2.2683

Silaban, J. P. K., Ilma, D., Sembiring, P. Br., & Sinar, T. S. (2025). Social Actor Representation in Prabowo Subianto’s 2024 Debate Discourse. Lexeme : Journal of Linguistics and Applied Linguistics, 7(2), 475–486. https://doi.org/10.32493/ljlal.v7i2.51304

Sugiyono. (2023). Metode penelitian kualitatif (3rd ed.). Alfabeta.

Van Dijk, T. A. (2021). Discourse and power. Bloomsbury Publishing.

Van Leeuwen, T. (2008). Discourse and practice: New tools for critical discourse analysis. Oxford university press.

We Are Social, & Meltwater. (2025). Digital 2025: Indonesia. We Are Social.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-26