BETWEEN KNOWLEDGE AND ACTION: DIGITAL COMMUNICATION ETHICS AND CIVIC LITERACY ON SOCIAL MEDIA AMONG GENERATION Z AT SMAN 1 CISAAT

Authors

  • Rany Safitri Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Dasim Budimansyah Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21009/ishel.v2i1.68303

Keywords:

civic literacy, digital communication ethics, Generation Z, social media, citizenship education, Pancasila Education

Abstract

This study examines the gap between students’ theoretical understanding and their actual behavior regarding digital communication ethics and civic literacy in online spaces, with a particular focus on Generation Z students at SMAN 1 Cisaat, Sukabumi. The rapid spread of social media has fundamentally reshaped how young citizens engage in civic life, while simultaneously confronting them with ethical dilemmas that demand coherence between normative awareness and real-world digital conduct. Using a qualitative case study design, this research traces how Grade XI students make sense of, internalize, and put into practice the principles of civic literacy in their daily digital lives especially on platforms such as Instagram, TikTok, and WhatsApp. Twenty-four students from twelve classes (XI-1 to XI-12) participated in the study, with two students per class selected through purposive sampling based on their level of social media engagement and their willingness to take part. Data were gathered through in-depth interviews, direct observation of participants’ online interactions, and analysis of relevant documents. The findings point to a notable discrepancy between students’ stated understanding of digital communication ethics  including issues such as hoax dissemination, hate speech, and civil online discourse and how they actually behave in digital environments. Several interrelated factors appear to sustain this gap: the strong pull of peer group dynamics, the tendency of platform algorithms to amplify emotionally provocative content, and the insufficient embedding of civic digital ethics within existing citizenship education frameworks. This study contends that civic literacy in the digital era must be understood not merely as a matter of factual knowledge, but as something that encompasses dispositional formation and the capacity for critical, reflective thinking. The findings carry practical implications for the development of Pancasila and Citizenship Education (PKn) curricula at the senior secondary level, and contribute to the growing scholarly conversation around cultivating responsible digital citizens in the Indonesian context.

References

Alrakhman, R., & Fauzi, A. (2025). Navigating the digital landscape: The role of digital citizenship education in cultivating ethical social media behavior. Proceedings of the 5th Annual Civic Education Conference (5th ACEC 2024). Atlantis Press.

Bakshy, E., Messing, S., & Adamic, L. A. (2015). Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook. Science, 348(6239), 1130–1132. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa1160

Banks, J. A. (2008). Diversity, group identity, and citizenship education in a global age. Educational Researcher, 37(3), 129–139. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08317501

Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1991). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Penguin Books.

BPIP. (2022). Peraturan Badan Pembinaan Ideologi Pancasila Nomor 4 Tahun 2022 tentang indikator nilai Pancasila. Badan Pembinaan Ideologi Pancasila.

Budimansyah, D. (2026a). Sosiologi kewarganegaraan: Perspektif Nusantara dan global. CV Jendela Hasanah.

Budimansyah, D. (2026b). The civic knowledge-action paradox: Civic sensibility and the limits of rational citizenship. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour. Advance online publication.

Budimansyah, D., Suryadi, K., & Winataputra, U. S. (2022). Moral Citizenship Nusantara: Kewargaan sebagai praktik bermoral berlandaskan nilai-nilai lokal. Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan, 15(2), 89–104.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage.

DataReportal. (2024). Digital 2024: Indonesia. https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2024-indonesia

Hochschild, A. R. (1979). Emotion work, feeling rules, and social structure. American Journal of Sociology, 85(3), 551–575. https://doi.org/10.1086/227049

Kemkomdigi. (2023). Panduan etika komunikasi digital. Kementerian Komunikasi dan Digital Republik Indonesia.

Downloads

Published

2026-10-13

How to Cite

Safitri, R., & Budimansyah, D. (2026). BETWEEN KNOWLEDGE AND ACTION: DIGITAL COMMUNICATION ETHICS AND CIVIC LITERACY ON SOCIAL MEDIA AMONG GENERATION Z AT SMAN 1 CISAAT. Proceeding of International Seminar on Humanity, Education, and Language, 2(1), 999–1009. https://doi.org/10.21009/ishel.v2i1.68303

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.