Analisis Psikometris The Moral Injury Scale

Authors

  • Yasmin Siti Aulia Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung, 40154, Indonesia
  • Aditya Jayadinata Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung, 40154, Indonesia
  • Ally Allena Greene Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung, 40154, Indonesia
  • Diah Zaleha Wyandini Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung, 40154, Indonesia
  • Ghinaya Ummum Mukminin Hidayat Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung, 40154, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21009/JPPP.141.10

Keywords:

Moral Injury, Validity, Reliability, Model Fit, Psychological Measurement Tools

Abstract

This study aims to develop a valid and reliable measurement tool for assessing moral injury among university students in higher education settings. Moral injury is defined as the psychological impact resulting from violations of deeply held moral values, potentially leading to guilt, shame, and existential crises. The developed instrument was tested through item analysis, validity, and reliability assessments. Results indicated that all items had item-total correlations above 0.30 and factor loadings ≥ 0.40, demonstrating psychometric validity. Reliability, measured using Cronbach’s α, achieved a score of 0.963, indicating a very high level of consistency. However, model fit analysis revealed that the instrument did not fully meet the model fit criteria (GFI = 0.811; RMSEA = 0.089). Despite this, the instrument successfully categorized respondents into five levels of moral injury, with the majority classified as moderate (40.1%). These findings highlight the need for further model refinement and the development of psychological interventions to support student well-being. This study makes a significant contribution to educational psychology literature and provides a foundation for improving measurement tools to assess moral injury more effectively.

Keywords: Moral Injury, Validity, Reliability, Model Fit, University Students, Psychological Measurement Tools.

References

Azwar, S. (2012). Reliabilitas dan Validitas. Pustaka Pelajar.

Byrne, B. M. (2016). Structural Equation Modeling with Amos: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming (3rd ed.). Routledge.

Duffy, M., & Wong, S. (2016). Mindfulness-based interventions for veterans with PTSD: A systematic review. Journal of Traumatic Stress.

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis (7th ed.). Pearson Prentice Hall.

Hoge, C. W., Castro, C. A., Messer, S. C., McGurk, D., Cotting, D. I., & Koffman, R. L. (2004). Combat duty in Iraq and Afghanistan, mental health problems, and barriers to care. New England Journal of Medicine, 351(1), 13–22.

Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39, 31–36.

Litz, B. T., Stein, N. R., Delaney, E., & Lebowitz, L. (2009). Moral injury and mental health: The role of the military. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 22(5), 453–460.

Maguen, S., Litz, B. T., & Papa, A. (2006). The impact of moral injury on the mental health of veterans. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 19(4), 553–556.

Nash, W. P., Litz, B. T., & Britt, T. W. (2013). Moral injury: An integrative model. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 14(3), 220–235.

Shay, J. (2014). Moral injury. The New York Times.

Sudaryono. (2019). Metodologi Penelitian. PT. Rajagrafindo Persada.

Wijayanto, S. H. (2008). Structural Equation Modeling dengan Lisrel 8.8: Konsep dan Tutorial. Graha Ilmu.

Downloads

Published

2025-04-30