The Influence of Personalized Web-Based Learning on The Mastery and Application of Concepts in Students with Different Learning Styles

Authors

  • Abdul Haris Indrakusuma Universitas Negeri Malang
  • Punaji Setyosari Universitas Negeri Malang
  • Sulton Universitas Negeri Malang
  • Waras Universitas Negeri Malang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21009/jtp.v26i1.45877

Keywords:

Personalization, Web-Based Learning, Mastery of Concepts, Application of Concepts, Learning Style

Abstract

Conventional learning has limitations, leading researchers to propose personalized web-based learning tailored to individual student characteristics. This study focuses on enhancing web-based learning at Bhinneka PGRI University in Indonesia by customizing content and activities to align with students' learning styles. The research methodology uses a quasi-experimental design involving 72 information technology education students. Data collection includes assessments of learning styles, concept mastery, and concept application through tests. Descriptive statistical analysis shows that personalized web-based learning has a more positive influence on the mastery and application of concepts compared to non-personalized learning. There is no significant correlation between personalized web-based learning and students' learning styles. The findings indicate differences in mastery and application of concepts among students using web-based learning, but no disparities based on different learning styles. In conclusion, personalized web-based learning leads to variations in mastery and application of concepts compared to non-personalized methods, with no discernible discrepancy in the mastery and application of concepts between students with different learning styles. Research indicates that personalized web-based learning is more effective in enhancing mastery and application of concepts compared to non-personalized methods. By customizing web-based learning to individual learning styles, students can enhance the quality and outcomes of their learning.

References

Akbulut, Y., & Cardak, C. S. (2012). Adaptive educational hypermedia accommodating learning styles: Content analysis of publications from 2000 to 2011. Computers and Education, 58(2), 835–842.
Anderson, L.W., & Krathwohl, D.R. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York: Longman.
Asari, A.R. (1998). Penggunaan Alat Peraga Manipulatif dalam Pemahaman Konsep Matematika. Pengajaran MT-PA, 27(1): 1-13.
Cerra, P.P. et al. (2013). Can Interactive web based CAD tools improve the learning of engineering drawing?, a case study. Journal Science Education Technology, doi 10.1007/s10956-01309471-7.
Cheng, G. (2014). Exploring students’ learning styles in relation to their acceptance and attitudes towards using Second Life in education: Acase study in Hong Kong. Computers and Education, 70, 105–115.
Dunn, R., Dunn, K., & Price, G. E. (1984). Productivity environmental preference survey. Lawrence: Price Systems.
Felder, R.M., dan Silverman, L. K. (1988). Learning and Teaching Styles in Engineering Education. Engineering Education Journal, 78(7), 674–681.
Franzoni-Velazquez, A. L., Cervantes-Perez, F. & Assar, S. (2012). A Quantitative Analysis of Student Learning Styles and Teacher Teachings Strategies in a Mexican Higher Education Institution. Journal of Applied Research and Technology, 10(3), 289-308.
Gardner, H. (1999). The Dicipline Mind: What Students Should Understand. New York: Simon & Schuster Inc.
Hwang, G. J., Sung, H. Y., Hung, C. M., Huang, I., & Tsai, C. C. 2012. Development of a personalized educational computer game based on students’ learning styles. Educational Technology Research and Development, 60(4), 623–638.
Hwang, G. J., Panjaburee, P., Shih, B. Y., & Triampo, W. (2013a). A group decision approach to developing concept effect models for diagnosing student learning problems. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(3), 453–468.
Hwang, G. J., Sung, H. Y., Hung, C. M., & Huang, I. (2013b). A learning style perspective to investigate the necessity of developing adaptive learning systems. Educational Technology and Society, 16(2), 188–197.
Kaburlasos, V. G., Marinagi, C. C., & Tsoukalas, V. T. (2008). Personalized multi-student improvement based on Bayesian cybernetics. Computers and Education, 51, 1430–1449.
Keefe, J. W. (1987). Learning styles: Theory and practice. Reston: National Association of Secondary School Principals.
Kolb, D. A., Osland, J. S., & Rubin, I. M. (1995). Organization behaviour (6th ed.). New Jersey: Prince-Hall.
Litzinger, T.A., Lee, S.H., Wise, J.C., dan Felder, R.M. (2005). A study of the reliability and validity of the Felder-Soloman Index of Learning Styles, Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference, American Society for Engineering Education.
Litzinger, T., Lee, S. H., Wise, J. C., & Felder, R. M. (2007). A psychometric study of the index of learning styles. Journal of Engineering Education, 96(4), 309–319.
Mampadi, F., Chen, S. Y., Ghinea, G., & Chen, M.-P. (2011). Design of adaptive hypermedia learning systems: A cognitive style approach. Computers and Education, 56(4), 1003–1011.
Oliver, R. (2007). Engaging first year students using a web supported inquiry based learning setting. High Education, 55, 285-301.
Panjaburee, P., Hwang, G. J., Triampo, W., & Shih, B. Y. (2010). A multi-expert approach for developing testing and diagnostic systems based on the concept-effect model. Computers and Education, 55(2), 527–540.
Panjaburee, P. & Srisawasdi, N. (2013a). Criteria and strategies for applying concept-effect relationship model in technological personalized learning environment. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Computers in Education (2013). Asia-Pacific Society for Computers in Education, Indonesia.
Panjaburee, P. & Srisawasdi, N. (2013b). Guideline for the development of personalized technology enhanced learning in science, technology, and mathematics education. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Computers in Education 2013. Asia-Pacific Society for Computers in Education, Indonesia.
Papanikolaou, K. A., Grigoriadou, M., Magoulas, G. D., & Kornilakis, H. (2002). Towards new forms of knowledge communication: The adaptive dimension of a web-based learning environment. Computers and Education, 39, 333–360.
Papastergiou, M., & Gerodimos, V. (2012). Can learning of basketball be enhanced through a web based multimedia course?, an experimental study. Education Information Technology (2013), 18, 459-478, doi 10.1007/s10639-012-9186-z.
Permana, Pepen. (2008). E-Learning dan dosen Online, h. 84. Padang: Ilmu Computer.Com.
Popescu, E. (2010). Adaptation provisioning with respect to learning styles in a Web-based educational system: An experimental study. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(4), 243–257.
Rusman. (2011). Model-Model dosen, h. 335. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Rusman. (2012). Belajar dan dosen Berbasis Komputer, h. 295. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Rusman, Deni Kurniawan & Cepi Riyana. (2012). Dosen Berbasis Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Santoso, Singgih. (2015). Menguasai Statistik Parametrik: Konsep dan Aplikasi dengan SPSS. Jakarta: PT. Elex Media Komputindo.
Santoso, Singgih, dan Tjiptono. (2002). Riset Pemasaran : Konsep dan Aplikasinya dengan SPSS. Jakarta: PT. Elex Media Komputindo.
Setyosari, P. (2013). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan dan Pengembangan. Jakarta: Kharisma Putra Utama.
Shukr, I., Zainab, R., & Rana, M. H. (2013). Learning styles of postgraduate and undergraduate medical students. Journal of College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan, 23, 25-30.
Solusindo, E-Media. (2008). Membangun Komunitas Online Secara Praktis Dan Gratis. Jakarta: PT Gramedia.
Srisawasdi, N. (2012). Introducing students to authentic inquiry investigation by using an artificial olfactory system. In K. C. D. Tan, M. Kim, & S. W. Hwang (Eds.), Issues and challenges in science education research: Moving forward. Dordrecht: Springer.
Srisawasdi, N. & Panjaburee, P. (2015). Personal learning activity approach for developing adaptive webbased learning systems. Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computers in Education. China: Asia-Pacific Society for Computers in Education.
Tseng, S. S., Su, J. M., Hwang, G. J., Hwang, G. H., Tsai, C. C., & Tsai, C. J. (2008b). An object-oriented course framework for developing adaptive learning systems. Educational Technology and Society, 11(2), 171–191.
Tuckman, B.W. & Harper. (2012). Conducting educational research, 5th edition: Orlando: Harcourt Brace College Publisher.
Ultanir, E., Ultanir, Y. G. & Temel, G. O. (2012). The Examination of University Students' Learning Styles by Means of Felder-Silverman Index. Egitim Ve Bilim-Education and Science, 37(163), 29-42.

Downloads

Published

2024-07-19

How to Cite

Abdul Haris Indrakusuma, Setyosari, P., Sulton, & Waras. (2024). The Influence of Personalized Web-Based Learning on The Mastery and Application of Concepts in Students with Different Learning Styles . JTP - Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 26(1), 291–305. https://doi.org/10.21009/jtp.v26i1.45877