Uji Psikometri Skala Cyberstalking Versi Indonesia: Confimatory Factor Analysis dan Invariansi Gender

Rerepih Julung Merekah Wanodya Sinandang; Ratri Pratiwi

doi:10.21009/JPPP.142.04

Authors

Rerepih Julung Merekah Wanodya Sinandang Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Mercubuana Yogyakarta
Ratri Pratiwi Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Mercubuana Yogyakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21009/JPPP.142.04

Keywords:

Measurement invariance, cyberstalking, Psychometric Properties

Abstract

The Cyberstalking Scale has been used in various countries to measure cyberstalking behavior that is increasingly widespread in society, but there is no research that examines the psychometric properties of the Cyberstalking Scale in Indonesia. This study aims to look at the psychometric properties of construct validity with CFA and gender measurement invariance of the Indonesian version of the Cyberstalking Scale. Participants consisted of 306 male and female respondents aged 18-22 years who actively play social media. Respondents were selected using purposive sampling technique. Evaluation of the internal structure validity of the Indonesian version of the Cyberstalking Scale includes factor structure, composite reliability, and measurement invariance between genders tested using confirmatory factor analysis, reliability, and confirmatory multigroup factor analysis. The results show that the cyberstalking scale is valid and reliable (α = 0.922) In addition, the cyberstalking scale is also invariant at the strict stage.

References

Aldriano, M. A., & Priyambodo, M. A. (2022). Cyber Crime Dalam Sudut Pandang Hukum Pidana. Jurnal Kewarganegaraan, 6(1), 2169-2175.

Amarini, I. (2018). Pencegahan dampak negatif perkembangan teknologi informasi terhadap pengguna internet. Kosmik Hukum, 18(1).

Arnett, J. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55(5), 469-480.

Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological bulletin, 88(3), 588.

Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Testis structural equation models. KA Bollen and JS Long.

Byrne, B. M. (2012). Structural equation modeling with Mplus: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Routledge.

C.D. Marcum, G.E. Higgins, J. NicholsonI'm watching you: cyberstalking behaviors of university students in romantic relationshipsAm. J. Crim. Justic., 42 (2) (2017), pp. 373 388, 10.1007/s12103-016-9358-2

Chen, F.F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(3), 464–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834

Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2018 Feb;21(2):110-116. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2016.0742. Epub 2017 Aug 10.Cyberstalking Victimization, Depression, and Academic Performance: The Role of Perceived Social Support from Parents

Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2014 Feb;17(2):61-7. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2012.0231. Epub 2013 Oct 9.Cyberstalking in a large sample of social network users: prevalence, characteristics, and impact upon victims

Dreßing, H., Bailer, J., Anders, A., Wagner, H., & Gallas, C. (2014). Cyberstalking in a large sample of social network users: Prevalence, characteristics, and impact upon victims. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 17(2), 61-67.

Fox, J., & Tokunaga, R. S. (2015). Romantic partner monitoring through mobile technology: An exploration of intrusiveness, dependence, and gender. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 18(7), 410–415. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2014.0687

Irawan, P. (2014). Internet dan fenomena bangkitnya peran aktor non negara. Jurnal Komunikasi, 6(3), 59-73.

Ketaren, Eliasta. 2016. “Cybercrime, Cyber Space, Dan Cyber Law.” Jurnal Times 5

(2): 35–42.

K.L. Paullet, D.R. Rota, T.T. SwanCyberstalking: an exploratory study of students at a mid-atlantic universityIssues Informat. Syst., 10 (2) (2009), pp. 640-649

Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford publications

Marwick, A. E., & boyd, d. (2014). It's complicated: The social lives of networked teens. Yale University Press.

Putnick, D. L., & Bornstein, M. H. (2016). Measurement invariance conventions and reporting: The state of the art and future directions for psychological research. Developmental Review, 41, 71–90.

Rosana, Anita Septiani. 2010. “Kemajuan Teknologi Informasi Dan Komunikasi Dalam Industri Media Di Indonesia.” Gema Eksos 5(2): 146–48.

Silva Santos, I. L., Pimentel, C. E., & Mariano, T. E. (2023). Cyberstalking scale: development and relations with gender, FOMO and social media engagement. Current psychology, 42(6), 4802-4810

Short, E., Guppy, A., Hart, J. A., & Barnes, J. (2015). The impact of cyberstalking.

Studies in Media and Communication, 3(2), 23-37.

Spitzberg, B. H., & Cupach, W. R. (2007). The state of the art of stalking: Taking stock of the emerging literature. Aggression and violent Behavior, 12(1), 64-86.

Spitzberg, B. H., Marshall, L., & Cupach, W. R. (2001). Obsessive relational intrusion, coping, and sexual coercion victimization. Communication Reports, 14(1), 19–30 doi.org/10.1080/08934210109367733

Sugiyono. 2012. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2007). Online communication and adolescent well-being: Testing the stimulation versus the displacement hypothesis. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1169-1182

Widyopramono, Kejahatan di Bidang Komputer, (Jakarta: Pustaka Sinar Harapan, 2012), hlm. 28.

Wilson, C., Sheridan, L., & Garratt-Reed, D. (2022). What is cyberstalking? A review of measurements. Journal of interpersonal violence, 37(11-12), NP9763-NP9783.

Wright, M. F. (2018). Cyberstalking victimization, depression, and academic performance: The role of perceived social support from parents. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 21(2), 110-116.