Constructivistic-Based of Local Content Learning Model Design at SD Kristen Makale 1, Tana Toraja Regency

Authors

  • Dina Gasong Indonesian Christian University of Toraja
  • Selvi Tandiseru Universitas Kristen Indonesia Toraja

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21009/jtp.v24i1.26634

Keywords:

Local content Toraja Culture, Learners, Online Learning, Constructivism

Abstract

Local content learning in primary schools is very important.

However, conditions during the COVID-19 pandemic require learning to be carried out from home.

The purpose of this study is to design a local content learning model for Toraja Tallulolona culture in elementary schools based on constructivist networks. This research applies a qualitative descriptive method. Data obtained by means of (1) carry out learning in class V SD Kr Makale 1, (2) observing the implementation of local content learning Toraja Tallulolona Culture in the network, (3) do FGD. Data analysis was carried out qualitatively (1) identify learning components, (2) discussion of learning components, (3) drafting a learning model, (4) describes a learning model in the Constructivistic-based Toraja Tallulolona cultural local content network. The learning model designed, increases the learning motivation of Class V SD Kr. Makale V.

References

Aeni, A. N. (2015). Menjadi guru SD yang memiliki kompetensi personal-religius melalui program one day one juz (ODOJ). Mimbar Sekolah Dasar, 2(2), 212-223.

Alawiyah, F. (2013). Peran guru dalam kurikulum 2013. Jurnal Aspirasi, 4(1), 65-74.

Allen, J., & Shockley, B. B. (1998). Potential engagements: Dialogue among school and university research communities. In B. S. Bisplinghoff & J. Allen (Eds.), Engaging teachers: Creating teaching/researching relationships (pp. 61-71). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

Ardiansyah, J. (2013). Peningkatan kompetensi guru bidang pendidikan di Kabupaten Tana Tidung. EJournal Pemerintahan Integratif, 1(1), 38-50.

Borko, H., & Whitcomb, J. A. (2008). Teachers, teaching, and teacher education: Comments on the national mathematics advisory panel’s report. Educational Researcher, 37(9), 565–572. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08328877

Bullough, R. V., & Pinnegar, S. (2001). Guidelines for quality in autobiographical forms of self-study research. Educational Researcher, 30(3), 13–21. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X030003013

Burgener, L. & Barth, M. (2018). Sustainability competencies in teacher education: Making teacher education count in everyday school practice. Journal of Cleaner Production, 174, 821-826. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.263

Chatib, M. (2014). Gurunya Manusia. Bandung: Mizan Pustaka.

Cheruvu, R. (2014). Focus on teacher as researcher: Teacher educators as teacher researchers: Practicing what we teach. Childhood Education, 90(3), 225–228. http://doi.org/10.1080/00094056.2014.911636

Clayton (Missouri) Research Review Team: Beck, C., Dupont, L, Geismar-Ryan, L, Henke, L, Pierce, K. M., & Von

Leonard. (2018). Task and forced instructional strategy: Instructional strategy based on character and culture of Indonesia nation. Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA, 8(1), 51–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.30998/formatif.v8il.2408

Downloads

Published

2022-04-30

How to Cite

Dina Gasong, & Tandiseru, S. (2022). Constructivistic-Based of Local Content Learning Model Design at SD Kristen Makale 1, Tana Toraja Regency. JTP - Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 24(1), 120–136. https://doi.org/10.21009/jtp.v24i1.26634