PELATIHAN INSTALASI KELISTRIKAN RUMAH TANGGA SEBAGAI UPAYA PENCEGAHAN BAHAYA KEBAKARAN BAGI MASYARAKAT KECAMATAN JATINEGARA JAKARTA TIMUR MELALUI PENDEKATAN EDUKATIF
Keywords:
Training, Checking, Repairing, Installation, FireAbstract
Household Electrical Installation Training as a Fire Prevention Effort for the Community of Jatinegara District, East Jakarta Through Educational Approaches will be conducted at the Jatinegara District office by involving a certified installer accompanied by 5 (five) final year students of the Electrical Engineering Education Study Program at the Faculty of Engineering, State University Jakarta, which participated in the Real Work Lecture (KKN) program. Participants who will take part in this activity are youth youths, community leaders, electricians, builders with the duration of the implementation of activities for a full month including the provision of knowledge about electrical installation standards, the threat of fire from electrical installations not according to standards, electrical installation engineering skills according standards, checking citizens' electrical installations, and data collection, checking and repairing electrical installations in people's homes that are not in accordance with PUIL 2011 standards. This activity is one of the programs that is given on an annual basis to communities in the target area as part of the application of knowledge knowledge in the community. The methods used in this activity include lectures, questions and answers, demonstrations, practices, and observations as well as data collection, checking and improvement directly in the community with an educational approach. Evaluation of the success of the program will be known through the provision of pre and post test to all participants including the instrument of satisfaction of the implementation of training activities. From the evaluation results there were 99% of participants feeling satisfied with the training activities. Of the 99% of participants, there were 35% who strongly agreed and 64% agreed on the relevance of the material and the expectations of the participants. And only 1% of participants who expressed disagreement about the relevance of the material and expectations of participants