DEVELOPMENT OF A MODULE-BASED DIGITAL LITERACY COURSE LEARNING MODEL: A NEEDS-DRIVEN APPROACH
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21009/ishel.v1i1.57322Abstract
Rapid technological advances in the 21st century have positioned digital literacy as a fundamental competency for academic and professional success. However, educational institutions often face challenges in implementing structured, effective, and engaging digital literacy instruction. This study addresses this gap by detailing the development of a module-based learning model for a university-level digital literacy course. The study employed a Research and Development (R&D) methodology, employing Dick and Carey’s systematic model to guide the instructional design process. The initial phase involved a thorough needs assessment to identify instructional objectives and analyze learner characteristics, using a survey with 100 students and semi-structured interviews to determine core competency gaps. Findings from the needs assessment directly informed the development of performance objectives, assessment instruments, and student-centered modular learning strategies. The needs assessment results revealed significant demand for practical skills in three key areas: (1) information and data literacy, (2) collaboration and utilization of digital applications, and (3) digital content creation. The product developed was a flexible learning model consisting of ten independent learning activities with project-based assessments. Expert validation by specialists in instructional technology and curriculum design confirmed the high validity, feasibility, and relevance of the model. The study concluded that a needs assessment-driven approach is essential to creating impactful digital literacy education. The resulting module-based model provides a practical, adaptable, and validated framework for higher education institutions aiming to foster essential digital competencies.
References
Brame, C. J. (2016). Effective educational videos: Principles and guidelines for maximizing student learning from video content. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 15(4), es6. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-03-0125
Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. O. (2015). The systematic design of instruction (8th ed.). Pearson.
Gall, M.D., Gall, J.P., & Borg, W.R. (2007). Educational research: An introduction (8th ed.). Pearson.
Instefjord, E. J., & Munthe, E. (2017). Educating digitally competent teachers: A study of integration of professional digital competence in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 63, 185–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.12.016
Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60-70.
Livingstone, S. (2012). Critical reflections on the research on children and young people's internet use. In SHKPHSSSSJ (Ed.), The handbook of children, media, and development (pp. 41-54). Wiley-Blackwell.
Mayer, R.E. (2014). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (2007). Interactive multimedia environments. In JM Spector, MD Merrill, J. van Merriënboer, & MP Driscoll (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (3rd ed., pp. 609-623). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Naufal, HA (2021). Digital Literacy. Perspectives, 1 (2), 195-202.
Ng, W. (2012). Can we teach digital natives digital literacy? Computers & Education, 59 (4), 1065–1078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.016
Safitri, F., Ramlah, R., & Sandy, W. (2025). Digital Literacy in Education . PT. Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia.
Schwab, K. (2017). The fourth industrial revolution. Crown Business.
Suryani, AS, & Hamdu, G. (2021). The development of module based on problem based learning to improve digital literacy of elementary school students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1806 (1), 012166. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1806/1/012166
Van Laar, E., van Deursen, AJAM, van Dijk, JAGM, & de Haan, J. (2017). The relationship between 21st-century skills and digital skills: A systematic literature review. Computers in Human Behavior, 72 , 577–588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.010
Voogt, J., & Roblin, N. P. (2012). A comparative analysis of international frameworks for 21st century competencies: Implications for national curriculum policies. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44 (3), 299–321.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 fatikhatun najikhah najikhah, Moch sukardjo, M Japar

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.