Pros and Cons Conducting Online Experimental Research in Psychology

Authors

  • Rahmadianty Gazadinda Universitas Negeri Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21009/JPPP.112.01

Keywords:

daring, eksperimental, kontra, pro

Abstract

-

Author Biography

Rahmadianty Gazadinda, Universitas Negeri Jakarta

Lecturer at Faculty of Educational Psychology State University of Jakarta

References

Birnbaum, M. (2004). Human research and data collection via the internet. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 803–832.
Bosnjak, M., & Tuten, T. L. (2003). Prepaid and Promised Incentives in Web Surveys. Social Science Computer Review, 21(2), 208–217. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439303251569
Chandler, J., Mueller, P., & Paolacci, G. (2014). Nonnaïveté among Amazon Mechanical Turk workers : Consequences and solutions for behavioral researchers. 112–130. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-013-0365-7
Concordia St. Paul University. (n.d.). What is experimental psychology? Concordia St. Paul University. Diambil 14 September 2022, dari https://online.csp.edu/resources/article/what-is-experimental-psychology/
Dandurand, F., Shultz, T. R., & Onishi, K. H. (2008). Comparing online and lab methods in a problem-solving experiment. Behavior Research Methods, 40(2), 428–434. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.2.428
Finley, A., & Penningroth, S. (2015). Online versus In-lab: Pros and Cons of an Online Prospective Memory Experiment. Advances in Psychology Research Volume, 113(October), 135–162.
Gravetter, F. J., & Forzano, L.-A. B. (2012). Research Method for Behavioural Science.
Huber, B., & Gajos, K. Z. (2020). Conducting online virtual environment experiments with uncompensated, unsupervised samples. PLoS ONE, 15(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227629
Ilieva, J., Baron, S., & Healey, N. M. (2002). Online surveys in marketing research : pros and cons. International Journal of Market Research, 44(3), 361–376.
Kraut, R., Olson, J., Banaji, M., Bruckman, A., Cohen, J., & Couper, M. (2004). Psychological Research Online: Report of Board of Scientific Affairs’ Advisory Group on the Conduct of Research on the Internet. American Psychologist, 59(2), 105–117. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.59.2.105
Mayrhofer, R., Kuhbandner, C., & Lindner, C. (2021). The Practice of Experimental Psychology: An Inevitably Postmodern Endeavor. Frontiers in Psychology, 11(January). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.612805
Oppenheimer, D. M., Meyvis, T., & Davidenko, N. (2009). Instructional manipulation checks: Detecting satisficing to increase statistical power. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(4), 867–872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.03.009
Reinecke, K., Arbor, A., & Gajos, K. Z. (2015). LabintheWild : Conducting Large-Scale Online Experiments With Uncompensated Samples. https://doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675246
Reips, U.-D. (2000). The web experiment: Advantages, disadvantages, and solutions. Psychology experiments on the Internet, January 2000, 89–117. https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-19760
Reips, U. (2002). Standards for Internet-Based Experimenting. Erschienen in: Experimental Psychology, 49(4), 243–256. https://doi.org/10.1026//1618-3169.49.4.243
Reips, U. D. (2012). The methodology of Internet-based experiments. Oxford Handbook of Internet Psychology, 9780199561, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199561803.013.0024
Wright, K. B. (2006). Researching Internet-based Populations: Advantages and Disadvantages of Online Survey Research, Online Questionnaire Authoring Software Packages and Web Survey Services. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(3).

Downloads

Published

2022-10-24