OPTIMIZING SELF REGULATED LEARNING THROUGH A GOOGLE SITES BASED ASYNCHRONOUS LEARNING MODEL FOR WORKING STUDENTS

Authors

  • Ahmad Fauzi Universitas Negeri Jakarta
  • Robinson Situmorang Universitas Negeri Jakarta
  • Uwes Anis Chaeruman Universitas Negeri Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21009/ishel.v2i1.68777

Keywords:

self regulated learning, working students, asynchronous learning, google sites, adult learners, time poverty, higher education

Abstract

Working students frequently experience severe "time poverty" and cognitive fatigue. This study investigates optimizing SRL among working students by implementing a lightweight, user-friendly asynchronous learning model based on Google Sites. Utilizing a quasi-experimental pretest/posttest non-equivalent control group design, the study examined 120 working students enrolled in an employee class program. Participants were assigned to an experimental group utilizing the Google Sites intervention or a control group utilizing a standard institutional LMS. Data were collected using the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ) and analyzed via multivariate analysis of covariance (MANCOVA). The findings demonstrate that the experimental group exhibited statistically significant and robust improvements in both motivational beliefs (intrinsic goal orientation and task value) and self-regulated learning strategies (metacognitive self-regulation and time/study environment management) compared to the control group. The structured, linear, and cognitively accessible architectural design of Google Sites effectively scaffolded the forethought and self-reflection phases of Zimmerman’s cyclical model of SRL. The study concludes that deploying lightweight digital platforms significantly reduces extraneous cognitive load, empowering time-poor working students to use effective self-regulatory strategies.

References

Broadbent, J., & Poon, W. L. (2015). Self-regulated learning strategies & academic achievement in online higher education learning environments: A systematic review. The Internet and Higher Education, 27(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.04.007

Ebener, S. (2017). Using Google tools to enhance secondary writing instruction. Graduate Research Papers, 135. https://scholarworks.uni.edu/grp/135

Howard, J. L., Bureau, J., Guay, F., Chong, J. X., & Ryan, R. M. (2021). Student motivation and associated outcomes: A meta-analysis from self-determination theory. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(6), 1300–1323. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620966789

Lin, X. (2019). Self-regulated learning strategies of adult learners regarding non-native status, gender, and study majors. Journal of Global Education and Research, 3(1), 58–70. https://doi.org/10.5038/2577-509X.3.1.1018

Paris, S. G., & Paris, A. H. (2001). Classroom applications of research on self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 36(2), 89–101. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3602_4

Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1991). A manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning.

Pintrich, P. R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 385–407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-004-0006-x

Prayogi, R. D., Estriyanto, Y., & Suharno, S. (2022). Google sites-based learning content in hybrid learning settings: Impact on students’ self-directed learning. Journal of Counseling Indonesia.

Putri, S. A., Sujana, A., & Ali, M. (2024). The influence of Google Sites on IPAS learning on self-regulated through student learning motivation. Journal of Primary Education Research.

Quick, D., & Choo, K. K. R. (2014). Google Drive: Forensic analysis of data remnants. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 40, 179–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2013.09.016

Tampubolon, J., Lie, D., & Edward, Y. R. (2025). Transformative learning and career adaptability as predictors of work performance among working students: The moderating role of self-regulated learning. Proceedings of ICEBESMA-25. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6463-960-5_4

Tucker, C. (2021). Self-regulation in blended learning environments. Catlin Tucker: Blended Learning & Technology.

Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.). In Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–39). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50031-7

Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2

Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical background, methodological developments, and future prospects. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 166–183. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831207312909

Downloads

Published

2026-10-02

How to Cite

Fauzi, A., Situmorang, R., & Chaeruman, U. A. (2026). OPTIMIZING SELF REGULATED LEARNING THROUGH A GOOGLE SITES BASED ASYNCHRONOUS LEARNING MODEL FOR WORKING STUDENTS. Proceeding of International Seminar on Humanity, Education, and Language, 2(1), 675–690. https://doi.org/10.21009/ishel.v2i1.68777

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.