Simulasi Sistem Pencahayaan pada Gedung Center for Development of Character Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21009/JEVET.0071.02Keywords:
dialux evo, simulasi, sistem pencahayaanAbstract
Abstrak
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk membuat simulasi sistem pencahayaan pada lantai 4 Gedung CDCE. Penelitian ini secara khusus membahas apakah pencahayaan yang dihasilkan memenuhi standar yang ditetapkan dalam SNI. Metode penelitian ini adalah eksperimental dengan pendekatan deskriptif. Pengumpulan data melalui simulasi aplikasi Dialux Evo 13.1. Hasil simulasi menunjukkan bahwa lampu downlight 20,5 watt belum mampu memenuhi standar SNI 6197:2020, yang mengharuskan pencahayaan mencapai 200 lux. Pada waktu shubuh, maghrib, dan isya, rata-rata pencahayaan yang tercatat hanya 178,44 lux. Pada waktu dzuhur dan ashar, pencahayaannya masih di bawah batas minimum, dengan angka tertinggi mencapai 198,11 lux pada waktu dzuhur dengan kondisi langit cerah. Sebaliknya, penggunaan kombinasi lampu spotlight 20,5 watt dan floodlight 95 watt menghasilkan pencahayaan yang jauh lebih optimal. Rata-rata pencahayaan mencapai 242,83 lux pada kondisi tanpa cahaya alami, dan bahkan mencapai 329,38 lux pada dzuhur cerah. Berdasarkan hasil temuan ini, disarankan untuk mengganti sistem pencahayaan dengan kombinasi spotlight dan floodlight, serta merancang ulang posisi lampu untuk memastikan distribusi cahaya yang lebih merata, sehingga dapat meningkatkan kenyamanan dan mendukung kegiatan ibadah dengan lebih baik.
Abstract
This research aims to create a lighting system simulation on the 4th floor of the CDCE Building. This research specifically discusses whether the lighting produced meets the standards set by SNI. The research method is experimental with a descriptive approach. Data collection through simulation using the Dialux Evo 13.1 application. The simulation results show that the 20.5-watt downlight lamp does not yet meet the SNI 6197:2020 standard, which requires lighting to reach 200 lux. At dawn, dusk, and evening, the average recorded illumination was only 178.44 lux. At noon and afternoon, the lighting is still below the minimum threshold, with the highest figure reaching 198.11 lux at noon under clear sky conditions. On the other hand, the use of a combination of 20.5-watt spotlight and 95-watt floodlight results in much more optimal lighting. The average illumination reached 242.83 lux under conditions without natural light, and even reached 329.38 lux during a bright noon. Based on these findings, it is recommended to replace the lighting system with a combination of spotlights and floodlights, and to redesign the lamp positions to ensure a more even distribution of light, thereby enhancing comfort and better supporting worship activities.
References
Alaqtum, T., Engineer, A., & Moeller, C. (2024). Daylighting Glare and Design for Visual Comfort. Technology|Architecture + Design, 8(1), 126–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/24751448.2024.2322924
Alkhatatbeh, B. J., Kurdi, Y., & Asadi, S. (2023). Multi-objective optimization of classrooms’ daylight performance and energy use in U.S. Climate Zones. Energy and Buildings, 297, 113468–113468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2023.113468
Altenberg Vaz, N., & Inanici, M. (2020). Syncing with the Sky: Daylight-Driven Circadian Lighting Design. Leukos, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/15502724.2020.1785310
Escobar, I., Orduna-Hospital, E., Aporta, J., & Sanchez-Cano, A. (2024). Efficient Daylighting: The Importance of Glazing Transmittance and Room Surface Reflectance. Buildings, 14(10), 3108. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14103108
Giberti, C., Arzarello, F., Beltramino, S., & Bolondi, G. (2024). Mathematical discussion in classrooms as a technologically-supported activity fostering participation and inclusion. Educational Studies in Mathematics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-024-10356-y
He, S., Li, H., Yan, Y., & Cai, H. (2023). Calibrating lighting simulation with panoramic high dynamic range imaging. Journal of Building Performance Simulation, 17(1), 74–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/19401493.2023.2242306
Karyono, K., Abdullah, B., Cotgrave, A., & Bras, A. (2020). A Novel Adaptive Lighting System Which Considers Behavioral Adaptation Aspects for Visually Impaired People. Buildings, 10(9), 168. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings10090168
Miranda, D. T., Barreto, D., & Flores-Colen, I. (2024). An Evaluation of the Luminous Performance of a School Environment Integrating Artificial Lighting and Daylight. Sustainability, 16(4), 1426. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16041426
Navarrete-de Galvez, E., Gago-Calderon, A., Garcia-Ceballos, L., Contreras-Lopez, M. A., & Andres-Diaz, J. R. (2021). Adjustment of Lighting Parameters from Photopic to Mesopic Values in Outdoor Lighting Installations Strategy and Associated Evaluation of Variation in Energy Needs. Sustainability, 13(8), 4089. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084089
Peña-García, A., & Salata, F. (2021). Indoor Lighting Customization Based on Effective Reflectance Coefficients: A Methodology to Optimize Visual Performance and Decrease Consumption in Educative Workplaces. Sustainability, 13(1), 119. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010119
Petkovic, M., Bajovic, D., Vukobratovic, D., Machaj, J., Brida, P., McCutcheon, G., Stankovic, L., & Stankovic, V. (2022). Smart Dimmable LED Lighting Systems †. Sensors, 22(21), 8523. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22218523
Sawicki, D., & Wolska, A. (2022). Glare at Outdoor Workplaces—An Underestimated Factor of Occupational Risk. Energies, 15(2), 472–472. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15020472
Susa-Páez, A., & Piderit-Moreno, M. B. (2020). Geometric Optimization of Atriums with Natural Lighting Potential for Detached High-Rise Buildings. Sustainability, 12(16), 6651. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12166651
Vitsas, N., Papaioannou, G., Gkaravelis, A., & Vasilakis, A.-A. (2020). Illumination‐Guided Furniture Layout Optimization. Computer Graphics Forum , 39(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.13930
Zhang, J., Lv, K., Zhang, X., Ma, M., & Zhang, J. (2022). Study of Human Visual Comfort Based on Sudden Vertical Illuminance Changes. Buildings, 12(8), 1127–1127. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12081127
