Pengembangan Skala Kesiapan akan Perubahan pada Mahasiswa Baru di Indonesia dan Uji Invariansi: Pendekatan MIMIC Model

Rizki Nur Pratama; Muchamad Salamun Abdul Rahman; Nova Mukhlina; Muthmainnah Imtiyaz; Rifda Amira Mulika; Ricky Budhi Hartanto; Ismi Uswatun Khasanah

doi:10.21009/JPPP.142.08

Authors

Rizki Nur Pratama Fakultas Psikologi, Universitas Gajah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Muchamad Salamun Abdul Rahman Fakultas Psikologi, Universitas Gajah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2725-3732
Nova Mukhlina Fakultas Psikologi, Universitas Gajah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0009-0000-1413-9204
Muthmainnah Imtiyaz Fakultas Psikologi, Universitas Gajah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0009-0004-2002-1914
Rifda Amira Mulika Fakultas Psikologi, Universitas Gajah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0009-0008-3931-1232
Ricky Budhi Hartanto Fakultas Psikologi, Universitas Gajah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0009-0007-8337-3492
Ismi Uswatun Khasanah Fakultas Psikologi, Universitas Gajah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0009-0003-3607-4917

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21009/JPPP.142.08

Keywords:

readiness for change, first-year university students, developing scale, CFA, MIMIC Model

Abstract

This study aims to modify the existing scale of readiness for change, because until today, the measurement of readiness for change has only been carried out for organizational settings. The researcher developed three dimensions of readiness for change in freshmant and the indicators were developed from a preliminary study. Participants in this study were freshman aged 17-19 at the D1, D2, D3, D4, and S1 education levels (n = 400). The measurments of instrument was carried out in several stages, namely normality test, model test with the Confiratory Factor Analysis (CFA) and Multiple Indicators Multiple Causes (MIMIC) approaches, and reliability test. The results showed that the Readiness for Change Scale in new students in Indonesia met the model fit criteria based on the CFI, TLI, RMSEA, and SRMR values. Reliability analysis also showed that this scale was stable or reliable. This study has novelty and contribution to the study of educational and developmental psychology, because there has not been much research measuring the readiness of freshman for various changes that occur during the transition to university.

References

Arnett, J. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55(5), 469–480. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.5.469

Cameron, R. B., & Rideout, C. A. (2020). ‘It’s been a challenge finding new ways to learn’: First-year students’ perceptions of adapting to learning in a university environment. Studies in Higher Education, 47(3), 668–682. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1807492

Daniels, V. Z., Davids, E. L., & Roman, N. V. (2019). The role of family structure and parenting in first year university adjustment. South African Journal of Psychology, 49(3), 446–459. https://doi.org/10.1177/0081246319839695

Duffy, A., Keown-Stoneman, C., Goodday, S., Horrocks, J., Lowe, M., King, N., Pickett, W., McNevin, S. H., Cunningham, S., Rivera, D., Bisdounis, L., Bowie, C. R., Harkness, K., & Saunders, K. E. A. (2020). Predictors of mental health and academic outcomes in first-year university students: Identifying prevention and early-intervention targets. BJPsych Open, 6(3), e46. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2020.2

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., & Babin, B. J. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: Global edition (7th ed.). Pearson Education.

Haque, M. M. (2008). A study of the relationship between the learning organization and organizational readiness for change [Doctoral dissertation, Pepperdine University]. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.

Holt, D. T., Armenakis, A. A., Feild, H. S., & Harris, S. G. (2007). Readiness for organizational change: The systematic development of a scale. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 43(2), 232–255. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886306295295

Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118

Hurlock, E. B. (1990). Psikologi perkembangan: Suatu pendekatan sepanjang rentang kehidupan (D. Meitasari Tjandrasa, Trans.). Erlangga. (Karya asli diterbitkan 1980).

Kim, H. Y. (2013). Statistical notes for clinical researchers: Assessing normal distribution (2) using skewness and kurtosis. Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics, 38(1), 52–54. https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2013.38.1.52

McNeish, D., & Wolf, M. G. (2023). Dynamic fit index cutoffs for confirmatory factor analysis models. Psychological Methods, 28(1), 61–88. https://doi.org/10.1037/met000059

Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Santrock, J. W. (2007). Psikologi pendidikan (Edisi ke-2). Kencana.

Souza, A. C. D., Alexandre, N. M. C., & Guirardello, E. D. B. (2017). Psychometric properties in instruments evaluation of reliability and validity. Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde, 26(3), 649–659. https://doi.org/10.5123/S1679-49742017000300022

Umar, J., & Nisa, Y. F. (2020). Uji validitas konstruk dengan CFA dan pelaporannya. JP3I: Jurnal Pengukuran Psikologi dan Pendidikan Indonesia, 9(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.15408/jp3i.v9i2.17912

Wang, J., & Wang, X. (2019). Structural equation modeling: Applications using Mplus. John Wiley & Sons.

Widhiarso, W. (2012). Penerapan model MIMIC untuk menguji konsistensi hasil pengukuran melalui skala. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 6(2), 109–118. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v6i2.166.