LINGUISTIC SYMBOLS IN THE POLICE'S BAP OF LINGUISTS FROM AN ANTHROPOHISTORICAL SEMIOTIC PERSPECTIVE

Authors

  • Erfi Firmansyah LT Pascasarjana UNJ
  • Liliana Muliastuti Universitas Negeri Jakarta
  • Miftahulkhairah Anwar Universitas Negeri Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21009/ishel.v1i1.57332

Keywords:

linguistic symbols, anthropohistorical semiotics, legal literacy

Abstract

This study analyses the linguistic symbol instruments in the Investigative Report (BAP) of Language Experts in criminal cases related to the ITE Law at Polda Metro Jaya using an Anthrohistorical semiotic approach. The study attempts to reveal the linguistic aspects in the BAP reflecting power relations, gender bias, and ideological constructions underlying the legal process. The use of legal terminology and formal language structures strengthens the position of the authority of legal institutions, while gender bias is identified in terms that reinforce certain stereotypes. The results of the study explain that the case analysed contributed to the linguistic symbol instruments in criminal cases related to violations of the ITE Law at Polda Metro Jaya. The linguistic symbol instruments are the words 'main-main dan dengar-dengar'. The words 'main-main dan dengar-dengar' indicate linguistic symbols related to the ITE Law. In disclosing the linguistic symbols of the BAP in the police in its application, of course, it is still necessary to pay attention to the social, cultural, and historical contexts that influence the birth of the text in the context of its use.

References

Coulthard, M., & Johnson, A. (2010). The Routledge Handbook of Forensic Linguistics. London: Routledge.

Creswell, J. W. (2016). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Eco, U. (1976). A Theory of Semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Eriyanto. (2021). Analisis Wacana: Pengantar Analisis Teks Media. Jakarta: Kencana.

Foucault, M. (1995). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Vintage Books.

Gibbons, J. (2003). Forensic Linguistics: An Introduction to Language in the Justice System. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Murray, N., & Moore, S. (2019). The Language of Law and the Foundations of American Constitutionalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Peirce, C. S. (1931). Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Vols. 1–6. Harvard University Press.

Piliang, Y. A. (2022). Semiotika dan Dinamika Sosial Budaya. Bandung: Simbiosa Rekatama Media.

Solan, L. M., & Tiersma, P. M. (2005). Speaking of Crime: The Language of Criminal Justice. University of Chicago Press.

van Dijk, T. A. (2008). Discourse and Power. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Zhou, L., & McKeown, K. R. (2020). Generating factual and concise summaries of long legal documents. Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 1410–1420.

Downloads

Published

2025-07-14

How to Cite

Firmansyah, E., Muliastuti, L., & Anwar, M. (2025). LINGUISTIC SYMBOLS IN THE POLICE’S BAP OF LINGUISTS FROM AN ANTHROPOHISTORICAL SEMIOTIC PERSPECTIVE . Proceeding of International Seminar on Humanity, Education, and Language, 1(1), 227–235. https://doi.org/10.21009/ishel.v1i1.57332

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >> 

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.