The Effect of Teachers' Level of Self-Regulated Learning and Internet Self-Efficacy on Teaching Innovation in the Constructivist Curriculum

Authors

  • Eka Budhi Santosa Universitas Sebelas Maret, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Surakarta, Indonesia
  • Fatma Sukmawati Universitas Sebelas Maret, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Surakarta, Indonesia
  • Ratna Juwita Universitas Sebelas Maret, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Surakarta, Indonesia
  • Relly Prihatin Universitas Sebelas Maret, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Surakarta, Indonesia
  • Budi Tri Cahyono Universitas Sebelas Maret, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Surakarta, Indonesia
  • Suparmi Universitas Sebelas Maret, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Surakarta, Indonesia

Keywords:

Self-Regulated Learning, Internet Self-Efficacy, Teaching Innovation, Constructivist Curriculum

Abstract

In the era of modern education, innovation in teaching is a crucial aspect for improving learning quality. This study aims to find out the extent to which Internet Self-Efficacy (ISE) of teachers affects learning innovation in the constructivist curriculum and the extent to which Self-Regulated Learning (SRL) affects teachers in making learning innovations in the constructivist curriculum. The research method used is quantitative with a survey approach. Data was collected through a questionnaire filled out by 97 junior high school teachers in Central Java who implemented a constructivist curriculum. Based on the results of the regression analysis, it was found that in the condition that teachers have a high level of Internet self-efficacy, self-regulated learning (SRL) has a significant effect on the learning innovations that are carried out by teachers.  Another condition is the influence of SRL with low teacher ISE on teacher learning innovation. In the condition of low self-efficacy levels, SRL indicators of metacognitive skills, time management, and environmental settings did not have a significant effect on teachers' learning innovation. These findings indicate that teachers with high levels of self-regulated learning (SRL) and internet self-efficacy tend to be more innovative in implementing teaching methods that are in accordance with the principles of constructivism. The implications of this study emphasize the importance of developing teachers' self-regulated learning (SRL) and internet self-efficacy skills through continuous training and professional development programs to improve the quality of teaching in constructivist curricula.

References

Androutsos, A., & Brinia, V. (2019). Developing and piloting a pedagogy for teaching innovation, collaboration, and co-creation in secondary education based on design thinking, digital transformation, and entrepreneurship. Education Sciences, 9(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9020113

Barnard, L., Lan, W. Y., To, Y. M., Paton, V. O., & Lai, S. L. (2009). Measuring self-regulation in online and blended learning environments. Internet and Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.10.005

Batool, H. (2022). Augmented reality applications as a digital learning innovation in response to the pandemic. Frontiers in Education, 7(September), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.937074

Bautista-Quispe, J. A., Estrada-Araoz, E. G., Yana-Salluca, M., Gallegos, Z. E. C., Coaquira, R. R. A., Reyes, B. V., Sosa, J. S., & Alanoca, V. R. M. (2023). Monitoring, Support and Inter-Learning in Teaching Performance in Basic Education of the Area of Mathematics. A Case Study in Puno (Perú). International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 22(5), 479–492. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.5.24

Bećirović, S., Ahmetović, E., & Skopljak, A. (2022). An Examination of Students Online Learning Satisfaction, Interaction, Self-efficacy and Self-regulated Learning. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 11(1), 16–35. https://doi.org/10.13187/ejced.2022.1.16

Bell, S. (2010). Project-Based Learning for the 21st Century: Skills for the Future. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 83(2), 39–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098650903505415

Bommel, M. Van, Boshuizen, H. P. A., & Kwakman, K. (2015). Appreciation of a constructivist curriculum for learning theoretical knowledge by social work students with different kinds and levels of learning motivation. International Journal of Educational Research, 71, 65–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2015.03.002

Buchanan, T., Sainter, P., & Saunders, G. (2013). Factors affecting faculty use of learning technologies: Implications for models of technology adoption. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 25(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-013-9066-6

Chen, C. Y., Su, S. W., Lin, Y. Z., & Sun, C. T. (2023). The Effect of Time Management and Help-Seeking in Self-Regulation-Based Computational Thinking Learning in Taiwanese Primary School Students. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(16). https://doi.org/10.3390/su151612494

Chen, W., Pi, Z., Tan, J. S. H., & Lyu, Q. (2022). Preparing pre-service teachers for instructional innovation with ICT via co-design practice. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 38(5), 133–145. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.7743

Chiu, T. K. F. (2024). A classification tool to foster self-regulated learning with generative artificial intelligence by applying self-determination theory: a case of ChatGPT. Educational Technology Research and Development, 0123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-024-10366-w

Cristea, T., Snijders, C., Matzat, U., & Kleingeld, A. (2023). Unobtrusive measurement of self-regulated learning: A clickstream-based multi-dimensional scale. Education and Information Technologies, 0123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12372-6

Dignath, C., van Ewijk, R., Perels, F., & Fabriz, S. (2023). Let Learners Monitor the Learning Content and Their Learning Behavior! A Meta-analysis on the Effectiveness of Tools to Foster Monitoring. In Educational Psychology Review (Vol. 35, Issue 2). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09718-4

Dindar, M., Malmberg, J., Järvelä, S., Haataja, E., & Kirschner, P. A. (2020). Matching self-reports with electrodermal activity data: Investigating temporal changes in self-regulated learning. Education and Information Technologies, 25(3), 1785–1802. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10059-5

Dinh, T. C., & Nguyen, P. B. N. (2022). Impact of Internet Self-Efficacy and Self-Regulated Learning on Satisfaction and Academic Achievement in Online Learning: A Case Study in Vietnam. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 17(16), 269–288. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v17i16.33819

Duradoni, M., Meacci, S., Panerai, G., Salvatori, G., & Guazzini, A. (2022). Development and Validation of the Social Media Capital Scale (SMC): A Brand New Measure for Online Social Capital. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9903615

Eastin, M. S., & LaRose, R. (2000). Internet self-efficacy and the psychology of the digital divide. In Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2000.tb00110.x

Ellianawati, E., Subali, B., Khotimah, S. N., Cholila, M., & Darmahastuti, H. (2021). Face-to-face mode vs. Online mode: A discrepancy in analogy-based learning during covid-19 pandemic. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 10(3), 368–377. https://doi.org/10.15294/JPII.V10I3.30037

Garnett, J. (2013). Beyond a constructivist curriculum: A critique of competing paradigms in music education. British Journal of Music Education, 30(2), 161–175. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265051712000575

Gupta, P., & Bamel, U. (2023). A Study on the Relationship between Domain Specific Self-Efficacy and Self-Regulation in E-learning Contexts. Online Learning Journal, 27(4), 440–460. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v27i4.3658

Guskey, T. R. (1988). Teacher efficacy, self-concept, and attitudes toward the implementation of instructional innovation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 4(1), 63–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/0742-051X(88)90025-X

Heikkinen, S., Saqr, M., Malmberg, J., & Tedre, M. (2023). Supporting self-regulated learning with learning analytics interventions – a systematic literature review. Education and Information Technologies, 28(3), 3059–3088. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11281-4

Hsu, M. H., & Chiu, C. M. (2004). Internet self-efficacy and electronic service acceptance. Decision Support Systems. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2003.08.001

Hsu, P. C., Chang, I. H., & Chen, R. S. (2020). Early Childhood Educators’ Attitudes to Internet Self-Efficacy and Internet-Related Instructional Applications: The Mediating Effects of Internet Enjoyment and Professional Support. SAGE Open, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020914390

Hung, M. L. (2016). Teacher readiness for online learning: Scale development and teacher perceptions. Computers and Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.012

Imms, W., & Byers, T. (2017). Impact of classroom design on teacher pedagogy and student engagement and performance in mathematics. Learning Environments Research, 20(1), 139–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-016-9210-0

Jansen, R. S., van Leeuwen, A., Janssen, J., & Kester, L. (2018). Validation of the Revised Self-regulated Online Learning Questionnaire. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98572-5_9

Joo, Y. J., Bong, M., & Choi, H. J. (2000). Self-efficacy for self-regulated learning, academic self-efficacy, and internet self-efficacy in web-based instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02313398

Kao, C. P., & Chien, H. M. (2017). Web-searching to learn: The role of internet self-efficacy in pre-school educators’ conceptions and approaches. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(6), 2039–2056. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.01212a

Karlen, Y., Bäuerlein, K., & Brunner, S. (2024). Teachers’ assessment of self-regulated learning: Linking professional competences, assessment practices, and judgment accuracy. In Social Psychology of Education (Vol. 27, Issue 2). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-023-09845-4

Kim, Y., & Glassman, M. (2013a). Beyond search and communication: Development and validation of the Internet Self-efficacy Scale (ISS). Computers in Human Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.01.018

Kim, Y., & Glassman, M. (2013b). Beyond search and communication: Development and validation of the Internet Self-efficacy Scale (ISS). Computers in Human Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.01.018

Lede, Y. U., Agung, A. A. G., Wisna, I. P., & Dantes, K. R. (2024). The Influence of Transformational Leadership on Work Motivation Has an Impact on Teacher Performance in Senior High Schools in Southwest Sumba Regency. International Journal of Religion, 5(3), 366–376. https://doi.org/10.61707/sf310r03

Li, N., Jiang, P., Li, C., & Wang, W. (2022). College Teaching Innovation from the Perspective of Sustainable Development: The Construction and Twelve-Year Practice of the 2P3E4R System. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14127130

Liang, Q., & Hainan, N. C. (2019). Adaptive Learning Model and Implementation Based on Big Data. 2019 2nd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Big Data, ICAIBD 2019, 183–186. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAIBD.2019.8836984

Liao, H., Zhang, Q., Yang, L., & Fei, Y. (2023). Investigating relationships among regulated learning, teaching presence and student engagement in blended learning: An experience sampling analysis. Education and Information Technologies, 28(10), 12997–13025. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11717-5

Ludvigsen, S. (2016). CSCL: connecting the social, emotional and cognitive dimensions. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 11(2), 115–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-016-9236-4

Mailool, J., Kartowagiran, B., Retnowati, T. H., Wening, S., & Putranta, H. (2020). The effects of principal’s decision-making, organizational commitment and school climate on teacher performance in vocational high school based on teacher perceptions. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(4), 1675–1687. https://doi.org/10.12973/EU-JER.9.4.1675

Mangkhang, C., Kaewpanya, N., Jansiri, P., Nuansawan, P., Srichana, M., Anukul, P., & Saaardluan, S. (2022). Advancing Transformative Learning to Develop Competency in Teaching Social Studies Online of Pre-service Teacher Students in Chiang Mai Education Sandbox. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 11(5), 128–137. https://doi.org/10.5430/JCT.V11N5P128

Mejeh, M., Sarbach, L., & Hascher, T. (2024). Effects of adaptive feedback through a digital tool – a mixed-methods study on the course of self-regulated learning. In Education and Information Technologies (Issue 0123456789). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12510-8

Moreno, M. S., & Martínez, A. M. (2022). Analysis of the Flipped Classroom Model as a Proposal for Teaching Innovation. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 22(10), 30–37. https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v22i10.5385

Morgan, G. B., Hodge, K. J., Trepinksi, T. M., & Anderson, L. W. (2014). The Stability of Teacher Performance and Effectiveness: Implications for Policies Concerning Teacher Evaluation. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 22, 95. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v22n95.2014

Nantha, C., Pimdee, P., & Sitthiworachart, J. (2022). A Quasi-Experimental Evaluation of Classes Using Traditional Methods, Problem-Based Learning, and Flipped Learning to Enhance Thai Student-Teacher Problem-Solving Skills and Academic Achievement. In International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (Vol. 17, Issue 14, pp. 20–38). https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v17i14.30903

Nguyen, A., Lämsä, J., Dwiarie, A., & Järvelä, S. (2024). Lifelong learner needs for human-centered self-regulated learning analytics. Information and Learning Science, 125(1–2), 68–108. https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-07-2023-0091

Nurullin, R. A. (2019). Society 5.0: A self-devouring system. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 8(2), 4001–4004. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijrte.B3052.078219

Oyelere, S. S., Olaleye, S. A., Balogun, O. S., & Tomczyk, Ł. (2021). Do teamwork experience and self-regulated learning determine the performance of students in an online educational technology course? Education and Information Technologies, 26(5), 5311–5335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10535-x

Pellegrino, J. W., Hilton, M. L., & Learning, D. D. (2012). Education for life and work: developing transferable knowledge and skills in the 21st century. In National Academies Press. https://doi.org/0-309-25649-6

Purwanta, H. (2023). Indonesian secondary history literacy skills level: a case study of public and private high schools in Sukoharjo Regency, Central Java. Multidisciplinary Science Journal, 5(March 2020), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.31893/multiscience.2023050

Ratnawati, N., & Idris. (2020). Improving student capabilities through research-based learning innovation on E-learning system. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 15(4), 195–205. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i04.11820

Santosa, E. B., Degeng, I. N. S., Sulton, & Kuswandi, D. (2020). The effects of mobile computer-supported collaborative learning to improve problem solving and achievements. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.656642

Santosa, E. B., & Sarwanta, S. (2021). Pengaruh Tingkat Internet Self-Efficacy, Pengalaman Mengajar dan Usia Guru Terhadap Peguasaan Komputer dalam Strategi Pembelajaran Daring. Jurnal Pendidikan Edutama, 8(1), 41. https://doi.org/10.30734/jpe.v8i1.1489

Shen, D., Cho, M. H., Tsai, C. L., & Marra, R. (2013). Unpacking online learning experiences: Online learning self-efficacy and learning satisfaction. Internet and Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.04.001

Sui, C. J., Yen, M. H., & Chang, C. Y. (2024). Teachers’ perceptions of teaching science with technology-enhanced self-regulated learning strategies through the DECODE model. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12715-x

Sumarmi, Wahyuningtyas, N., Sahrina, A., & Aliman, M. (2022). The Effect of Environmental Volunteer Integrated with Service Learning (EV_SL) to Improve Student’s Environment Care Attitudes and Soft Skills. Pegem Egitim ve Ogretim Dergisi, 12(1), 168–176. https://doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.12.01.16

Tambunan, H., Sinaga, B., & Widada, W. (2021). Analysis of teacher performance to build student interest and motivation towards mathematics achievement. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 10(1), 42–47. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v10i1.20711

Thwe, W. P., & Kálmán, A. (2024). Lifelong Learning in the Educational Setting: A Systematic Literature Review. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 33(2), 407–417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-023-00738-w

Tuasikal, A. R. S., Hartoto, S., Prakoso, B. B., Kartiko, D. C., & Hariyanto, A. (2021). the Analysis on Teaching Skills and Learning Effectiveness of Internship Students. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 40(3), 650–658. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v40i3.40466

Vidal, D. D. (2020). The new era of teaching: Using video games to teach macroeconomics. In Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice (Vol. 20, Issue 13, pp. 181–192). https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v20i13.3843

Vilkova, K., & Shcheglova, I. (2021). Deconstructing self-regulated learning in MOOCs: In search of help-seeking mechanisms. Education and Information Technologies, 26(1), 17–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10244-x

Wahyudi, T. N., Adityarini, H., Harsono, Puspitasari, A., & Wahyuni, N. (2023). The Effect of the Use of the Internet for Learning Activities and Pedagogic Abilities on Teacher Performance. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 23(9), 28–33. https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v23i9.6127

Wilkerson, L. (2022). Constructivist Curriculum for Christian Transformation. Christian Education Journal, 19(1), 32–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739891320985870

Xing, D., & Lu, C. (2022). Predicting Key Factors Affecting Secondary School Students’ Computational Thinking Skills Under the Smart Classroom Environment: Evidence From the Science Course. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 21(1), 156–170. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/22.21.156

Yildirim, A., & Kasapoglu, K. (2015). Teachers’ perceptions of constructivist curriculum change as a predictor of their perceptions of the implementation of constructivist teaching–learning activities. Asia Pacific Education Review, 16(4), 565–577. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-015-9394-5

Zhang, J. (2010a). Technology-supported learning innovation in cultural contexts. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(2), 229–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-009-9137-6

Zhang, J. (2010b). Technology-supported learning innovation in cultural contexts. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(2), 229–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-009-9137-6

Zimmerman, B. J. (1986). Becoming a self-regulated learner: Which are the key subprocesses? Contemporary Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-476X(86)90027-5

Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical background, methodological developments, and future prospects. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 166–183. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831207312909

Zimmerman, B. J., Bonner, S., & Kovach, R. (2004). Developing self-regulated learners: Beyond achievement to self-efficacy. In Developing self-regulated learners: Beyond achievement to self-efficacy. https://doi.org/10.1037/10213-000

Downloads

Published

2024-08-31

How to Cite

Budhi Santosa, E., Sukmawati, F., Juwita, R., Prihatin, R., Tri Cahyono, B., & Suparmi. (2024). The Effect of Teachers’ Level of Self-Regulated Learning and Internet Self-Efficacy on Teaching Innovation in the Constructivist Curriculum. JTP - Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 26(2), 657–675. Retrieved from https://journal.unj.ac.id/unj/index.php/jtp/article/view/48474

Issue

Vol. 26 No. 2 (2024): Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan

Section

Full Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Eka budhi santosa, Fatma Sukmawati, Ratna Juwita, Relly Prihatin, Budi Tri Cahyono, Suparmi

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan is an Open Access Journal. The authors who publish the manuscript in Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan agree to the following terms.

Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0)

  • Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.

  • ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.

  • No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

Notices:

 

  • You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
  • No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.