Adaptasi dan Uji Psikometri Alat Ukur Coping Strategy Inventory Short-Form (CSI-SF) Versi Indonesia pada Karyawan

Aida Fatonah Nursyamsiah; Nur Izzah Jamilah; Stanike Marsella; Githa Nadia Erlita Putri; Ratih Aryani; Novi Yani; Faza Ardini; Andi Nirmala Syahidah Lukman; Christiany Suwartono

doi:10.21009/JPPP.152.08

Authors

Aida Fatonah Nursyamsiah Program Studi Magister Psikologi, Fakultas Falsafah dan Peradaban, Universitas Paramadina, Jakarta, Indonesia
Nur Izzah Jamilah Program Studi Magister Psikologi, Fakultas Falsafah dan Peradaban, Universitas Paramadina, Jakarta, Indonesia
Stanike Marsella Program Studi Magister Psikologi, Fakultas Falsafah dan Peradaban, Universitas Paramadina, Jakarta, Indonesia
Githa Nadia Erlita Putri Program Studi Magister Psikologi, Fakultas Falsafah dan Peradaban, Universitas Paramadina, Jakarta, Indonesia
Ratih Aryani Program Studi Magister Psikologi, Fakultas Falsafah dan Peradaban, Universitas Paramadina, Jakarta, Indonesia
Novi Yani Program Studi Magister Psikologi, Fakultas Falsafah dan Peradaban, Universitas Paramadina, Jakarta, Indonesia
Faza Ardini Program Studi Magister Psikologi, Fakultas Falsafah dan Peradaban, Universitas Paramadina, Jakarta, Indonesia
Andi Nirmala Syahidah Lukman Program Studi Magister Psikologi, Fakultas Falsafah dan Peradaban, Universitas Paramadina, Jakarta, Indonesia
Christiany Suwartono Fakultas Psikologi, Universitas Katolik Indonesia Atma Jaya, Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21009/JPPP.152.08

Keywords:

Adaptasi Lintas Budaya, karyawan, Properti Psikometrik

Abstract

Workplace demands, including heavy workloads, time pressure, role conflict, and limited job control, may increase psychological distress. However, coping assessment among Indonesian employees remains limited by the lack of culturally adapted instruments with robust psychometric evidence. This study aimed to adapt and evaluate the psychometric properties of the Indonesian version of the Coping Strategies Inventory–Short Form (CSI-SF) among employees. A quantitative psychometric study using a cross-sectional design was conducted with 313 adult workers from various occupational sectors, aged 24 to 64 years (M=36.00,SD=9.55). Based on gender characteristics, the majority of participants were male (n=209;66.8%), while females accounted for 104 participants (33.2%). Participants' psychological distress scores ranged from 1 to 10, with a mean score of 3.95 (SD=2.46). The adaptation process included forward translation, back-translation, semantic review, and readability testing. Data were analyzed using item-rest correlations, internal consistency testing, Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA), Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), and convergent validity assessment based on relations to other variables. The total scale showed satisfactory internal consistency (Cronbach’s α=.753). EFA supported a four-factor structure that represented the data better than the original theoretical model, although several items shifted across factors, indicating cultural differences in coping interpretation. Convergent validity was supported by a positive association between disengagement emotion-focused coping and psychological distress, as well as significant gender differences in emotion-focused coping. These findings emphasize the importance of incorporating cultural context into coping measurement within the Indonesian workplace environment. Overall, the Indonesian CSI-SF demonstrated satisfactory reliability and construct validity for assessing Indonesian employees coping strategies.

References

Addison, C. C., Campbell-Jenkins, B. W., Sarpong, D. F., Kibler, J., Singh, M., Dubbert, P., & Taylor, H. (2007). Psychometric evaluation of a Coping Strategies Inventory Short-Form (CSI-SF) in the Jackson Heart Study cohort. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 4(4), 289–295. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph2007040006

Beaton, D. E., Bombardier, C., Guillemin, F., & Ferraz, M. B. (2000). Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine, 25(24), 3186–3191. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014

Chun, C. A., Moos, R. H., & Cronkite, R. C. (2006). Culture: A theory-based framework for coping research. Dalam P. T. P. Wong & L. C. J. Wong (Penyunting), Handbook of multicultural perspectives on stress and coping (hlm. 29–53). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-26238-5_2

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312

Hambleton, R. K., Merenda, P. F., & Spielberger, C. D. (2004). Adapting Educational and Psychological Tests for Cross-Cultural Assessment. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Hayes, A. F., & Coutts, J. J. (2020). Use omega rather than Cronbach’s alpha for estimating reliability. But…. Communication Methods and Measures, 14(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2020.1718629

Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118

Irawanto, D. W. (2009). An analysis of paternalistic leadership and employee job satisfaction in a Indonesian state-owned enterprise. Public Responsibility and Governance, 1(1), 41–56.

Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, Appraisal, and Coping. New York: Springer Publishing Company.

Machado, E. S., de Araújo, T. M., de Sousa, C. C., Freitas, A. M. C., Souza, F. de O., & Lua, I. (2022). Occupational stress and common mental disorders: How do coping strategies work? BMC Public Health, 22, Article 1751. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-14156-6

Mangundjaya, W. L. (2013). Is there clinical cultural differences in Indonesia? International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 3(6), 512–515. https://doi.org/10.7763/IJSSH.2013.V3.298

Mokkink, L. B., Prinsen, C. A. C., Patrick, D. L., Alonso, J., Bouter, L. M., de Vet, H. C. W., & Terwee, C. B. (2018). COSMIN methodology for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Quality of Life Research, 27, 1147–1157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1798-3

Obbarius, N., Fischer, F., Liegl, G., Obbarius, A., & Rose, M. (2021). A modified version of the transactional stress concept according to Lazarus and Folkman was confirmed in a psychosomatic sample. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 584333. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.584333

Penley, J. A., Tomaka, J., & Wiebe, J. S. (2002). The association of coping to physical and psychological health outcomes: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 25, 551–603. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020641400589

Samuel, D. B. (2017). A review of exploratory factor analysis and its applications in psychological research. Psychological Assessment, 29(11), 1363–1376.

Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2010). A Beginner’s Guide to Structural Equation Modeling (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.

Speyer, E., Hertlein, J., Mohr, P., & Schmid, M. (2016). Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Coping Strategies Inventory. Journal of Health Psychology, 21(8), 1681–1692.

Tamres, L. K., Janicki, D., & Helgeson, V. S. (2002). Sex differences in coping behavior: A meta-analytic review and an examination of relative coping. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6(1), 2–30. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0601_1

Tobin, D. L., Holroyd, K. A., Reynolds, R. V., & Wigal, J. K. (1989). The hierarchical factor structure of the Coping Strategies Inventory. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 13, 343–361. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01173478

Tous-Pallarés, J., Bonasa-Jiménez, M. P., & Blanch-Plana, A. (2022). Psychometric properties of the Coping Strategies Inventory–Short Form in Spanish workers. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(19), 12472. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912472

World Health Organization. (2024). Mental health at work. Geneva: World Health Organization.

Zijlmans, E. A. O., Tijmstra, J., van der Ark, L. A., & Sijtsma, K. (2018). Item-score reliability in empirical-data-based item selection. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 78(5), 885–900.