Portraying Teacher Performance Management in Schools Implementing Semester Credit System
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21009/jtp.v26i1.43804Keywords:
management, performance, semester credit systemAbstract
The purpose of this study is to reveal the management of teacher performance management in schools that implement the Semester Credit System (SKS). This study uses a qualitative approach with a multi-site study design, using in-depth interviews, observation, and study of documents in collecting data. Data analysis was carried out in stages. The results showed that teacher performance planning in schools that manage the SKS program includes planning for the needs of the SKS program (needs for materials, facilities, infrastructure, and program facilities as well as the program implementing team), learning planning in the SKS program, planning for placement in the SKS class, planning for mentoring and academic guidance, training planning, capacity building, and budget planning for the SKS program. Second, the implementation of teacher performance is carried out by (a) preparing the needs of the SKS program by forming a team for developing the SKS program curriculum and making SKS program guidelines. The team is chaired by the principal, the waka of the curriculum as program coordinator, and teachers as team members. The team is tasked with preparing program guides, providing academic advisors, creating curriculum structures, determining learning loads, and recommending the number of credits to students. (b) academic tests, psychology, grades V and VI report cards, UN scores for consideration. Placing students in the SKS class in the first semester and determining the SKS program students in the second semester. Provide KRS. (c) Provide academic services in the form of academic guidance, teachers become academic advisors, provide study plan cards (KRS), help students determine credits, make learning tools, analyze student development, and socialize the development of student learning outcomes. (d) making lesson plans, making other teaching tools through the MGMP forum, preparing teaching materials, teaching processes, and teaching assessments. Third, teacher performance evaluation is carried out by the principal on an ongoing basis. Evaluation is carried out through meetings (meetings), briefings, and supervision. Supervision using a format that already exists and is available at school.
References
Abadi, B. (2018). The determinants of cucumber farmers’ pesticide use behavior in central Iran: Implications for the pesticide use management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 205, 1069–1081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.147
Abdollahzadeh, G., Damalas, C. A., & Sharifzadeh, M. S. (2017). Understanding adoption, non-adoption, and discontinuance of biological control in rice fields of northern Iran. Crop Protection, 93, 60–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2016.11.014
Adnan, N., Nordin, S. M., & Rasli, A. M. (2019). A possible resolution of Malaysian sunset industry by green fertilizer technology: factors affecting the adoption among paddy farmers. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(26), 27198–27224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05650-9
Aggarwal, A. K., Syed, A. A., & Garg, S. (2019). Factors driving Indian consumer’s purchase intention of roof top solar. International Journal of Energy Sector Management, 13(3), 539–555. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJESM-07-2018-0012
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
Akyüz, N. C., & Theuvsen, L. (2020). The impact of behavioral drivers on adoption of sustainable agricultural practices: The case of organic farming in Turkey. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(17), 6875. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU12176875
Alexopoulos, G., Koutsouris, A., & Tzouramani, I. (2010). Should I stay or should I go? Factors affecting farmers’ decision to convert to organic farming as well as to abandon it. 9th European IFSA Symposium, 4‐7 July 2010, Vienna (Austria), July, 1083–1093.
Amini, M., Rahmani, A., Abedi, M., Hosseini, M., Amini, M., Amini, M., & Gostar, M. (2021). Mahamgostar.com as a Case Study for Adoption of Lavarel Framework as the Best Programming Tools for PHP Based Web Development for Small and Medium Enterprises. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, May, 100–110.
Astuti, P., Ismono, R. H., & Situmorang, S. (2013). Faktor-faktor penyebab rendahnya minat petani untuk menerapkan budidaya cabai merah ramah lingkungan di kabupaten lampung selatan. Ilmu-Ilmu Agribisnis, 1(1), 87–92.
Ataei, P., Gholamrezai, S., Movahedi, R., & Aliabadi, V. (2021). An analysis of farmers’ intention to use green pesticides: The application of the extended theory of planned behavior and health belief model. Journal of Rural Studies, 81, 374–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.11.003
Beza, E., Reidsma, P., Poortvliet, P. M., Belay, M. M., Bijen, B. S., & Kooistra, L. (2018). Exploring farmers’ intentions to adopt mobile Short Message Service (SMS) for citizen science in agriculture. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 151(June), 295–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2018.06.015
Buettner, R. (2017). Getting a job via career-oriented social networking markets: The weakness of too many ties. Electronic Markets, 27(4), 371–385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-017-0248-3
Caffaro, F., Micheletti Cremasco, M., Roccato, M., & Cavallo, E. (2020). Drivers of farmers’ intention to adopt technological innovations in Italy: The role of information sources, perceived usefulness, and perceived ease of use. Journal of Rural Studies, 76(April), 264–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.04.028
Davis, F. D. (1986). A Technology Acceptance Model for Empirically Testing New End-User Information Systems: Theory and Results [Massachusetts Institute of Technology]. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.146.3652.1648
Dwivedi, Y. K., Rana, N. P., Chen, H., & Williams, M. D. (2011). A meta-analysis of the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT). In B. N. Nüttgens M., Gadatsch A., Kautz K., Schirmer I. (Ed.), Governance and Sustainability in Information Systems. Managing the Transfer and Diffusion of IT (Vol. 366, pp. 155–170). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24148-2_10
Escobar-Rodríguez, T., & Carvajal-Trujillo, E. (2013). Online drivers of consumer purchase of website airline tickets. Journal of Air Transport Management, 32, 58–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2013.06.018
Faridi, A. A., Kavoosi-Kalashami, M., & Bilali, H. El. (2020). Attitude components affecting adoption of soil and water conservation measures by paddy farmers in Rasht County, Northern Iran. Land Use Policy, 99(June), 104885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104885
Fathia, Q. N., Nurmalina, R., & Simanjuntak, M. (2018). Consumer’s Attitude and Willingness to Pay for Organic Rice. Indonesian Journal of Business and Entrepreneurship, 4(1), 11–21. https://doi.org/10.17358/ijbe.4.1.11
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company. https://people.umass.edu/aizen/f&a1975.html
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate Data Analysis. Pearson Education Limited. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118895238.ch8
Hayat, N., Al Mamun, A., Nasir, N. A. M., Selvachandran, G., Nawi, N. B. C., & Gai, Q. S. (2020). Predicting sustainable farm performance-Using hybrid structural equation modelling with an artificial neural network approach. Land, 9(9), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.3390/LAND9090289
Izdihar, H. (2012). Motivasi dan Persepsi Petani Kentang Dataran Tinggi Dieng terhadap Pestisida Organik serta Analisisnya berdasarkan Theory of Planned Behavior. IPB University.
Jeong, N., Yoo, Y., & Heo, T.-Y. (2009). Moderating effect of personal innovativeness on mobile-RFID services: Based on Warshaw’s purchase intention model. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76(1), 154–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2008.08.007
Kang, H. S., & Moneyham, L. (2010). Attitudes toward and intention to receive the human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccination and intention to use condoms among female Korean college students. Vaccine, 28(3), 811–816. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.10.052
Khan, R. A., & Qudrat-ullah, H. (2021). Adoption of LMS in Higher Educational Institutions of the Middle East. Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021.
Khechine, H., Lakhal, S., & Ndjambou, P. (2016). A meta-analysis of the UTAUT model: Eleven years later. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 33(2), 138–152. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjas.1381
Kusumo, R. A. B., Rasmikayati, E., Mukti, G. W., Fatimah, S., & Saefudin, B. R. (2018). Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Keputusan Petani Mangga Dalam Menggunakan Teknologi Off Season di Kabupaten Cirebon. MIMBAR AGRIBISNIS: Jurnal Pemikiran Masyarakat Ilmiah Berwawasan Agribisnis, 4(1), 57–69.
Labaran, M. (2015). Assessing the Factors Influencing the Adoption of Bio-Pesticides in Vegetable Production in the Ashanti Region of Ghana [Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology]. https://doi.org/10.1145/3132847.3132886
Li, W., Clark, B., Taylor, J. A., Kendall, H., Jones, G., Li, Z., Jin, S., Zhao, C., Yang, G., Shuai, C., Cheng, X., Chen, J., Yang, H., & Frewer, L. J. (2020). A hybrid modelling approach to understanding adoption of precision agriculture technologies in Chinese cropping systems. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 172, 105305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2020.105305
Lin, T.-C., Wu, S., Wang, K., & Tsai, M.-C. (2015). Factors Affecting Third-Generation Mobile Services: Applying the Purchase Intention Model. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 25(1), 47–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/10919392.2015.990778
Macharia, I., Mithöfer, D., & Waibel, H. (2013). Pesticide handling practices by vegetable farmer in Kenya. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 15, 887–902. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-012-9417-x
Markets and Markets. (2020). Biopesticides Market. https://www.marketsandmarkets.com/Market-Reports/biopesticides-267.html
Martín, H. S., & Herrero, Á. (2012). Influence of the user’s psychological factors on the online purchase intention in rural tourism: Integrating innovativeness to the UTAUT framework. Tourism Management, 33(2), 341–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2011.04.003
Migwi, B. G. (2016). Assessment of Farmers’ Perceptions of and Willingness to Pay for Aflasafe KE01, a Biological Control for Aflatoxins in Kenya. University of Nairobi.
Mordor Intelligence. (2023). Indonesia Biopesticides Market Size & Share Analysis - Growth Trends & Forecasts (2023 - 2028). https://www.mordorintelligence.com/industry-reports/indonesia-biopesticides-market
Mukred, A., Singh, D., & Mohd Satar, N. S. (2020). Examining The Influence of Perceived Need on The Adoption of Information System in Public Hospitals in Yemen. Asia-Pacific Journal of Information Technology and Multimedia, 9(2), 35–49. https://doi.org/10.17576/apjitm-2020-0902-04
Neuman, W. L. (2014). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches (7th ed.). Pearson Education Limited. https://doi.org/10.2307/3211488
Parvan, A. (2011). Agricultural Technology Adoption: issues for consideration when scaling-up. Cornell Policy Review, 1(1), 1–28.
Prabayanti, H. (2010). Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhi Adopsi Biopestisida oleh Petani di Kecamatan Mojogedang. Universitas Sebelas Maret.
Prasetya, M. H., Zebua, D. D. N., & Yuliawati. (2021). Faktor Internal dan Eksternal Yang Mempengaruhi Tingkat Resistensi Petani Terhadap Usahatani Padi Organik. Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian, 17(1), 39–51.
Rasyidha, M. H., Najib, M., & Sumarwan, U. (2020). The Influence of Intention to Use Medians Potato Varieties on the Result of Technological Innovation Development with Technology Acceptance Models. Jurnal Manajemen, 24(1), 38–58. https://doi.org/10.24912/jm.v24i1.617
Renaud, K., & Van Biljon, J. (2008). Predicting technology acceptance and adoption by the elderly: A qualitative study. Proceedings of the South African Institute for Computer Scientists and Information Technologists (SAICSIT). https://doi.org/10.1145/1456659.1456684
Rezaei, R., Safa, L., Damalas, C. A., & Ganjkhanloo, M. M. (2019). Drivers of Farmers’ Intention to Use Integrated Pest Management: Integrating Theory of Planned Behavior and Norm Activation Model. Journal of Environmental Management, 236, 328–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.01.097
Rezaei, R., Safa, L., & Ganjkhanloo, M. M. (2020). Understanding farmers’ ecological conservation behavior regarding the use of integrated pest management- an application of the technology acceptance model. Global Ecology and Conservation, 22, e00941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2020.e00941
Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations (Fifth Ed.). Free Press. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=9U1K5LjUOwEC&printsec=frontcover&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false
Schukat, S., Kuhlmann, A., & Heise, H. (2019). Fattening pig farmers’ intention to participate in animal welfare programs. Animals, 9(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9121042
Septiani, H. L. D., Sumarwan, U., Yuliati, L. N., & Kirbrandoko. (2021). Minat Petani Mengadopsi Sharing Economy Peer-to-Peer Lending Sebagai Alternatif Pembiayaan Pertanian. MIX: Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, 11(1), 1–21.
Sharifzadeh, M. S., Damalas, C. A., Abdollahzadeh, G., & Ahmadi-Gorgi, H. (2017). Predicting adoption of biological control among Iranian rice farmers: An application of the extended technology acceptance model (TAM2). Crop Protection, 96, 88–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2017.01.014
Silaban, C. A. (2019). Minat Petani Kakao dalam Melakukan Fermentasi Biji Kakao di Kecamatan Binjai Kabupaten Langkat. Politeknik Pembangunan Pertanian Medan.
Sumartini. (2016). Biopestisida untuk Pengendalian Hama dan Penyakit Tanaman Aneka Kacang dan Umbi. Iptek Tanaman Pangan, 11(2), 159–166.
Tarukallo, P. B., Unde, A. A., & Ladaha. (2014). Faktor yang memengaruhi adopsi teknologi biopestisida oleh petani sayur di Sendana dan Purangi Kota Palopo. Jurnal Komunikasi KAREBA, 3(2), 125–132.
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer Acceptance and Use of Information Technology: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157–178. https://doi.org/10.1109/MWSYM.2015.7167037
Wang, S., Wang, J., Zhao, S., & Yang, S. (2019). Information publicity and resident’s waste separation behavior: An empirical study based on the norm activation model. Waste Management, 87, 33–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2019.01.038
Wang, Z., Guo, D., Wang, X., Zhang, B., & Wang, B. (2018). How does information publicity influence residents’ behaviour intentions around e-waste recycling? Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 133(January), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.01.014
Wang, Z., Zhang, B., & Li, G. (2014). Determinants of energy-saving behavioral intention among residents in Beijing: Extending the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy, 6(5), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4898363
Wilson, C., & Tisdell, C. (2001). Why Farmers Continue to Use Pesticides Despite Environmental, Health and Sustainability Costs. Ecological Economics, 8009, 449–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(01)00238-5
Wu, Y. H., Damnée, S., Kerhervé, H., Ware, C., & Rigaud, A. S. (2015). Bridging the digital divide in older adults: A study from an initiative to inform older adults about new technologies. Clinical Interventions in Aging, 10, 193–201. https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S72399
Zhang, L., Hu, Q., Zhang, S., & Zhang, W. (2020). Understanding Chinese Residents’ Waste Classification from A Perspective of Intention-Behavior Gap. Sustainability, 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12104135
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan is an Open Access Journal. The authors who publish the manuscript in Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan agree to the following terms.
Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0)
-
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
-
ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
- You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
- No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
