DEVELOPMENT OF ECOLINGUISTIC-BASED ARGUMENTATION TEXT TEACHING MATERIALS TO STRENGTHEN ECOLOGICAL LITERACY OF JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS

Authors

  • Exti Budihastuti Universitas Negeri Jakarta
  • Liliana Muliastuti Universitas Negeri Jakarta
  • Yumna Rasyid Universitas Negeri Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21009/ishel.v2i1.69129

Keywords:

ecolinguistics, argumentative writing, teaching materials, ecological literacy, junior secondary school

Abstract

This paper proposes an ecolinguistics-based framework for developing argumentative writing materials to support ecological literacy among junior secondary school students. It employs a conceptual design approach through a focused narrative reading of literature on ecolinguistics, argumentation, language learning materials, and education for sustainable development. The ADDIE framework organizes the proposed development procedures, while the present work is limited to conceptual analysis, instructional design, and prototype specification. The resulting design connects local environmental issues with critical examination of lexical choices, framing, agency, and the visibility of affected living beings. Learning activities guide students to evaluate sources, construct claims supported by evidence and reasoning, address counterarguments, and revise their texts. Two separate assessment rubrics are proposed for argumentative writing and ecological literacy to avoid treating language proficiency as equivalent to environmental understanding. The paper contributes a transparent link between discourse analysis, writing instruction, and ecological reasoning in Indonesian language and literature education. Expert validation, classroom feasibility, and learning effectiveness remain to be investigated empirically.

References

Ardoin, N. M., Bowers, A. W., & Gaillard, E. (2020). Environmental education outcomes for conservation: A systematic review. Biological Conservation, 241, 108224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108224

Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional design: The ADDIE approach. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09506-6

Stibbe, A. (2021). Ecolinguistics: Language, ecology and the stories we live by (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367855512

Tomlinson, B. (2012). Materials development for language learning and teaching. Language Teaching, 45(2), 143–179. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444811000528

Toulmin, S. E. (2003). The uses of argument (Updated ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511840005

UNESCO. (2017). Education for Sustainable Development Goals: Learning objectives. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000247444

UNESCO. (2020). Education for sustainable development: A roadmap. UNESCO. https://doi.org/10.54675/YFRE1448

Downloads

Published

2026-10-01

How to Cite

Budihastuti, E., Muliastuti, L., & Rasyid, Y. (2026). DEVELOPMENT OF ECOLINGUISTIC-BASED ARGUMENTATION TEXT TEACHING MATERIALS TO STRENGTHEN ECOLOGICAL LITERACY OF JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS. Proceeding of International Seminar on Humanity, Education, and Language, 2(1), 631–637. https://doi.org/10.21009/ishel.v2i1.69129

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >> 

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.