NEED ASSESSMENT FOR DEEP LEARNING MODEL THROUGH THE INTEGRATION SOCIO-SCIENTIFIC ISSUES IN ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS

Authors

  • Sonya Sinyanyuri Universitas Negeri Jakarta
  • Yuli Rahmawati Universitas Negeri Jakarta
  • M Syarif Sumantri Universitas Negeri Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21009/ishel.v1i1.56522

Abstract

This preliminary study investigates the need for a learning model that integrates socio-scientific issues in deep learning to enhance critical thinking elementary students. It aims to identify the critical  thinking  skills students and the key instructional needs that must be addressed in developing a learning model to enhance students’ critical thinking at the elementary school. The  study uses sequential explanatory design model,  involving  157  grade V students and 19 teachers.  Quantitive data  were collected through a critical thinking test to measure students' critical thinking skills. The qualitative data were collected through questionnaires and interviews to identify the key instructional needs that must be addressed in developing a learning model to enhance students’ critical thinking at the elementary level. The findings show that that the average critical thinking of students in all indicator an average below 50, meaning that the ability is still low. Based on the questionnaire, it was found that most of the learning experiences not encourage students to be active and think critically yet, and teachers needed assistance in learning designing. Therefore, an alternative learning model is needed to develop students' critical thinking, which is easy to apply and does not require large costs

References

Ananda, L. R., Rahmawati, Y., & Khairi, F. (2023). Critical Thinking Skills of Chemistry Students By Integrating Design Thinking with STEAM-PJBL. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 13(1), 352–367. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.1938

Ariza, M. R., Christodoulou, A., van Harskamp, M., Knippels, M. C. P. J., Kyza, E. A., Levinson, R., & Agesilaou, A. (2021). Socio‐scientific inquiry‐based learning as a means toward environmental citizenship. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(20). https://doi.org/10.3390/su132011509

BSKAP. (2022). Capaian Pembelajaran Mata Pelajaran Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam dan Sosial (IPAS) Fase A-Fase C Untuk SD/MI/Program Paket A.

Cervetti, G. N., Barber, J., Dorph, R., Pearson, P. D., & Goldschmidt, P. G. (2012). The impact of an integrated approach to science and literacy in elementary school classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(5), 631–658. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21015

Choi, S. Y., Won, A. R., Chu, H. E., Cha, H. J., Shin, H., & Kim, C. J. (2021). The Impacts of a Climate Change SSI-STEAM Program on Junior High School Students’ Climate Literacy. Asia-Pacific Science Education, 7(1), 96–133. https://doi.org/10.1163/23641177-bja10019

Damayanti, G. A., & Muhroji, M. (2022). The Difficulties of Elementary School Teacher in Developing Thematic Learning Tools for the Merdeka Curriculum. Jurnal Kependidikan: Jurnal Hasil Penelitian Dan Kajian Kepustakaan Di Bidang Pendidikan, Pengajaran Dan Pembelajaran, 8(3), 703. https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v8i3.5770

Desstya, A. (2014). Kedudukan dan Aplikasi Pendidikan Sains di Sekolah Dasar. Profesi Pendidikan Dasar, 1(2), 193–200.

Dyaning Wijayanti, I., & Ekantini, A. (2023). Implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka Pada Pembelajaran IPAS MI/SD. Pendas: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 8.

Erten, S. (2021). Different Perspectives on Environmental Education. www.isres.org

Fajari, L. E. W., Sarwanto, & Chumdari. (2020). Student critical thinking skills and learning motivation in elementary students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1440(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1440/1/012104

Fitriadi, F., Herpratiwi, H., Yulianti, D., Setiyadi, A. G. B., Hariri, H., Sunyono, S., Haenilah, E. Y., & Mukhlis, H. (2025). Enhancing critical thinking in elementary education: A systematic review of effective learning models. Multidisciplinary Reviews, 8(6). https://doi.org/10.31893/multirev.2025157

Häyrynen, S., Keinonen, T., & Kärkkäinen, S. (2021). Promoting Environmental Citizenship Through Local Socio-Cultural Traditions in Science Education. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 12(2), 5–30. https://doi.org/10.2478/dcse-2021-0013

Hernández-Ramos, J., Pernaa, J., Cáceres-Jensen, L., & Rodríguez-Becerra, J. (2021). The effects of using socio-scientific issues and technology in problem-based learning: A systematic review. In Education Sciences (Vol. 11, Issue 10). MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11100640

İpek Akbulut, H., & Demir, O. (2020). Science Teachers’ Views of Socio Scientific Issues. International Journal of Progressive Education, 16(1), 237–256. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2020.228.17

Ke, L., Sadler, T. D., Zangori, L., & Friedrichsen, P. J. (2020). Students’ perceptions of socio-scientific issue-based learning and their appropriation of epistemic tools for systems thinking. International Journal of Science Education, 42(8), 1339–1361. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1759843

Ke, L., Sadler, T. D., Zangori, L., & Friedrichsen, P. J. (2021). Developing and Using Multiple Models to Promote Scientific Literacy in the Context of Socio-Scientific Issues. Science and Education, 30(3), 589–607. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00206-1

Kinoshita, H. (2022). Teaching of Critical Thinking Skills by Science Teachers in Japanese Schools. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 21(5), 801–816. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/22.21.801

López-Fernández, M. del M., González-García, F., & Franco-Mariscal, A. J. (2022). How Can Socio-scientific Issues Help Develop Critical Thinking in Chemistry Education? A Reflection on the Problem of Plastics. Journal of Chemical Education, 99(10), 3435–3442. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.2c00223

Muis, K. R., Chevrier, M., Denton, C. A., & Losenno, K. M. (2021). Epistemic Emotions and Epistemic Cognition Predict Critical Thinking About Socio-Scientific Issues. Frontiers in Education, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.669908

OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 Results Factsheets Indonesia PUBE. https://oecdch.art/a40de1dbaf/C108.

Ozden, M. (2020). Elementary school students’ informal reasoning and its’ quality regarding socio-scientific issues. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 2020(86), 61–84. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2020.86.4

Swanson, J. D., Brock, L., Van Sickle, M., Gutshall, C. A., Russell, L., & Anderson, L. (2020). A Basis for Talent Development: The Integrated Curriculum Model and Evidence-based Strategies. Roeper Review, 42(3), 165–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2020.1765920

Wanti, L., & Chastanti, I. (2023). Analysis of preparation in the independent curriculum implementation: Case study on IPAS learning. BIO-INOVED : Jurnal Biologi-Inovasi Pendidikan, 5(2), 250. https://doi.org/10.20527/bino.v5i2.15493

Zakarina, U., Ramadya, D. A., Sudai, R., & Pattipeillohi. (2024). Integrasi Mata Pelajaran IPA dan IPS dalam Kurikulum Merdeka dalam Upaya Penguatan Literasi Sains dan Sosial di Sekolah Dasar. http://dx.doi.org/10.37905/dej.v4i1.2487

Zvoch, K., Holveck, S., & Porter, L. (2021). Teaching for Conceptual Change in a Density Unit Provided to Seventh Graders: A Comparison of Teacher- and Student-Centered Approaches. Research in Science Education, 51(5), 1395–1421. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-09907-8

Downloads

Published

2025-07-23

How to Cite

Sinyanyuri, S., Rahmawati, Y., & Sumantri, M. S. (2025). NEED ASSESSMENT FOR DEEP LEARNING MODEL THROUGH THE INTEGRATION SOCIO-SCIENTIFIC ISSUES IN ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS . Proceeding of International Seminar on Humanity, Education, and Language, 1(1), 609–615. https://doi.org/10.21009/ishel.v1i1.56522