The Effect of Direct Instructions Strategy Integrated Computational Thinking and Prior Knowledge on Critical Thinking and Problem-solving
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21009/jtp.v25i3.49845Keywords:
Direct Instruction, Computational Thinking, Prior Knowledge, Problem-SolvingAbstract
In the current digital era, critical thinking and problem-solving skills are becoming increasingly important in everyday life, especially in the industrial era 4.0. One way to develop this ability is to use computational Thinking methods (CT). This research aims to test the effect of direct instruction strategy, integrated computational thinking, and prior knowledge on elementary schools' critical thinking and problem-solving skills in Heat and Changes in Science. The method used in this research is a quasi-experimental pretest-posttest non-equivalent control group design. This research was conducted at Madrasah Ibtidyah Ar-Rahmah Samarinda, involving 58 research subjects. The research instrument includes a prior knowledge test and critical thinking and problem-solving skills. To test the prerequisites for analysis using the normality test and homogeneity. Data analysis was used to test the research hypothesis using parametric statistics Tow Way MANOVA analysis technique. The research results show that (1) There are significant differences in critical thinking skills between groups of students who use computational learning and direct learning methods instructions; (2) critical thinking skills between groups of students with high prior knowledge are significantly from low prior knowledge; (3) There is no interaction between computational thinking and prior knowledge on students' critical thinking skills; (4) There are significant differences in problem-solving skills between groups of students who use computational learning and direct learning instructions; (5) The problem-solving skills of students with high prior knowledge is significantly different with low prior knowledge; (6) There is interaction between computational thinking and prior knowledge on students' problem-solving skills.
References
Aliftika, O., Purwanto, P., & Utari, S. (2019). Profil Keterampilan Abad 21 Siswa SMA pada Pembelajaran Project Based Learning (PjBL) Materi Gerak Lurus. WaPFi (Wahana Pendidikan Fisika), 4(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.17509/wapfi.v4i2.20178
Alreshidi, N. A. K. (2023). Enhancing topic-specific prior knowledge of students impacts their outcomes in mathematics. Frontiers in Education, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1050468
Al-Zou’bi, R. (2021). The impact of media and information literacy on acquiring the critical thinking skill by the educational faculty’s students. Thinking Skills and Creativity. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S187118712030256X
Angraini, L. M., Arcat, & Sohibun. (2022). Improvement of Computational Thinking through Interactive Multimedia Learning Based on Initial Mathematical Ability. International Journal of Contemporary Studies in Education (IJ-CSE), 1(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.56855/ijcse.v1i1.25
Aranda, G., & Ferguson, J. P. (2022). The Creative in Computational Thinking. Children’s Creative Inquiry in STEM. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94724-8_18
Arık, M. (2022). Computational Thinking Integration into Science Classrooms: Example of Digestive System. In Journal of Science Education and Technology (Vol. 31, Issue 1, pp. 99–115). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-021-09934-z
Astutik, F., & Wijayanti, E. (2020). Meta-Analysis: The Effect of Learning Methods on Students’ Critical Thinking Skills in Biological Materials. Jurnal Studi Guru Dan Pembelajaran, 3(3), Article 3.
Bandura, A. (2017). Psychological Modeling: Conflicting Theories. Transaction Publishers.
Bekteshi, E. (2017). The ’Fours Cs—Collaboration, Communication, Critical Thinking And Creativity At The Faculty Of Arts (FLUP), University Of Porto, Porto, Portugal. Journal of International Social Research, 10, 56–62. https://doi.org/10.17719/jisr.2017.1638
Chami̇dy, T., Degeng, İ. N. S., & Ulfa, S. (2020). The Effect of Problem Based Learning and Tacit Knowledge on Problem-Solving Skills of Students in Computer Network Practice Course. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 8(2), 691–700. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.650400
Chan, S. W. (2020). Computational thinking activities in number patterns: A study in a Singapore secondary school. In ICCE 2020—28th International Conference on Computers in Education, Proceedings (Vol. 1, pp. 171–176).
Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791
Darmayanti, R., Sugianto, R., & Muhammad, Y. (2022). Analysis of Students’ Adaptive Reasoning Ability in Solving HOTS Problems Arithmetic Sequences and Series in Terms of Learning Style. Numerical: Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 73–90. https://doi.org/10.25217/numerical.v6i1.2340
Depari, D. M., Matondang, A., & Syahlan. (2021). Development of Based Student Worksheets Realistic Mathematics Learning Model For improvement of Critical thinking skills Class XI Vocational High School Students. Journal of Mathematics Technology and Education, 1(1), 30–37. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.32734/jomte.v1i1.7576
Dörner, D., & Funke, J. (2017). Complex Problem-solving: What It Is and What It Is Not. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1153. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01153
Greenstein, M. N. (2012). Creative judging: Ethics issues in problem-solving courts. Judges Journal, 51(2).
Güner, P., & Erbay, H. N. (2021). Prospective mathematics teachers’ thinking styles and problem-solving skills. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 40, 100827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100827
Holmes, P., Ganassin, S., & Li, S. (2022). Reflections on the co-construction of an interpretive approach to interculturality for higher education in China. Language and Intercultural Communication, 22(5), 503–518. https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2022.2114491
Huang, W., & Looi, C. K. (2021). A critical review of literature on “unplugged” pedagogies in K-12 computer science and computational thinking education. Computer Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2020.1789411
John Lemay, D., Basnet, R. B., Doleck, T., Bazelais, P., & Saxena, A. (2021). Instructional interventions for computational thinking: Examining the link between computational thinking and academic performance. Computers and Education Open, 2, 100056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2021.100056
Kania, N., Fitriani, C., & Bonyah, E. (2023). Analysis of Students’ Critical Thinking Skills Based on Prior Knowledge Mathematics. International Journal of Contemporary Studies in Education (IJ-CSE), 2. https://doi.org/10.56855/ijcse.v2i1.248
Kawuri, K. R., Budiharti, R., & Fauzi, A. (2019). Penerapan Computational Thinking untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Kelas X MIA 9 SMA Negeri 1 Surakarta pada Materi Usaha dan Energi 6. Jurnal Materi Dan Pembelajaran Fisika (JMPF), 9(2), 116–121.
Limbong, N., Herlina, K., Maulina, H., & Abdurrahman, A. (2023). Problem-Solving and Computational Thinking Practices: Lesson Learned from The Implementation of ExPRession Model. JIPF (Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Fisika), 8(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.26737/jipf.v8i1.3042
Liu, Y., & Pásztor, A. (2022). Effects of problem-based learning instructional intervention on critical thinking in higher education: A meta-analysis. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 45, 101069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101069
Lukitasari, M., Hasan, R., Sukri, A., & Handhika, J. (2021). Developing Student’s Metacognitive Ability in Science through Project-Based Learning with E-Portfolio. … and Research in Education. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1312927
Montuori, C., Gambarota, F., Altoè, G., & Arfe, B. (2023). The cognitive effects of computational thinking: A systematic review and meta-analytic study. Computers & Education, 210, 104961. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104961
Nurhatmanti, R., Lian, B., & Dedy, A. (2021). Analysis of Students’ Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) in Natural Science Subjects Class V Elementary School. Indonesian Journal of Primary Education, 5(2), 208–213. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijpe.v5i2.37107
Ramadhani*, S. H., Karyanto, P., & Sugiharto, B. (2023). Biology-Critical Thinking Skills of High School Students in Terms of Gender and School Location. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia, 11(4), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.24815/jpsi.v11i4.31760
Sagala, P., & Andriani, A. (2019). Development of Higher-Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) Questions of Probability Theory Subject Based on Bloom’s Taxonomy. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1188, 012025. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1188/1/012025
Şahin Gökçearslan, Uluyol, Ç., & Şahin, S. (2018). Smartphone addiction, cyberloafing, stress and social support among university students: A path analysis. Children and Youth Services Review, 91, 47–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.05.036
Saphira, H. V., & Prahani, B. K. (2022). Profile of Senior High School Students’ Critical Thinking Skills and The Need of Implementation PBL Model Assisted by Augmented Reality Book. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia, 10(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.24815/jpsi.v10i3.25031
Sepriyanti, N., Nelwati, S., Kustati, M., & Afriadi, J. (2022). The Effect of 21st-Century Learning on Higher-Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) and Numerical Literacy of Science Students in Indonesia based on Gender. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 11(2), 314–321. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v11i2.36384
Tang, T., Vezzani, V., & Eriksson, V. (2020). Developing critical thinking, collective creativity skills and problem-solving through playful design jams. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 37, 100696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100696
Thornhill-Miller, B., Camarda, A., Mercier, M., Burkhardt, J.-M., Morisseau, T., Bourgeois-Bougrine, S., Vinchon, F., El Hayek, S., Augereau-Landais, M., Mourey, F., Feybesse, C., Sundquist, D., & Lubart, T. (2023). Creativity, Critical Thinking, Communication, and Collaboration: Assessment, Certification, and Promotion of 21st Century Skills for the Future of Work and Education. Journal of Intelligence, 11(3), 54. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11030054
Tuckman, B. W. (1999). Conducting Educational Research. Harcourt Brace College Publishers.
Valls Pou, A., Canaleta, X., & Fonseca, D. (2022). Computational Thinking and Educational Robotics Integrated into Project-Based Learning. Sensors, 22, 3746. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22103746
van Laar, E., van Deursen, A. J. A. M., van Dijk, J. A. G. M., & de Haan, J. (2020). Determinants of 21st-Century Skills and 21st-Century Digital Skills for Workers: A Systematic Literature Review. Sage Open, 10(1), 2158244019900176. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019900176
Widyaningsih, B., & Sulisworo, D. (2023). The Role of Learning Interest and Prior Knowledge on Critical Thinking Skills in E-Worksheet Supported Learning. 207–215. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-114-2_20
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Siti Maulidah, Punaji Setyosari, Dedi Kuswandi, Saida Ulfa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan is an Open Access Journal. The authors who publish the manuscript in Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan agree to the following terms.
Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0)
-
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
-
ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
- You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
- No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.