Pengembangan Lembar Kerja Peserta Didik Berbasis Learning Cycle 5E Pada Materi Laju Reaksi Di Kelas XI.4 MAN 1 Kendari
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21009/JRPK.151.08Keywords:
learning cycle 5E, reaction rate, student worksheetAbstract
Abstrak
Penelitian "Pengembangan Lembar Kerja Peserta Didik Berbasis Learning Cycle 5E pada Materi Laju Reaksi di Kelas XI.4 MAN 1 Kendari" bertujuan untuk menguji validitas LKPD berbasis learning cycle 5E dan menentukan respons siswa terhadap media pembelajaran LKPD berbasis learning cycle 5E.Metode penelitian ini menggunakan model Thiagarajan 4-D, dengan instrumen penelitian berupa lembar validasi ahli dan lembar kuesioner respons siswa.Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa produk LKPD berbasis siklus pembelajaran 5e yang telah dikembangkan berada dalam kategori sangat layak dengan persentase rata-rata 92,8%; dengan kategori layak; dan respons siswa terhadap kepraktisan LKPD berada dalam kategori sangat layak dengan persentase 83,4%.
Abstract
This research aims to determine the level of validity of e-module development assisted by the Canva application and to determine user responses regarding e-module development in Class XI SMAN 2 Siak Hulu. This research uses the R & D development model, namely 4-D which consists of the stages of definition, design, development and implementation. The data analysis used is validation of the E-module with 3 validators and a response questionnaire. The data analysis technique in this research uses a Likert scale. The research results concluded that media experts and learning material experts had an average validity percentage of 83.93% and 81.57% with very valid criteria. It was declared very practical according to the teacher's assessment with an average percentage of 92.45%, as well as students in small group trials and field trials with an average percentage of 92.63% and 92.98% with very practical criteria. The Canva-assisted e-module on stoichiometry material that has been developed is declared suitable for use in learning according to the assessment.
References
Baade, L., Kartsonaki, E., Khosravi, H., & Lawrie, G. A. (2024). “Seeing” chemistry: investigating the contribution of mental imagery strength on students’ thinking in relation to visuospatial problem solving in chemistry.. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 26(1). https://doi.org/10.1039/d4rp00234b
Chan, M., Leng, Y., & Subramaniam, R. (2024). Depiction of scientific principles, laws and theories in Chemistry textbooks used by students in Singapore. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 25(3), 687–702. https://doi.org/10.1039/d3rp00325f
Danckwardt-Lillieström, K., Andrée, M., & Enghag, M. (2020). The drama of chemistry – supporting student explorations of electronegativity and chemical bonding through creative drama in upper secondary school. International Journal of Science Education, 42(11), 1862–1894. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1792578
Grau, F. G. I., Valls, C., Piqué, N., & Ruiz-Martín, H. (2021). The Long-Term Effects of Introducing the 5E Model of Instruction on Students’ Conceptual Learning. International Journal of Science Education, 43(9), 1441–1458. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.1918354
Karch, J. M., & Sevian, H. (2021). Development of a framework to capture abstraction in physical chemistry problem solving. Chemistry Education Research and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1039/d1rp00119a
Kloser, M., Borko, H., Wilsey, M., & Rafanelli, S. (2022). Leveraging portfolios in professional development for middle school science teachers’ assessment and data‐use practice. Science Education, 106(4), 924–955. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21712
Larison, K. D. (2021). On Beyond Constructivism. Science & Education, 31(1), 213–239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00237-8
Li, Y., Lan, Y., & Zheng, H.-Z. (2023). Impacts of the flipped classroom on student performance and problem solving skills in secondary school chemistry courses. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 24(3), 1025–1034. https://doi.org/10.1039/d2rp00339b
Mesci, G., Çavuş-Güngören, S., & Yesildag-Hasancebi, F. (2019). Investigating the development of pre-service science teachers’ NOSI views and related teaching practices. International Journal of Science Education, 42(1), 50–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1700316
Pölloth, B., Diekemper, D., & Schwarzer, S. (2023). What resources do high school students activate to link energetic and structural changes in chemical reactions? – A qualitative study. Chemistry Education. Research and Practice, 24(4), 1153–1173. https://doi.org/10.1039/d3rp00068k
Sarıtaş, D., Özcan, H., & Adúriz–Bravo, A. (2021). Observation and Inference in Chemistry Teaching: a Model-Based Approach to the Integration of the Macro and Submicro Levels. Science & Education, 30(5), 1289–1314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00216-z
Schwedler, S., & Kaldewey, M. (2020). Linking the submicroscopic and symbolic level in physical chemistry: how voluntary simulation-based learning activities foster first-year university students’ conceptual understanding. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 21(4), 1132–1147. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9rp00211a
Vo, K., Sarkar, M., White, P. J., & Yuriev, E. (2022). Problem solving in chemistry supported by metacognitive scaffolding: teaching associates’ perspectives and practices. Chemistry Education Research and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1039/d1rp00242b
Waterman, R. (2025). Transitioning to Green Discovery‐Based Catalysis. Chemistry - a European Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.202404602
Watson, Z., Farah, F., Bunnell, S., & Kristensen, T. (2023). Learning by Doing: A Multi-Level Analysis of the Impact of Citizen Science Education. Science Education, 107(5), 1324–1351. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21810
