Students’ Toxic Friendship Behavior Survey: Challenges To Creating A Healthy Learning Environment

Authors

  • Dian Oktary Universitas Riau
  • Isnaria Rizki Hayati Universitas Riau
  • Khairiyah Khadijah Universitas Riau
  • Putri Yuningsih Universitas Riau

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21009/INSIGHT.151.07

Keywords:

Toxic Friendship, Learning Environment, Guidance and Counseling

Abstract

Toxic friendship behavior among students is on the rise and has the potential to undermine the quality of social interactions and the learning environment. This situation poses a serious challenge to creating a healthy and conducive learning environment in schools. This study aims to comprehensively analyze the prevalence of toxic friendship behavior and evaluate its relationship with the quality of the students’ learning environment. The research subjects were students at a high school in Pekanbaru selected through stratified random sampling. The study employed a quantitative approach using a structured questionnaire-based survey method. Data analysis was conducted using descriptive and inferential statistics, including percentage calculations and correlation tests. The results indicate that toxic friendship behavior falls into the moderate category, with a tendency to negatively impact social interactions and learning comfort. It is concluded that toxic friendship contributes to a decline in the quality of the learning environment. The implications of this study underscore the urgency of strengthening preventive guidance and counseling services in schools.

References

Arifin, I. A., Soetikno, N., & Dewi, F. R. I. (2021). Kritik diri sebagai mediator pada hubungan konsep diri dan perilaku nonsuicidal self-injury remaja korban perundungan. Jurnal Muara Ilmu Sosial, Humaniora, dan Seni, 5(2), 317–326. https://doi.org/10.24912/jmishumsen.v5i2.9973

Akbar, A., & Hastjarjo, T. D. (2018). Kohesivitas tim dan sikap terhadap kepemimpinan wasit sebagai prediktor kecenderungan perilaku agresif pemain sepak bola. Gadjah Mada Journal of Psychology, 4(1), 42–50.

Ariska, R., Bariyyah, K., & Sari, E. K. W. (2019). Teknik bibliokonseling sebagai treatment untuk meningkatkan empati siswa. Psychocentrum Review, 1(2), 79–84. https://doi.org/10.30998/pcr.1210

Firmansyah, M. R., Amelia, R., Jamil, R. A., & Minza, W. M. (2019). Benevolence, competency, and integrity: Which one is more influential on trust in friendships? [Nama Jurnal Belum Tersedia], 18(1).

Gumelar, Y. A. R. (2022). Analisis terhadap konsep diri remaja pecinta anime di komunitas Genesis Art Semarang. [Nama Jurnal Belum Tersedia], 34(1).

Indra Sari, M., & Rezania, V. (2026). Analisis pembentukan nilai kolaborasi siswa sekolah dasar melalui aktivitas permainan tradisional. Action Research Journal Indonesia (ARJI), 8, 573–587. https://doi.org/10.61227

Irwanti, M., & Muharman, D. (2015). Perspektif baru groupthink: Perbedaan tingkat pendidikan dalam proses pengambilan keputusan kelompok. Mimbar, 31(1).

Kurniawati, Y., & Rahma, U. (2017). Empati terhadap siswa berkebutuhan khusus: Ditinjau dari jenjang pendidikan inklusi dan jenis kelamin. Jurnal Psikologi Undip, 16(1).

Kusprayogi, Y., & Nashori, F. (2016). Kerendahhatian dan pemaafan pada mahasiswa. Psikohumaniora: Jurnal Penelitian Psikologi, 1(1).

Manurung, K. (2021). Alkitab dan hubungan pertemanan: Kajian teologi Pentakosta memaknai hubungan pertemanan dalam Alkitab. [Nama Jurnal Belum Lengkap], 2, 2723–2751.

Neoh, M. J. Y., Teng, J. H., Lee, A., Setoh, P., Mulatti, C., & Esposito, G. (2022). Negative emotional reactions to criticism: Perceived criticism and source affects extent of hurt and relational distancing. PLoS ONE, 17(8), Article e0271869. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0271869

Nurdin, M. N., & Fakhri, N. (2020). Perbedaan empati kognitif dan empati afektif pada remaja laki-laki dan perempuan. Jurnal Psikologi TALENTA, 2(2), 11–20. https://doi.org/10.26858/talenta.v2i2.13199

Priyanto, E., & Wening, N. (2024). The influence of dominant leadership and group cohesiveness on groupthinkphenomenon in the decision-making process: A systematic literature review. Eduvest—Journal of Universal Studies, 4(4), 4766–4784.

Ramadani, D., Wahyuni, E., & Hidayat, D. R. (2022). Gambaran kritik diri (self-criticism) pada mahasiswa. Jurnal Konseling dan Pendidikan, 10(1), 185–193. https://doi.org/10.29210/176700

Ramanda, P., & Syahniar. (2017). Interaksi sosial siswa berprestasi dalam belajar. Konselor, 6(2), 66–72. https://doi.org/10.24036/02017627564-0-00

Rofiqi, R., Iksan, & Mansyur, M. (2023). Melangkah menuju kesehatan mental yang optimal: Program inovatif di lembaga pendidikan Islam. Edu Consilium: Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Pendidikan Islam, 4(2), 76–99. https://doi.org/10.19105/ec.v4i2.9237

Rynek, M., & Ellwart, T. (2022). An experimental study of triggers and needs of threats in critical adversity situations in a student sample. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 897542. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.897542

Safira, M., Dewi, T., & Minza, W. M. (2016). Mempertahankan hubungan pertemanan lintas jenis pada dewasa. Journal of Psychology, 2(3), 192–205.

Setiyoningsih, N., Hidayat, R., & Jannah, W. (2017). Pengembangan media bibliokonseling untuk mengembangkan empati siswa SMA. Jurnal Psikoedukasi dan Konseling, 1(2).

Sultan, M. A., & Khan, N. N. (2025). Rethinking empathy development in childhood and adolescence: A call for global, culturally adaptive strategies. Frontiers in Psychology, 16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1575249

Susanti, R. H., Andrianta, A., & Qurotaayunina, R. P. (2023). Pengembangan prosocial behavior peserta didik jenjang sekolah menengah pertama melalui teknik bermain peran. Jurnal Moral Kemasyarakatan, 8(1), 97–104. https://doi.org/10.21067/jmk.v8i1.8515

Umar, A. F. F., Yusuf, A., Amini, A. R., & Alhadi, A. (2023). Pengaruh motivasi belajar terhadap peningkatan prestasi akademik siswa. Wacana: Jurnal Bahasa, Seni, dan Pengajaran, 7(2), 121–133. https://doi.org/10.29407/jbsp.v7i2.20670

Published

2026-06-30