EVALUATING POETRY WRITING INSTRUCTION THROUGH THE PORTOFOLIO APPROACH: A LITERATURE REVIEW

Authors

  • Saidah Universitas Negeri Jakarta
  • Asep Supriyana Universitas Negeri Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21009/ishel.v1i1.57749

Abstract

This study explores the effectiveness of the portfolio approach in poetry writing instruction through a comprehensive literature review. The research aims to demonstrate how this formative, process-oriented assessment method aligns with contemporary literacy pedagogy that emphasizes creativity, reflection, and learner autonomy. Drawing on peer-reviewed journal articles, academic books, and conference proceedings published between 1985 and 2024, the study employed qualitative content analysis to synthesize theoretical frameworks and empirical findings. Results indicate that portfolio assessment supports three key aspects of poetry instruction: facilitating the creative writing process, enhancing student engagement through reflective learning, and enabling authentic assessment that fosters self-efficacy. By documenting students’ progress from initial ideas to final drafts, portfolios encourage metacognitive awareness and active involvement in learning. The study contributes to the field of Indonesian Language and Literature Education by proposing a conceptual model and offering practical recommendations for implementing portfolio-based pedagogy in poetry writing classrooms. Ultimately, this paper supports the integration of more holistic and student-centered assessment practices that cultivate literary appreciation and writing competence

References

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W.H. Freeman.

Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027

George, M. W. (2008). The elements of library research: What every student needs to know. Princeton University Press.

Listiana, I., Yusuf, F. N., & Isman, S. M. (2020). Portfolio assessment: Benefits for students at different writing proficiency level. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra, 20(2), 243–256. https://doi.org/10.17509/bs_jpbsp.v20i2.33064

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.

Murray, D. (1985). A writer teaches writing (2nd ed.). Houghton Mifflin.

Paulson, F. L., Paulson, P. R., & Meyer, C. A. (1991). What makes a portfolio a portfolio? Educational Leadership, 48(5), 60–63.

Suci, S. (2020). The model of poetry writing learning based on authentic-collaborative assessment in high school. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Learning Innovation and Quality Education (ICLIQE 2020) (pp. 485–491). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200325.106

Zed, M. (2004). Metode penelitian kepustakaan. Yayasan Obor Indonesia.

Downloads

Published

2025-08-18

How to Cite

Saidah, & Supriyana, A. (2025). EVALUATING POETRY WRITING INSTRUCTION THROUGH THE PORTOFOLIO APPROACH: A LITERATURE REVIEW. Proceeding of International Seminar on Humanity, Education, and Language, 1(1), 1261–1266. https://doi.org/10.21009/ishel.v1i1.57749