Analysis of the Influence of Interactive Communication, Consumer Preferences, and Promotional Effectiveness on Purchasing Decisions on the Shopee Live Streaming Features
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21009/ISC-BEAM.011.16Keywords:
Interactive Communication, Consumer Preferences, Promotional Effectiveness, Purchasing Decisions, Shopee Live StreamingAbstract
With the popularity of the live streaming features as a marketing strategy, there is a need to understand in more depth how factors such as Interactive Communication, Consumer Preferences, and Promotional Effectiveness influence consumer purchasing decisions in the context of using Shopee's live streaming feature. It is important to understand how direct interactions between sellers and consumers via live broadcasts influence consumer perceptions of products or services, as well as the extent to which consumer preferences and promotional effectiveness can influence consumer purchase intentions through these features. In this case the researcher uses quantitative research with a comparative causal type because it discusses the cause-and-effect relationship of two or more variables, namely the influence of independent variables in the form of interactive communication, consumer preferences, and online promotions on the dependent variable, namely purchasing decisions with Shopee's live streaming feature. as the object. With Interactive Communication results are related to purchasing decisions because the T statistics value is above 1.96 and the p value is below 0.05 , the consumer preference variable is related to purchasing decisions because the T statistics value is above 1.96 and the p value is below 0.05 . However, the promotion effectiveness variable is not related to purchasing decisions because the T statistics value is below 1.96 and the p value is above 0.05. Streamers or sellers can increase interaction with customers, pay attention to their preferences, and don't just focus on promotions to attract customers.
References
Ardelia, I., & Sukendro, GG (2019). Nikon Ambassador Interactive Communication in Maintaining Brand Image (Case Study of Instagram Social Media Account @Sukiminthio). Prologia , 3 (2), 365. https://doi.org/10.24912/pr.v3i2.6360
Batjo, N. (2018). Application of Marketing Communications to Behavior and Purchasing Decisions. Journal of Islamic Management and Business , 1 (2), 1–19.
Fajarani, E., Wildayana, E., & Elysa Putri, N. (2021). Consumer Preferences Regarding Decisions to Purchase Organic Vegetables at the Diamond Supermarket, Palembang City. Journal of Agribusiness Study Program , 2 (1), 38–50. https://doi.org/10.56869/kaliagri.v2i1.193
Ghozali, & Latan. (2015). Evaluation of the Measurement Model (Outer Model). Chapter III Research Methods , 1–9.
Manik, S. (2017). The Influence of Job Satisfaction on Work Discipline of Employees at the Pendalian Iv Koto Subdistrict Office, Rokan Hulu Regency. International Journal of Social Science and Business , 1 (4), 257. https://doi.org/10.23887/ijssb.v1i4.12526
Negeri, D., & Andriyanty, R. (2019). differ from each other based on the conditions of internet users in Indonesia in the 20th generation population age group born between 1995 transition from generation Y and is an influence on personality . 7 (2), 280–296.
Noor, J. (2011). Research methodology. Jakarta: Kencana . 1–23.
Paramita Purnama, Rosita Anggraini, Arintowati Hartono, Irwansyah, & Niken F. Ernungtyas. (2019). Exposure to Digital Advertising, Word of Mouth and Interactive Marketing Communications on Personal Care Product Purchasing Decisions. COMMUNITY: Communication Media and Da'wah , 9 (2), 192–209. https://doi.org/10.35905/komunida.v9i2.1123
Pohan, D. D., & Fitria, US (2021). Types of Communication. Journal of Educational Research and Social Studies , 2 , p. 31.
Putra, H.F., & Yandri, P. (2020). The Influence of Interactive Digital Media on Purchasing Decisions. Independent Journal: Science, Arts, and Technology , 4 (2), 171–177. https://doi.org/10.33753/mandiri.v4i2.114
Ramadhani, F., Barokah, U., & Sutrisno, J. (2020). Analysis of Consumer Preferences for Purchasing Tea in Sukoharjo Regency. AGRISAINTIFICS: Journal of Agricultural Sciences , 4 (1), 21. https://doi.org/10.32585/ags.v4i1.838Saefudin, BR, Deaniera, AN, & Rasmikayati, E. (2020). Comparative Study of Consumer Preferences in Two Coffee Shops. Agrovital : Journal of Agricultural Sciences , 5 (1), 39–46.
Salim, HS, Goh, TS, & Margery, E. (2022). The Influence of Marketing Communication and Products on Purchasing Decisions at Pt. Furnilux Indonesia. Collegiate Business Journal , 8 (1). https://doi.org/10.57249/jbk.v8i1.75
Sari, AC, Hartina, R., Awalia, R., Irianti, H., & Ainun, N. (2018). Communication and Social Media. The Messenger Journal , 3 (2), 69. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Astari-Clara-Sari/publication/329998890_KOMUNIKA_DAN_MEDIA_SOSIAL/links/5c2f3d83299bf12be3ab90d2/KOMUNIKA-DAN-MEDIA-SOSIAL.pdf
STEI INDONESIA. (2017). Chapter III research methods 3.1. Chapter III Research Methods , Chapter iii me , 1–9.
Syam, SA, Haeruddin, MIW, Ruma, Z., Musa, MI, & Hasbiah, S. (2022). The Influence of Consumer Preferences on Product Purchasing Decisions on the Marketplace. Value Added: Economics And Business Magazine , 18 (2), 73–79.
Wardhani, W., Sumarwan, U., & Yuliati, LN (2016). The Influence of Consumer Perceptions and Preferences on Green Product Residential Purchasing Decisions. Journal of Management and Organization , 6 (1), 45. https://doi.org/10.29244/jmo.v6i1.12183
