- Analisis Stroke 200 Meter Gaya Ganti Atlet Renang Pelajar Jakarta
-
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21009/JSCE.07105Keywords:
Renang, Gaya Ganti, Analisis StrokeAbstract
ABSTRAK
Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mendeskripsikan Analisis stroke pada 200 meter gaya ganti atlet renang pelajar dki Jakarta. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah deskriptif dengan pendekatan kuantitatif untuk menjelaskan analisis stroke Gaya kupu-kupu, gaya punggung, gaya dada dan gaya bebas pada atlet prenang pelajar dki Jakarta. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah atlet pelajar dki jakarta yang berjumlah 16 orang. Sampel yang diambil adalah total sampling. Hasil analis pada 50 meter gaya kupu-kupu diperoleh Stroke length dengan nilai minimal 2 , nilai maksimal 2,22 dan nilai rata-rata = 1,39. stroke rate dengan nilai minimal 27, nilai maksimal 54 dan nilai rata-rata 34,4. stroke count dengan nilai minimal = 20, nilai maksimal 30 dan nilai rata-rata 24,25. velocity dengan nilai minimal =31,18, nilai maksimal 39, dan nilai rata-rata 26,64. pada 50 meter gaya punggung diperoleh Stroke length dengan nilai minimal 1,51 , nilai maksimal 2,23 dan nilai rata-rata = 21,12. stroke rate dengan nilai minimal 21, nilai maksimal 32,9 dan nilai rata-rata 34,4. stroke count dengan nilai minimal = 20, nilai maksimal 30 dan nilai rata-rata 42,5. velocity dengan nilai minimal =40, nilai maksimal 48,36 dan nilai rata-rata 30,63.pada 50 meter gaya dada diperoleh Stroke length dengan nilai minimal 2, nilai maksimal 2,27 dan nilai rata-rata = 16,11. stroke rate dengan nilai minimal 29, nilai maksimal 38,9 dan nilai rata-rata 29,3. stroke count dengan nilai minimal = 22, nilai maksimal 58 dan nilai rata-rata 36,38. velocity dengan nilai minimal =40, nilai maksimal 58,26 dan nilai rata-rata 36,38.pada 50 meter gaya beba diperoleh Stroke length dengan nilai minimal 2 , nilai maksimal 2,63 dan nilai rata-rata = 19,85. stroke rate dengan nilai minimal 38, nilai maksimal 41,2, dan nilai rata-rata 28,8. stroke count dengan nilai minimal = 19, nilai maksimal 25,5 dan nilai rata-rata 49,18. velocity dengan nilai minimal =35, nilai maksimal 42,02 dan nilai rata-rata 23,77.
Kata kunci: Renang, gaya ganti, analisis stroke
ABSTRACT
The purpose of this study was to describe the analysis of stroke in the 200-meter medley swimming athletes from DKI Jakarta students. The research method used is descriptive with a quantitative approach to explain stroke analysis Butterfly, backstroke, breaststroke, and freestyle in swimmer athletes from DKI Jakarta students. The population in this study were student-athletes from PPOP DKI Jakarta, which amounted to 16 people. The sample taken is total sampling. The results of the analysis on the 50-meter butterfly obtained a stroke length with a minimum value = 2 , a maximum value = 2.22, and an average value = 1.39. stroke rate with a minimum score = 27, a maximum value = 54, and an average value = 34.4. stroke count with a minimum value = 20, a maximum value = 30, and an average value = 24.25. the velocity with a minimum value = 31.18, a maximum value = 39, and an average value = 26.64. At 50 meters backstroke, the stroke length is obtained with a minimum value = 1.51, a maximum value = 2.23, and an average value = 21.12. stroke rate with a minimum score = 21, a maximum value = 32.9, and an average value = 34.4. stroke count with a minimum value = 20, a maximum value = 30, and an average value = 42.5. the velocity with a minimum value of = 40, a maximum value = 48.36, and an average value = 30.63. At 50 meters breaststroke obtained Stroke length with a minimum value = 2, a maximum value = 2.27, and an average value = 16.11. stroke rate with a minimum value = 29, a maximum value = 38.9, and an average value = 29.3. stroke count with a minimum value = 22, a maximum value = 58, and an average value = 36.38. the velocity with a minimum value of = 40, a maximum value = 58.26, and an average value of 36.38. At 50 meters of gravity, the stroke length is obtained with a minimum value of 2, a maximum value of 2.63, and an average value of 19.85. stroke rate with a minimum score of 38, a maximum value of 41.2, and an average value of 28.8. stroke count with a minimum value = 19, a maximum value of 25.5, and an average value of 49.18. the velocity with a minimum value of = 35, a maximum value of 42.02, and an average value of 23.77.
Keywords: Swimming, individual medley, stroke analysis
References
Crisafulli, A., Melis, F., Tocco, F., Laconi, P., Lai, C., & Concu, A. (2002). External Mechanical Work Versus Oxidative Energy Consumption Ratio During a Basketball Fieldtest. Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness, 42(4), 409-417.
Crisafulli, A., Melis, F., Tocco, F., Lai, C., & Concu, A. (2002). External Mechanic Work Versus Oxidative Energy Consumption Ratio During A Basketball Fieldtest. Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness, , 42 (4), 409-417.
Eview, C., Ord, P., & Arrett, A. (2014). The Athletic Profile Of Fast Bowling In Cricket: AREVIEW. Journal Of Strength and Conditioning Research, 28(5).
Hannon, P. (2010). Cricket In The Royal Marines Cricket. The Royal Marines.
Justham, L., West, A., & Cork, A. (2008). Quantification and Characterization of Cricket Bowling Technique for The Development Of The Para meters Required For A Novel Training System For Cricket. Proceedings of Instution of Mechanical Engineers, Part P: JOurnal Of Sports Engineering and Technology, 222(2), 61-76.
Kämpfe, A., Höner, O., & Willimczik, K. (2014). Multiplicity And Development Of Achievement Motivation; A Comparative Study Between German ELite Athletes With And WIthout A Disability. European Journal Of Adapted Physical Activity, 7(1), 32-48.
Lucero, B. (2022). The 100 Best Swimming Drills. Maidenhead: Meyer & Meyer Sport.
Pichler, R. (2014). Step to Success. Pharmateucial Manufacturing and Packing Sourcer (Issue WINTER).
Sudarsono, S. (2020). Pebandingan Pengaruh Antara Latihan Bowling Jarak Sesungguhnya dengan Latihan Bowling Jarak Dekat ke Jarak Sesungguhnya Terhadap Ketepatan dan Kecepatan Bowling Cricket Pada Siswa Putra Ekstakulikuler Cricket. JORPRES (Jurnal Olahraga Prestasi), 16(1), 2020, 35-44.
