Body Conciousness Questionnaire (BCQ) Versi Bahasa Indonesia: Pengujian Properti Psikometri Menggunakan CFA dan Rasch Model

Rahmat S. Bintang; Isabell Nicole Fischer

doi:10.21009/JPPP.142.02

Authors

Rahmat S. Bintang Fakultas Psikologi, Universitas Bosowa https://orcid.org/0009-0000-3233-5444
Isabell Nicole Fischer Fakultas Psikologi, Universitas Bosowa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21009/JPPP.142.02

Keywords:

Adaptation, Body Consciousness, CFA, Rasch model

Abstract

This study aims to test the psychometric properties of the Body Consciousness Questionnaire (BCQ) instrument which has been adapted into Indonesian. Data analysis in this study used a CFA approach to test the factor structure and Rasch model analysis to obtain better parameter estimates. The sample in this study was 304 respondents (male = 108; female = 196) with an age range of 18 - 24 years (mean age = 20.58; SD age = 1.52.). The sampling method used was non-probability sampling with purposive sampling technique. The results showed that the Body Consciousness Questionnaire (BCQ) instrument has a fit model to the data (unidimensional). In addition, this finding is supported by Rasch model analysis where the assumption of unidimensionality is met. Other findings related to local independence, item fit, reliability showed good results. The items in the adapted BCQ have been declared valid and appropriate to measure the construct of Body Consciousness.

References

Beaton, D. E., Bombardier, C., Guillemin, F., & Ferraz, M. B. (2000). Guidelines for the Process of Cross-Cultural Adaptation of Self-Report Measures: Spine, 25(24), 3186–3191. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014

Aryadoust, V., Ng, L. Y., & Sayama, H. (2021). A comprehensive review of Rasch measurement in language assesment: Recommendations and guidelines for research. Language Testing, 38(1), 6-40. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532220927487

Bond, T., & Fox, C. (2015). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences (3rd ed.). Lawrence Erblaum & Associates. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315814698

Chou, Y.-T., & Wang, W.-C. (2010). Checking dimensionality in item response models with principal component analysis on standardized residuals. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70, 717–731. doi:10.1177/0013164410379322

Christensen, K. B., Makransky, G., & Horton, M. (2017). Critical values for Yen's Q3: Identification of local dependence in the Rasch model using residual correlations. Applied Psychological Measurement, 41(3), 178-194

Fenigstein, A., Scheier, M. F., & Buss, A. H. (1975). Public and private self- consciousness: Assessment and theory. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 43(4), 522–527. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076760

Hayat, B., Putra, M. D. K., Suryadi, B. (2020). Comparing item parameter estimates and fit statistics of the Rasch model from three different traditions. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 24(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v24i1.29871

Holster, T. A., & Lake, J. (2016). Guessing and the Rasch model. Language Assessment Quarterly, 13(2), 124-141. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2016.1160096

Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. A multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55.

Linacre, J. M. (2018). Winsteps® Rasch measurement computer program user’s guide. Winsteps.com

Master, G. N. (1982). A Rasch model for partial credit scoring. Psychometrica, 47(2)

McDonagh, L. K., Morrison, T. G., & McGuire, B. E. (2008). The Naked Truth: Development of a Scale Designed to Measure Male Body Image Self- Consciousness during Physical Intimacy. The Journal of Men’s Studies, 16(3), 253–265. https://doi.org/10.3149/jms.1603.253

Miller, L. C., Murphy, R., & Buss, A. H. (1981). Consciousness of body: Private and public. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41(2), 397–406. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.41.2.397

Mishra, M. (2016). Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) as an Analytical Technique to Assess Measurement Error in Survey Research: A Review. Paradigm, 20(2), 97–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0971890716672933

Rahayu, W., Hayat, B., & Putra, M. D. K. (2023). Analisis rasch: aplikasi dan interpretasi. UNJ Press

Rasch, G. (1966). An item analysis which takes individual differences into account.

The British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 19,

49-57.

Reckase, M. D. (1979). Unifactor latent trait models applied to multifactor tests: Results and

implications. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 4, 207-230.

Tennant, A., & Conaghan, P. G. (2007). The Rasch measurement model in rheumatology: What is it and why use it? When should it be applied, and what should one look for in a Rasch paper? Arthritis Care & Research, 57 (8), 1358-1362. https://doi.org.10.1002/art.23108

Turk, D. C., Meichenbaum, D. H., & Berman, W. H. (1979). Application of biofeedback for the regulation of pain: A critical review. Psychological Bulletin, 86(6), 1322–1338.

Umar, J & Nisa, Y., F. (2020). Uji validitas dengan CFA dan pelaporannya. Jurnal Pengukuran Psikologi dan Pendidikan Indonesia, 9(2), 1-11.

Wright, B. D., & Masters, G. N. (1982). Rating scale analysis. MESA Press.

Yen, W. M. (1984). Effects of local item dependence on the fit and equating performance of the three-parameter logistic model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 8(2), 125–145. https://doi.org/10.1177/014662168400800201