Relationship on Three Factors Self Efficacy, Self-Actualization, and Working Environment with Heutagogy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21009/jtp.v25i3.47673Keywords:
self-efficacy, self-actualization, working environment, heutagogy, facilitatorAbstract
Training for adults requires different ways and techniques in the application of special techniques that involve learning facilitators. An effective facilitator must have knowledge and competence about the content they teach, as well as skills to control the group. This leads to the need that the facilitator needs personal qualities that not only reflect the professionalism and character of the facilitator but also be able to overcome problems that occur in adult learning. This also happened at the Balai Besar Pemerintahan Desa Kementerian Dalam Negeri (BBPD) in Indonesia, which has the task and responsibility of conducting learning and training for village officials throughout Indonesia. Officials who are generally adult learners and have busy schedules need a reliable facilitator in the learning process. One of the things is to apply heutagogy as an alternative solution to maintain the facilitator's ability in adult learning. The application of heutagogy is expected to make the learning process lead to a sustainable system because they can return to their hometown with the expected application of knowledge. Based on the results of the preliminary analysis from the initial survey include the need for correct self-efficacy and the existence of a well-considered working environment also self-actualization in order to work more optimally in the learning process of adult learning using heutagogy. However, this needs to be proven empirically by quantitative research in more depth in the scope of BBPD so that the research result can state the validity of these three variable factors to the adult learning process carried out by BBPD. This research is explanatory research, which is research that seeks to explain the causal relationship that occurs between research variables and test hypotheses that have been formulated with quantitative research methods. The result shows that self-efficacy has the most significant factor among other aspects.
References
A. Bandura, W. H. Freeman, and R. Lightsey, “Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control,” Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, vol. 13, no. 2. pp. 158–166, 1999, doi: 10.1891/0889-8391.13.2.158.
A. Dailey-Hebert and K. S. Dennis, Transformative Perspectives and Processes in Higher Education. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2015.
A. Flammer, “Self-efficacy,” in International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, no. December 2001, Elsevier, 2001, pp. 13812–13815.
A. Glassner and S. Back, “HEUTAGOGY ( SELF-DETERMINED LEARNING ): NEW APPROACH,” vol. XXIV, pp. 39–44, 2019.
A. I. Nikolovska, A. Grizev, and A. Iliev, “History of Heutagogy as a self-determinated learning. Proceedings of Papers, 147,” 2nd Int. Sci. Conf. MILCON’19, no. April, pp. 146–152, 2019.
A. Kamaruddin and R. Mohd Rasdi, “Work Value Orientation and TVET Students’ Career Decision-Making Self-Efficacy: The Mediating Role of Academic Major Satisfaction,” Pertanika J. Soc. Sci. Humanit., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 799–817, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.47836/pjssh.29.2.04.
A. Rasyad, B. B. Wiyono, and R. A. Rahma, “An analysis of workshop program implementation and competency improvement for adult education facilitators in Indonesia,” Int. J. Innov. Creat. Chang., vol. 10, no. 10, pp. 609–623, 2020.
A. W. Dodd, “From Survival to Self-Actualization: Reflections on Teaching and Teacher Education,” High Sch. J., vol. 84, no. 3, pp. 13–18, 2001, doi: 10.1353/hsj.2001.0002.
B. Akpan and T. J. Kennedy, Science Education: Theory and Practice. Springer, 2012.
B. Gros, Kinshuk, and M. Maina, The Future of Ubiquitous Learning, no. November. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2016.
C. Maykut RN, BScN, MN, DNP, C. Wild RN, BScN, MSN, and N. May RN, BScN, “Heutagogy: Enacting Caring Science Practices,” Int. J. Caring Sci., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 11–17, 2019, [Online]. Available: http://ezproxy.puc.cl/scholarly-journals/heutagogy-enacting-caring-science-practices/docview/2236690699/se-2?accountid=16788%0Ahttp://todosibuc.uc.cl/openurl/56PUC_INST/56PUC_INST_SP?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&genre=artic.
E. Elstad and K.-A. Christophersen, “Teachers" Self-Efficacy at Maintaining Order and Discipline in Technology-Rich Classrooms with Relation to Strain Factors,” 2017.
F. Naeem, “Self- actualisation leads to self-satisfaction and contentment A study conducted on females professionals in the service sector of India,” vol. 40, no. 10, pp. 684–695, 2020.
G. Ordun and F. A. Akün, “Self Actualization, Self Efficacy and Emotional Intelligence of Undergraduate Students,” J. Adv. Manag. Sci., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 170–175, 2017, doi: 10.18178/joams.5.3.170-175.
I. Ivtzan, H. E. Gardner, I. Bernard, M. Sekhon, and R. Hart, “Wellbeing through self-fulfilment: Examining developmental aspects of self-actualization.,” Humanist. Psychol., vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 119–132, Apr. 2013, doi: 10.1080/08873267.2012.712076.
J. A. Kolb, S. Jin, and J. Hoon Song, “A model of small group facilitator competencies,” Perform. Improv. Q., vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 119–133, 2008, doi: 10.1002/piq.20026.
J. L. Jarrett, “Adult Education and Freedom,” Adult Educ., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 67–72, Jan. 1960, doi: 10.1177/074171366001000202.
J. P. Halsall, J. L. Powell, and M. Snowden, “Determined learning approach: Implications of heutagogy society based learning,” Cogent Soc. Sci., vol. 2, no. 1, p. 1223904, Dec. 2016, doi: 10.1080/23311886.2016.1223904.
J. P. Wilson, The Adult Learner: The Definitive Classic in Adult Education and Human Resource Development, vol. 44, no. 7. Taylor and Francis, 2012.
K.-T. Wong, M. A. Yeop, and M. binti M. Mazura, “Modelling the Factor Influencing the Implementation of Mobile-Heutagogical Practices among Teachers: An Application of Invariance Multi-Group Structural Model,” Int. J. Learn. Teach. Educ. Res., vol. 18, no. 12, pp. 1–16, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.26803/ijlter.18.12.1.
Kementerian Dalam Negeri, “Organisasi dan Tata Kerja Unit Pelaksana Teknis Balai Pemerintahan Desa Kementerian Dalam Negeri.” Kementrian Dalam Negeri, Jakarta, 2016, [Online]. Available: https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Home/Details/163292/permendagri-no-106-tahun-2016.
L. Blaschake, “Heutagogy: The pedagogy of agency,” Pacific J. Technol. Enhance. Learn., vol. 3, no. 1, p. 45, 2021, doi: 10.24135/pjtel.v3i1.110.
L. M. Blaschke, “Heutagogy and lifelong learning: A review of heutagogical practice and self-determined learning,” Int. Rev. Res. Open Distance Learn., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 56–71, 2012, doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v13i1.1076.
M. Fernando and V. Nilakant, “The place of self-actualisation in workplace spirituality: Evidence from Sri Lanka,” Cult. Relig., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 233–249, Nov. 2008, doi: 10.1080/14755610802535538.
M. Neto, “Journal of Student Engagement: Education Matters Educational motivation meets Maslow: Self- actualisation as contextual driver,” J. Student Engagem. Educ. Matters, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 18–27, 2015, [Online]. Available: http://ro.uow.edu.au/jseemhttp://ro.uow.edu.au/jseem/vol5/iss1/4.
M. Pumptow and T. Brahm, “Students’ Digital Media Self-Efficacy and Its Importance for Higher Education Institutions: Development and Validation of a Survey Instrument,” Technol. Knowl. Learn., vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 555–575, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s10758-020-09463-5.
M. Shabbir, S. Masood, and G. K. Siddiqui, “Role of Transformative Learning Interventions in Developing Conducive Environment for Female Adult Learners in Higher Education,” Rev. Econ. Dev. Stud., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 491–500, 2020, doi: 10.47067/reads.v6i2.217.
M. Tight, Key Concepts in Adult Education and Training. Routledge, 2012.
N. K. Sichula and G. Genis, “Pedagogical practices in non-formal adult literacy classes in Zambia,” Int. Rev. Educ., vol. 65, no. 6, pp. 879–903, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.1007/s11159-019-09808-y.
S. B. Merriam and Y. Kee, “Promoting Community Wellbeing: The Case for Lifelong Learning for Older Adults,” Adult Educ. Q., vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 128–144, 2014, doi: 10.1177/0741713613513633.
S. Geng, K. M. Y. Law, and B. Niu, “Investigating self-directed learning and technology readiness in blending learning environment,” Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ., vol. 16, no. 1, 2019, doi: 10.1186/s41239-019-0147-0.
S. Imel, “Using Groups in Adult Learning: Theory and Practice,” J. Contin. Educ. Health Prof., vol. 19, pp. 54–61, 1999.
S. M. Samin, R. Pebrian, and A. Zulkifli, “Heutagogy Approaches for Arabic Learning in Higher Education in Industrial Revolution 4.0,” in Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Social, Economy, Education and Humanity, 2019, no. November, pp. 454–457, doi: 10.5220/0009382304540457.
T. Chacko, “Emerging pedagogies for effective adult learning: From andragogy to heutagogy,” Arch. Med. Heal. Sci., vol. 6, no. 2, p. 278, 2018, doi: 10.4103/AMHS.amhs_141_18.
T. Zagir and K. M. Mandel, “Competences of adult learning facilitators in Europe: Analyses of five European research projects,” Hungarian Educ. Res. J., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 155–171, 2020, doi: 10.1556/063.2020.00016.
V. C. Delisle et al., “Effect of support group peer facilitator training programmes on peer facilitator and support group member outcomes: A systematic review,” BMJ Open, vol. 6, no. 11, 2016, doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013325.
V. Narayan, J. Herrington, and T. Cochrane, “Design principles for heutagogical learning: Implementing student-determined learning with mobile and social media tools,” Australas. J. Educ. Technol., vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 86–101, 2019, doi: 10.14742/ajet.3974.
Y. Chawla and R. Singh, “Pedagogy to andragogy to heutagogy - a compulsive journey,” no. February, pp. 1–11, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://www.academia.edu/6862620/Pedagogy_to_Andragogy_to_Heutagogy_-_a_compulsive_journey.
Z. Palak and B. Papuda-Dolińska, “Self-actualisation as an essential dimension of professional competence of special teacher,” Ann. Univ. Mariae Curie-Skłodowska, Sect. J, Paedagog., vol. 27, no. 2, p. 9, Mar. 2015, doi: 10.17951/j.2014.27.2.9.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan is an Open Access Journal. The authors who publish the manuscript in Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan agree to the following terms.
Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0)
-
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
-
ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
- You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
- No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.