Excellent Accreditation Design in High School
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to analyze the strategy for achieving superior accreditation of higher education institutions (excluding study programs). The research design used is a descriptive-quantitative study. The research was conducted at Bina Bangsa University during the institutional accreditation field assessment (AL) on August 13-14, 2021. Data analysis used nine criteria for university accreditation assessment assessed by BAN-PT. The results of the study found that the design of superior accreditation in higher education can be done by: 1) compiling a Self Evaluation Report (LED) that is congruent with the Higher Education Performance Report (LKPT) without any discrepancies with each other, 2) universities need to form institutions and carry out quality assurance seriously, 3) maximize the value of each item of accreditation fromCriteria A, B, C1--C9, and criteria D; 4) trying as much as possible to fulfill all the physical evidence needed to meet each of the existing criteria, 5) trying to provide answers to assessors during interview sessions both to the Foundation, Chancellor, middle leaders, lecturers, students, employees, alumni, cooperation partners and users .The novelty of the research is shown from the superior accreditation design related to the difficulty in meeting the accreditation criteria for colleges and study programs. This study suggests that every university should continue to make improvements in order to obtain superior accreditation by implementing good design.
References
Adisaputera, A., Pramuniati, I., & Arif, S. (2018). Analysis of the Difficulty of Study Programs in Unimed in the Development of Quality Assurance Based on Accreditation. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal), I(3), 413–421.
Alkhateeb, H., & Romanowski, MH (2021). Identifying administrators' and faculty's perspectives regarding CAEP accreditation in a College of Education: AQ methodology research. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 70(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101004
Berry, A., & Hammer, E. (2018). The relationship of accreditation and student engagement in a college of business: An internal, multi-year comparison of high impact practices. International Journal of Management Education, 16(1), 43–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2017.12.005
Burton, KV (2021). Accreditation Pressures, Culture, and the Lived Experiences of Community College Administrators: A Case Study. Morgan State University. Retrieved from https://www.proquest.com/openview/f20367d64557cd2c574540b890326071/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y
Collado, SP, & Garaycochea, RT (2020). An accreditation model that ensures the quality improvement of a college level study program. Publicaciones de La Facultad de Educacion y Humanidades Del Campus de Melilla, 50(4), 141–156. https://doi.org/10.30827/PUBLICACIONES.V50I4.17787
Daniel, S. (1967). The joint committee on Standards For Educational Evaluation. Columbus, OH 43210, United States: Ohio State University.
David, P., & Bueno, C. (2019). Accreditation Status : A Marketing Strategy Grounded on Graduate Students' Superior Interests. Institutional Multidisciplinary Research and Development Journal, 2(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.14647.98728
Eaton, JS (2001). Regional Accreditation Reform: Who is Served? Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 33(2), 38–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091380109601786
Fakhrou, A. (2020). The Problems Facing Students of College of Education at Qatar University A Path To Academic Accreditation. Qatar University. Qatr University. https://doi.org/http://hdl.handle.net/10576/16679
Fathony, MM, & Ulum, I. (2018). University' Characteristics, Accreditation Status, And Intellectual Capital Disclosure : Evidence From Indonesia. International Journal of Economics and Research, 9(6), 23–26.
Finney, TL (2019). Confirmative Evaluation: New CIPP Evaluation Model. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 18(2), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.22237/jmasm/1598889893
Frank, JR, Taber, S., Van Zanten, M., Scheele, F., & Blouin, D. (2020). The role of accreditation in 21st century health professions education: Report of an International Consensus Group. BMC Medical Education, 20(Suppl 1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02121-5
Gibbs, P. (1995). Accreditation of bsw programs. Journal of Social Work Education, 31(1), 4–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.1995.10778834
Kafaji, M. (2020). The perceived benefits of accreditation on students' performance: The case of private business schools. Industry and Higher Education, 34(6), 421–428. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950422220902698
Lim, KY (2020). A proposal for the future of medical education accreditation in Korea. Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions, 17, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.3352/JEEHP.2020.17.32
Lippe, M., & Carter, P. (2018). Using the CIPP Model to Assess Nursing Education Program Quality and Merit. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 13(1), 9–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2017.09.008
Lopez, GJB, Balila, JS, Narbarte, MP, Narbarte, RE, Borromeo, RA, & Carpizo, RT (2011). Evaluation of Strategic Planning in HEIs Using Context, Input, Process, Product (CIPP) Model: Basis for an Enhanced Model. Strand: Business, 44(8), 1689–1699.
Nielsen, NO, Eyre, P., Bellamy, JEC, & Leighton, FAT (2020). Expanding flexibility in veterinary college accreditation and veterinary licensing to help the profession meet society's needs and address challenges. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 256(10), 1098–1099. https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.256.10.1098
Patton, MQ (2013). Meta-evaluation: Evaluating the evaluation of the Paris declaration. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 27(3), 147–171.
Phillips, SD, & Kinser, K. (2018). Accreditation on the edge: Challenging quality assurance in higher education. Charles Village, Baltimore: JHU Press.
Rahardja, U., Lutfiani, N., Setiani Rafika, A., & Purnama Harahap, E. (2020). Determinants of Lecturer Performance to Enhance Accreditation in Higher Education. In International Conference on Cyber and IT Service Management, CITSM 2020 (pp. 1–7). https://doi.org/10.1109/CITSM50537.2020.9268871
Rahardja, U., Moeins, A., & Lutfiani, N. (2017). Leadership, competency, working motivation and performance of high private education lecturer with institution accreditation B: Kopertis IV area Banten province. Man in India, 97(24), 179–192.
Ranjbar, S., & Rahimy, R. (2021). A Quality Assessment of the Teaching Procedures , Faculty Performance and Curriculum of the Interpretation Courses at Bachelor's Level : A CIPP Approach 1, 19(73), 18–32.
Ravikumar, Samanta, S., Rath, AK, & Srinivasaragavan, S. (2021). Quality Assessment of Indian Universities: An Analytical Study of NAAC Accreditation Scores. Psychology and Education Journal, 58(2), 5903–5914. https://doi.org/10.17762/pae.v58i2.3063
Secretariat of Directorate General of Higher Education, Ministry of Education and Culture. (2020). Digest of Higher Education Statistics 2020. Jakarta: Kemendikbud.
Siswadi, Y., Houghty, GS, & Agustina, T. (2020). Implementation of the CIPP evaluation model in Indonesian nursing schools. Journal of Ners, 14(3), 126. https://doi.org/10.20473/jn.v14i3.17046
Stufflebeam, DL, Madaus, GF, & Kellaghan, T. (2000). Evaluation models: Viewpoints on educational and human services evaluation. Boston: Springer International Publishing AG.
Whitaker, SK, & Croft, VF (2020). Effects of accreditation on United States and Canadian veterinary college libraries in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 108(2), 167–176. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2020.882
Wilby, KJ, Zolezzi, M., Rachid, O., & El-Kadi, A. (2017). Development of a college-level assessment framework in line with international accreditation standards: A Middle Eastern perspective. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 9(1), 115–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2016.08.028
Yun, M.-D., & Seo, YW (2019). An Empirical Study on the Relationship among the Objectives of the Certification System, the Preparation and Results of Certification, and the Performance of Perceived Certifications in the Institutional Accreditation System of College. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 19(5), 524–540.
Copyright (c) 2021 JTP - Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan is an Open Access Journal. The authors who publish the manuscript in Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan agree to the following terms.
Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0)
-
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
-
ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
- You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
- No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
