Analysis of Descriptive Text Writing Skill Characteristics Based on Performance-Based Assessment for Junior High School Level
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21009/AKSIS.070201Kata Kunci:
assessment tools, descriptive text writing skills, performance-based assessmentAbstrak
This research aims to develop a performance-based assessment model for descriptive text writing skills at the junior high school level. The success of the learning process for descriptive text writing skills in junior high school can be seen in the learning outcomes achieved by students. These learning outcomes are obtained through assessments conducted by teachers at school. However, in reality, teachers face difficulties in developing assessment tools for descriptive text writing skills. These difficulties are addressed by developing a performance-based assessment model for descriptive text writing skills. The research method used in developing the ADDIE model for skills assessment is Research and Development. The ADDIE model consists of five steps: (1) analysis; (2) design for performance-based descriptive text writing; (3) development; (4) implementation; and (5) evaluation. The results of this research include the characteristics of the assessment model for Indonesian language learning at the junior high school level.
Referensi
Chabot, Costa, M., Chaffey, & Cabrillo. (2014). Choosing the right assessment method : Pre-test / Post-test evaluation. Boston University, 2013–2014.
Dudung, A. (2018). Penilaian Psikomotor. Karima, 1–220.
Hermawan, D. (2018). Kesantunan Berbahasa Pada Anak Usia 11 Tahun (Studi Kasus terhadap Anak Usia 11 Tahun). Metamorfosis | Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra Indonesia Dan Pengajarannya, 11(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.55222/metamorfosis.v11i1.23
Kasenda, L. M., Sentinuwo, S., & Tulenan, V. (2016). Sistem Monitoring Kognitif, Afektif dan Psikomotorik Siswa Berbasis Android. Jurnal Teknik Informatika, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.35793/jti.9.1.2016.14808
Kemendikbud. (2016). Salinan Permendikbud Nomor 23 tahun 2016 Tentang Standar Penilaian Pendidikan. 2016, (Standar Penilaian Pendidikan), 1–12. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1011.1669%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1751-8113/44/8/085201
Lia, Z. (2022). Penilaian Proses dan Hasil Pembelajaran. Retrieved from https://cdn-ppg.simpkb.id/s3/daljab/PPG 2022/Prajab/Asesmen PGSD I/T5/Penilaian Proses dan Hasil Pembelajaran.pdf
Nafiati, D. A. (2021). Revisi Taksonomi Bloom: Kognitif, Afektif, dan Psikomotorik. Humanika, 21(2), 151–172. https://doi.org/10.21831/hum.v21i2.29252
Nurmasyitah, & Hudiyatman. (2015). Kendala Guru dalam Merumuskan Instrumen Penilaian pada Pembelajran. 3(1), 48–62.
Nurmisanti, Kurniawan, Y., & Muliyani, R. (2017). Identifikasi Hasil Belajar Ranah Kognitif Siswa pada Materi Fluida Statis. 2(1), 17–18.
Prasetyo, T. (2017). Pengembangan Perangkat Penilaian Hasil Belajar dalam Pembelajaran Tematik Integratif Kelas V SD. Jurnal Prima Edukasia, 5(1), 102–111. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpe.v5i1.7528
Puspendik. (2019). Panduan Penilaian Kinerja (Performance Assessment). Pusat Penilaian Pendidikan, 59.
Qadar, R., Rustaman, N. Y., & Suhandi, A. (2015). Mengakses Aspek Afektif dan Kognitif pada Pembelajaran Optika dengan Pendekatan Demonstrasi Interaktif. Jurnal Inovasi dan Pembelajaran Fisika, 2(1), 7. Retrieved from http://repository.unmul.ac.id/handle/123456789/1812
Rifdarmon, R. (2020). Analisis Kebutuhan Penilaian Psikomotor Berdasarkan Video Tutorial Berlandaskan Manualbook pada Pendidikan Vokasi Guna Meningkatkan Pencapaian Learning Target. Invotek: Jurnal Inovasi Vokasional Dan Teknologi, 20(3), 89–96. https://doi.org/10.24036/invotek.v20i3.738
Suryani, Nunuk., & Leo Agung S. (2012). Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Yogyakarta: Ombak.
