Cycle Model Of Integrative-Interconnective Strategy within Character Learning
Abstrak
Received: Revised: Accepted: This paper describes the cycle model of integrative-interactive character learning strategies at ‘MTs’ (Islamic Junior High School) Islamic Boarding School. The data is focused on MTs Al-Qodiri 1 and Nuris 1 Jember. This study used a qualitative approach having a multi-site research principle. The findings of this study showed that the application of the cycle model of integrative-interactive character learning strategies in MTs Islamic Boarding School has its own characteristics and can be considered to be a successful model of student character development. Character learning materials, especially the character values are the integration of values within the formal curriculum and Sufi based Islamic Boarding School typical curriculum. The materials are organized through the process of determining the material, structuring the order, constructing analogy, and summarizing the contents of character learning. Various interactive, collaborative and learning media are used, so that the transfer process of character learning material is easily understood and practiced in daily life. In order to ensure that the organization and the process of learning provision are more optimal, the character learning regulation is carried out by a 24-hour scheduling process followed by a continuous process of monitoring, motivational management, and supervision.
Referensi
Anam, S., Degeng, I.N.S., Murtadho, N., Kuswandi, D. (2019). The Moral Education and Internalization of Humanitarian Values in Pesantren. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(4), 815-834. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.629726.
Antoncic, L. S. (2003). A New Era in Humane Education: How Troubling Youth Trends and a Call for Character Education are Breathing New Life into Efforts to Educate Our Youth About the Value of All Life. Animal Law, 9, 183-214.
Arsih, F., Zubaidah, S., Suwono, H., Gofur, A. (2019). The Exploration of Educational Value in Randai Minangkabau Art, Indonesia. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(4), 1225-1248. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.605463.
Benninga, J. S., Berkowitz, M. W., Kuehn, P., & Smith, K. (2003). The Relationship of Character Education Implementation and Academic Achievement in Elementary Schools. Journal of Research in Character Education, 1(1), 19-32.
Berkowitz Wolfgang dan Marvin. (2006). Moral Education and Character Education: The Relationship and Roles in Citizenship Education. Journal of Moral Education, volume 35, Desember.
Bogdan dan Biklen. (2003). Qualitative Research For Education: An Introduction Theory and Methods. London: Allyn & Bacon, Incorporated.
Creswell, John W. (2012). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Tradition. London: SAGE Publications.
Degeng, I Nyoman S. (2013). Ilmu Pembelajaran: Klasifikasi Varibel untuk Pengembangan Teori dan Penelitian. Bandung: Aras Media.
E.Tung. 2005. Changing Political Scenario in Hong Kong and Its Impact on Education after July 1997. Paper presented on the Australian Association for Research in Education, Brisbane. Retrieved on April 18 2005 dalam http://www.aare.edu.au/97pap/tunge502.htm (diakses 02 Maret 2017).
Fawait, A., Setyosari, P., Sulthoni, Ulfa, S. (2020). Identification of Factors Affecting of Character Education Program on High School Students’ Self-Regulation Skills. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 8(1), 435-450. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.683165.
Frager, Robert. (2005). Hati, Diri dan Jiwa: Psikologi sufi untuk Transformasi. Terj. Hasmiyah Rouf. Jakarta: Searambi.
Gani, A. (2019). Urgency Education Morals of Sufism. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(3), 499-513. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.603574
Gerlach dan Ely. (1971). Teaching & Media: A Systematic Approach. Second Edition, by V.S. Gerlach & D.P. Ely, 1980, Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon. Copyright 1980 by Pearson Education.
Gina M. Almerico. (2014). Building Character Through Literacy With Children’s Literature. Research in Higher Education Journal, Volume 26 – October, 2014.
Hamid, Hamdani dan Beni Ahmad Saebani. (2013). Pendidikan Karakter Perspektif Islam. Bandung: Pustaka Setia.
Izzati, U.A., Bachri, B.S., Sahid, M., Indriani, D.E. (2019). Character Education: Gender differences in Moral Knowing, Moral Feeling, and Moral Action in Elementary Schools in Indonesia. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(3), 547-556. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.597765.
Kemp., Jerrold E. (1995). Instruction Desigen: A Plan for Unit and Course Development, Belmon: Feron.
Lickona, Thomas. (1993). The Return of Character Education. Journal of Educational Leadership, Vol. 3, No. 3, November.
Lickona, Thomas. (2012). Character Matters: How to Help Out Children Develop Good Judgment, Integrity, and Other Essential Virtues. Penerjemah Juma Abdu Wamaungo & Jean Antunes Rudolf Zien. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Lickona, Thomas. (2012). Educating for Character How Out Schools can Teach Respect and Responsibility. Penerjemah Juma Abdu Wamaungo. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Lincoln & Guba (1995). Naturalistic Inquiry. New Delhi: Sage Publication, inc
Majid, Abdul dan Dian Andayani. (2017). Pendidikan Karakter Perspektif Islam. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Megawangi, Ratna. (2007). Pendidikan Karakter. Jakarta Herritage Foundation.
Miles&Huberman. (1992). Analisa Data Kualitatif. Penerjemah: Rohidi, R. T. Jakarta: UI-Press.
Peter Lang. Tt. Towards an Understanding of Affective Education in a European Context, dalam http://conference.nie.edu.sg/ paper/ new% 20 converted/ab00566.pdf. (diakses 02 Maret 2017 ).
Reigeluth, C.M. (1979a). TICCIT to the Future: Advaces in Instructional Theory for CAI. Journal of Computer-Based Instructional, 6 (2), 20-46.
Reigeluth, C.M. (1983a). Instructional Design: What Is It and Why Is It?. Dalam C.M. Reigeluth (Ed). Instrutional-Design Theories and Models: An Overview of Their Current Status. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 3-36.
Reigeluth, C.M. dan Merril, M.D. (1978). A Knowledge Base for Improving Our Methods of Instruction. Educational Psycologist, 13, 57-70.
Reigeluth, C.M. dan Merril, M.D. (1979). Classes of Instructional Varibles. Educational Technology, 19 (3), 5-24.
Tortop, H. S. (2015). A Comparison of Gifted and Non-gifted Students’ Self-regulation Skills for Science Learning, Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 3 (1), 42-57. http://jegys.org, DOI: 10.17478/JEGYS.2015112017.
Umami, I., Gani, A., Waskitor, T. (2019). Proposal of Character and Moral Education for Gifted Young Scientists in Indonesia. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(2), 377-387. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.579560.
Wong Ping-ho Law Sin-yee, Angelina Yip Sin-ching. (Tt). Affective Education: The Value Development of Hong Kong Student-Teachers dalam http://conference.nie.edu.sg/paper/new%20converted/ab00566.pdf (diakses 02 Maret 2017).
Yin, Robert K. (2008). Case Study Research: Design and Methods, Penerjemah M. Djauzi Mudzakir, Studi Kasus: Desain dan Metode. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo.
##submission.copyrightStatement##
##submission.license.cc.by-sa4.footer##Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan is an Open Access Journal. The authors who publish the manuscript in Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan agree to the following terms.
Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0)
-
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
-
ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
- You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
- No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
