Preconceptions on Deddy Corbuzier’s Close the Door Podcast May 2025 Edition: The People of Papua Are Hungry

Penulis

  • Rizky Anggraini Universitas PGRI Adi Buana Surabaya
  • Rahayu Pujiastuti Universitas PGRI Adi Buana Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21009.Aksis.100105

Kata Kunci:

presupposition, Close the Door podcast, the People of Papua are Hungry

Abstrak

This study aims to describe the types of preconceptions found in the May 2025 edition of Deddy Corbuzier's Close the Door podcast with the theme The People of Papua are Hungry. This study uses a qualitative approach with a descriptive method. The research data consists of narratives from sources that contain preconceptions. The data sources were obtained from seven Close the Door podcast videos aired in May 2025. Data collection techniques were carried out through documentation, downloading, non-participant observation, and recording. Data analysis techniques were carried out by describing. The data analysis procedure was carried out by transcribing, classifying, coding, interpreting, and concluding. The results of the study show that the presuppositions in Deddy Corbuzier's podcast edition of May 2025, themed ‘The Hungry People of Papua’, include existential, factual, lexical, structural, non-factual, and counterfactual presuppositions. Existential presuppositions arise when objects, figures, places, or groups are considered real. Factual presuppositions affirm facts or experiences that actually occurred. Lexical presuppositions indicate changes in circumstances, habits, or achievements. Structural presuppositions arise through the question words what, who, where, and when. Non-factual presuppositions mark imaginary or simulated activities. Counterfactual presuppositions present scenarios or desires that contradict reality, such as if, for example, hoping, wanting.

Referensi

Anistia, H., & Arifianti, I. (2024). Bentuk dan Fungsi Praanggapan Leksikal Teori Ika Valensia dalam Persidangan Kasus Brigadir Yosua. Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan, 10(19), 403-413. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14190594.

Ayudiyah, A., Maharani, M., & Sulistyowati, H. (2025). Analisis Praanggapan dalam Podcast “LLDikti II dan Masa Depan Pendidikan Lewat MBKM” Arizah. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, 13(3). 38−51.

Corbuzier, D. (2025a). Chef Arnold: Dia “Peras” Temen Gue Sampe Ancur Hidupnya Gara2 Codeblu.. Ancur‼. Indonesia: Youtube. Https://Youtu.Be/W1dw_Xi3g_8?Si=Jgtqgumdw4fd__T5

Corbuzier, D. (2025b). Gue Harus Tanya! Hukum Tajam Kebawah Tumpul Keatas Masyarakat Pusing Capek. Indonesia: Youtube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wYqDUAzBoGM.

Corbuzier, D. (2025c). Hei Rakyat Papua Lapar Pejabatnya Mabuk-Mabukan Musuh Kami Bukan Tni, tapi…. Indonesia: Youtube. Https://Youtu.Be/M09097hiiow?Si=P9tvooqecv-Uosbb

Corbuzier, D. (2025d). Lihat Saja Papua Sebentar lagi Meledak Pak Prabowo Tolong.. Saya Papua, Saya Tni, Saya Capek‼. Indonesia: Youtube. Https://Youtu.Be/Lrjj6vstctw?Si=Mlpond6fmc52xldb

Corbuzier, D. (2025e). Megawati: Welcome to Konoha Kayanya Mending Balik ke Orde Baru Aja. Indonesia: Youtube. Https://Youtu.Be/Rh8jigre3f4?Si=Dfqgpsugjlucbfvi

Corbuzier, D. (2025f). Pak Jokowi, Ibu Megawati Baikan.. Wah Gokil Pak Gub Cuma Mau Ngomong Disini Pramono Anung. Indonesia: Youtube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5yKbU-EWfLg.

Lembayung, A. (2024). Analisis Praanggapan dalam Serial Web Gadis Kretek : Kajian Pragmatik. 3(2), 352–356. Https://Online-Journal.Unja.Ac.Id/Kal

Mardliyah, S. A. (2021). Pelanggaran Praanggapan dan Implikatur dalam Stand Up Comedy Indra Frimawan. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan 2(5).

Mono, R., Putri, A., & Putri, D. (2019). Praanggapan Pragmatik: Strategi Memahami Teks Artikel (Pertama). Medan: Walashri Press.

Musawwir. (2021). Realisasi Prinsip Kerja Sama Percakapan dalam Acara Hitam Putih Di Trans7. 3(2), 85–98.

Nasrul & Alwi, A. K. (2025). Praanggapan dan Entailment dalam Podcast Youtube Najwa Shihab Bersama “Prabowo Subianto Bicara Gagasan” (Kajian Pragmatik). Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, 15(1), 103–119. Https://Doi.Org/10.23887/Jpbsi.V15i1.93177

Oktaviani, R., & Chan, S. M. (2023). Development of Short Story Writing with Religious Values Through Problem-Based Learning. Aksis: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, 7(2), 161–172. Https://Doi.Org/Https://Doi.Org/10.21009/Aksis.070205

Santika, D. (2019). Praanggapan dalam Acara Talk Show Mata Najwa di Stasiun Televisi Swasta Trans7. Skripsi. Pakanbaru: Universitas Islam Riau.

Savitri, R. E. (2021). Analisis Praanggapan dan Implikatur Percakapan dalam Film Pendek Tilik ( Kajian Pragmatik ). Jurnal Iswara, 1(2), 96−112. Http://Jos.Unsoed.Ac.Id/Index.Php/Iswara/Index

Silaban, A. D., Amirulloh, M., & Rafianti, L. (2020). Podcast : Penyiaran atau Layanan Konten Audio Melalui Internet ( Over The Top ) Berdasarkan Hukum Positif di Indonesia. Jurnal Legalitas, 13(2), 132–146. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33756/jelta.v13i02.8325.

Sudrajat, I., & Pujiastuti, R. (2023). Praanggapan dalam Sepilihan Cerpen Sepasang Sepatu Tua Karya Sapardi Djoko Damono. Bahtera Indonesia, 8(2), 475–489.

Vaniandini, M. N., Hutubessy, E. D., & Adhima, F. (2022). Praanggapan pada Komentar Unggahan Akun Instagram Faktastisch tentang Berita Covid-19 di Indonesia. Brila: Journal of Foreign Language Education, 2(1), 27–35.

Warozukni, Charlina, & Sinaga, M. (2022). Praanggapan dalam Novel Pulang Karya Tere Liye. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 6(3),13864–13870.

Yule, G. (2018). Pragmatik (Cetakan 3). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Diterbitkan

2026-06-26