DEVELOPING A SPOC-BASED ACADEMIC LISTENING MODEL: A PRELIMINARY NEEDS ANALYSIS

Authors

  • Rahman Hakim Universitas Negeri Jakarta
  • Fathiaty Murtadho Universitas Negeri Jakarta
  • Muchlas Suseno Universitas Negeri Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21009/ishel.v2i1.69021

Keywords:

academic listening, spoc, needs analysis, consecutive note-taking, efl learners

Abstract

Academic listening is an essential but challenging skill for EFL learners in higher education. However, limited research has examined students’ needs as a basis for developing online academic listening instruction. This study investigated the needs of Indonesian EFL undergraduates to inform the development of a Small Private Online Course (SPOC)-based Academic Listening model. A qualitative needs-analysis design was conducted as the preliminary phase of a Design and Development Research project. Data were collected through open-ended questionnaires from 36 students enrolled in an Academic Listening course at Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa, Indonesia, and analyzed thematically using ATLAS.ti 9. Five interrelated themes emerged: linguistic challenges, cognitive challenges, emergent consecutive note-taking practices, self-regulated learning challenges, and environmental and technical challenges. Students experienced difficulties with unfamiliar vocabulary, rapid speech, information overload, concentration, and technological constraints. They also employed keywords, abbreviations, symbols, and idea mapping to support comprehension and reduce information loss. These findings suggest that consecutive note-taking serves as a learner-generated cognitive support strategy and provides an empirical basis for designing a SPOC-based Academic Listening model integrating linguistic scaffolding, cognitive support, and self-regulated learning.

References

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.

Flowerdew, J., & Miller, L. (1992). Student perceptions, problems and strategies in second language lecture comprehension. RELC Journal, 23(2), 60-80.

Fox, A. (2013). From MOOCs to SPOCs. Communications of the ACM, 56(12), 38-40.

Ghanipour, [initial to be completed]. (2026). EFL learners' challenges in metacognitive listening intervention. International Journal of Applied Linguistics. Advance online publication.

Graham, S. (2006). Listening comprehension: The learners' perspective. System, 34(2), 165-182.

Hayati, A., & Jalilifar, A. (2009). The impact of note-taking strategies on listening comprehension of EFL learners. English Language Teaching, 2(1), 101-111.

Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Rahimirad, M., & Moini, M. R. (2015). The challenges of listening to academic lectures for EAP learners and the impact of metacognitive strategy training. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 192, 371-379.

Richey, R. C., & Klein, J. D. (2007). Design and development research: Methods, strategies, and issues. Routledge.

Vandergrift, L. (2006). Second language listening: Listening ability or language proficiency? The Modern Language Journal, 90(1), 6-18.

Vandergrift, L., & Goh, C. C. M. (2012). Teaching and learning second language listening: Metacognition in action. Routledge.

Downloads

Published

2026-10-01

How to Cite

Hakim, R., Murtadho, F., & Suseno, M. (2026). DEVELOPING A SPOC-BASED ACADEMIC LISTENING MODEL: A PRELIMINARY NEEDS ANALYSIS. Proceeding of International Seminar on Humanity, Education, and Language, 2(1), 622–630. https://doi.org/10.21009/ishel.v2i1.69021

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2 

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.