EXPLORATION OF INTERACTIVE LITERACY IN DEVELOPING STUDENTS' CRITICAL READING SKILLS: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW (SLR) REVIEW
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21009/ishel.v1i1.57376Abstract
This research aims to explore interactive literacy as a tool to develop critical reading skills. Interactive literacy, which includes the use of technology and digital media in the learning process, has become an important focus in higher education due to its ability to stimulate active engagement and critical thinking of students. Through the Systematic Literature Review (SLR) approach, this study reviewed relevant literature related to the application of literacy to improve critical reading skills. The process of searching and selecting articles is carried out by collecting research published in the last five years related to the application of literacy in various disciplines and educational contexts. The analysis was conducted on 150 articles that met the criteria for inclusion and relevance of the topic. The findings of this study show that literacy can improve students' critical reading skills by facilitating digital technology. In addition, literacy encourages students to be more active in exploring texts in depth and critiquing information more sharply, as well as developing the ability to connect new knowledge. Literacy has proven to be effective in improving critical reading skills, because it allows students to collaborate and discuss more openly, especially in improving critical reading skills that are needed in the academic and professional worlds. This study contributes to the development of more effective technology-based learning models in higher education environments.
Keywords: interactive literacy, critical reading, systematic literature review
References
Behrman, E. H. (2006). Teaching about language, power, and text: A review of classroom practices that support critical literacy. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 49(6), 490–498.
Boell, S. K., & Cecez-Kecmanovic, D. (n.d.). On being ‘systematic’in literature. Formulating Research Methods for Information Systems, 48.
Coiro, J., & Hobbs, R. (2017). Digital literacy as collaborative, transdisciplinary, and applied. Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Antonio, TX.
Ennis, R. H. (2011). The nature of critical thinking: An outline of critical thinking dispositions and abilities. University of Illinois, 2(4), 1–8.
Facione, P. A. (2011a). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts. Insight Assessment, 1(1), 1–23.
Facione, P. A. (2011b). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts. Insight Assessment, 1(1), 1–23.
Jones, R. H., & Hafner, C. A. (2021). Understanding digital literacies: A practical introduction. Routledge.
Kitchenham, B. (2007). Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering. Technical Report, Ver. 2.3 EBSE Technical Report. EBSE.
Kitchenham, B., & Charters, S. (2007). Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering. Keele, UK.
Kitchenham, B., Mendes, E., & Travassos, G. H. (2006). A Systematic Review of Cross- vs. Within-Company Cost Estimation Studies. IEEE Transaction on Software Engineering, 33(5). https://doi.org/10.14236/ewic/ease2006.10
Leu, D. J., Forzani, E., Rhoads, C., Maykel, C., Kennedy, C., & Timbrell, N. (2015a). The new literacies of online research and comprehension: Rethinking the reading achievement gap. Reading Research Quarterly, 50(1), 37–59.
Leu, D. J., Forzani, E., Rhoads, C., Maykel, C., Kennedy, C., & Timbrell, N. (2015b). The new literacies of online research and comprehension: Rethinking the reading achievement gap. Reading Research Quarterly, 50(1), 37–59.
Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Clarke, M., Devereaux, P. J., Kleijnen, J., & Moher, D. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: Explanation and elaboration. In PLoS Medicine (Vol. 6, Issue 7). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100
Mason, L., Junyent, A. A., & Tornatora, M. C. (2014). Epistemic evaluation and comprehension of web-source information on controversial science-related topics: Effects of a short-term instructional intervention. Computers & Education, 76, 143–157.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, A. D. (2009). PRISMA 2009 Flow Diagram. In The PRISMA statement (Vol. 6).
O’Brien, D., & Scharber, C. (2008). Digital literacies go to school: Potholes and possibilities. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 52(1), 66–68.
OECD, O. (2018). The future of education and skills: Education 2030. In OECD Education Working Papers (Vol. 23). OECD Publishing.
Page, M. J., & Moher, D. (2017). Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: A scoping review. Systematic Reviews, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0663-8
Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2008). Systematic reviews in the social sciences: A practical guide. British Sociological Association, 42(5).
Rowsell, J., & Walsh, M. (2011a). Rethinking literacy education in new times: Multimodality, multiliteracies & new literacies. Brock Education: A Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 53–62.
Rowsell, J., & Walsh, M. (2011b). Rethinking literacy education in new times: Multimodality, multiliteracies & new literacies. Brock Education: A Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 53–62.
Siddaway, A. P., Wood, A. M., & Hedges, L. V. (2019). How to do a systematic review: a best practice guide for conducting and reporting narrative reviews, meta-analyses, and meta-syntheses. Annual Review of Psychology, 70(1), 747–770.
Silvester, S., Purnasari, P. D., Aurelly, B. T., & Gunawan, R. (2022). Analisis Kemampuan Guru Penggerak Pada Jenjang Sekolah Dasar Di Wilayah Perbatasan Dalam Perspektif Literasi Teknologi Digital. Sebatik, 26(2), 412–419.
Summaries, C. E. (2018). PISA 2018 Results. I.
Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. John Wiley & Sons.
Voogt, J., & Roblin, N. P. (2010). 21st century skills. Discussienota. Zoetermeer: The Netherlands: Kennisnet, 23(03), 2000.
Wardani, L. S. P., & Sabardila, A. (2020). Kualitas Argumentasi Mahasiswa dalam Wacana Debat “Budaya Literasi Sekolah” pada Pembelajaran Keterampilan Berbahasa. Diglosia: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pengajarannya, 3(3), 341–350.
Wisudojati, B., Iswadi, M. K., Aminullah, A. M., & Laelatunnufus, A. (2024). Peningkatan Keterampilan Literasi Berpikir Kritis Pada Pada Siswa Sekolah Menengah Melalui Integrasi Tekhnologi Pendidikan. Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan, 9(3), 1815–1821.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Didah Nurhamidah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
