The Effect of Flash Sale on Purchasing Decisions: A Theoretical Approach

Authors

  • Ahmad Saoki Andriyana Universitas Negeri Jakarta
  • Suparno Suparno Faculty of Economic, State University of Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Agus Wibowo Universitas Negeri Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21009/ISC-BEAM.011.46

Keywords:

Discount, Flash Sale, Purchasing Decision

Abstract

The current research was explored to analyze the Effect of Flash Sale on Purchasing Decisions on E-commerce. By applying a qualitative method, this research carried out to explore the prepositions of promotion study and conceptualized flash sale promotion as a promotional tool. The data collection technique applied a literature survey. The literature survey outlined some of the findings of previous researchers' references and elaborated the study using grounded theory. This research, methodically, was expected to be able to explain flash sales, and purchasing decisions. The findings proved that Flash Sale promotions had a positive and significant influence on purchasing decisions, and encouraged impulse buying behavior on various platforms, such as Shopee and Lazada. Flash Sales provided attractive price reductions for consumers, encouraging them to make purchasing decisions. The results also showed that promotional strategies such as Flash Sale and Free Shipping offers promoted a positive impact on increasing product sales and influencing consumer purchasing decisions.

 

Keywords: Discount, Flash Sale, Purchasing Decision

References

Aksan, Nilgun, Buket Kisac, Mufit Aydin dan Sumeyra Demiburken. (2008). World Conference

on Educational Sciences 2009 (Symbolic Interaction Theory).

Annur, Cindy Mutia. Kasus perceraian di Indonesia melonjak, diperoleh dari https://databoks.katadata.co.id/datapublish/2023/03/01/kasus-perceraian-di-indonesia-melonjak-lagi-pada-2022-tertinggi-dalam-enam-tahun-terakhir dikunjungi pada September, 18 2021

Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Traditions. Third Edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Derung, Teresia Noiman. (2017). Interaksionisme Simbolik dalam Kehidupan Bermasyarakat, Vol. 2 No. 1

Dihni, Vika Azkiya. Maraknya kasus perceraian di Indonesia, diperoleh dari https://databoks.katadata.co.id/datapublish/2022/06/21/kasus-perceraian-di-indonesia-masih-marak-ini-penyebabnya dikunjungi pada September, 18 2021

Finlay, Linda. (2013). Unfolding the Phenomenological Research Process Iterative Stages of

“Seeing Afresh”. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 53 (2): 172 – 201.

Firdha, Merry dan Meria Octavianti. (2016). Konstruksi Makna Kencan di Situs Pencarian

Jodoh Tinder (Studi Fenomenologi Pada Pria Pengguna Tinder di Jakarta).

Firdiana, Cervia, Eko Harry Susanto dan Sisca Aulia. (2020). Penggunaan Media Sosial Tinder

dan Fenomena Pergaulan Bebas di Indonesia, 4 (1), 112-118

Littlejohn, S. W. (2002). Theories of Human Communication. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

Littlejohn, S. W., & Foss, K. A. (2005). Theories of human communication. Belmont, Calif: Thomson/Wadsworth.

Littlejohn, S. w., & Foss, K. A. (2008). Theories of Human Communication. Ninth edition. Singapore: Cengage learning asia Pte Ltd.

Littlejohn, Stephen W & Karen A. Foss.(2009). Teori Komunikasi, edisi 9. Jakarta: Salemba Humanika

Littlejohn, Stephen W., and Karen A. Foss. (2011). Theories of Human Communication. 10th.

Kuswarno, Engkus. (2009). Metodologi Penelitian Komunikasi Fenomenologi; Konsepsi, Pedoman, dan Contoh Penelitian, Bandung: Widya Padjajaran.

Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. (2002). Phenomenology of Perception. Routledge Classics.

Miller, K. (2005). Communication Theories: Perspectives, Processes, and Contexts. McGraw-Hill.

Mulyana, D. (2008). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Mulyana, Deddy, Dadang Rahmat Hidayat, Siti Karlinah, Susanne Dida, Tine Silvana Rachmawati, Asep Suryana & Jenny Ratna Suminar. (2018). Komunikasi Kesehatan: Pemikiran dan Penelitian. Bandung: Rosda.

Orbe, M. P. (2009). Fenomenologi.

Ronda, Andi Mirza. (2018). Tafsir kontemporer ilmu komunikasi. Tangerang: Indigo Media.

Rosenberg, K. P. (2018). Infidelity: Why men and women cheat. Da Capo Press.

Sari, Widya Permata dan Rina Sari Kusuma. (2018). Presentasi Diri dalam Kencan Online pada

Situs dan Aplikasi Setipe dan Tinder, Vol 11 No. 2

Smith, Jonathan A. (2006). Qualitative Psychology: Practical Guide to Research Methods. New Delhi: Sage.

Sugiyono. (2018). Metode Penelitian Kombinasi (Mixed Methods). Bandung: CV Alfabeta

Sohn, Brian Kelleher dkk. (2017). Hearing The Voices of Students and Teachers: A Phenomenological Approach to Educational Research. Qualitative Research in Education, Vol. 6 No. 2, June 2017. DOI: 10.17583/are.2017.2374

Wagers, F. S. (2008). The Relationship, If Any, Between Marriage and Infidelity. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy: Innovations in Clinical and Educational Interventions, 135-148.

West, Richard dan Turner, Lynn H. (2009). Pengantar Teori Komunikasi: Analisis dan Aplikasi (Introducing Communication Theory: Analysis and Application). Jakarta: Salemba Humanika.

Zare, B. (2011). Review of studies on Infidelity. In 3rd International Conference on Advanced Management Science (pp. 182-186).

Downloads

Published

2024-02-23

How to Cite

Andriyana, A. S., Suparno, S., & Wibowo, A. . (2024). The Effect of Flash Sale on Purchasing Decisions: A Theoretical Approach. International Student Conference on Business, Education, Economics, Accounting, and Management (ISC-BEAM), 1(1), 651–658. https://doi.org/10.21009/ISC-BEAM.011.46