Development of Mobile Exam Application to Prevent Student Exam Cheating on High School Computational Thinking Informatics Materials
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21009/jtp.v26i3.49938Keywords:
Mobile exam app, cheating prevention, computational thinkingAbstract
This study aims to develop a mobile-exam application to prevent cheating during online exams in high school computational thinking. The research follows the 4D development model (Define, Design, Develop, Disseminate) and collects data through questionnaires, observations, pre-test and post-test in control and experimental classes. Sample included 72 respondents divided into control and experimental classes. The analysis involves descriptive and statistical methods to compare test result and cheating frequencies. Result indicate that the use of the mobile exam app significantly decreases cheating occurrences compared to traditional methods. The number of cheating incidents decreased from 20 in the control classes to 5 in the experimental classes, demonstrating the application's effectiveness in promoting academic integrity. Furthermore, the experimental class using the app shows improvement in post-test by 13 points compared to a 5-point increase in the control classes, demonstrating that the app not only prevents cheating but also enhances student learning outcomes. This app contributes to promoting academic integrity in online education settings, offering an innovative solution for improving exam security and student performance.
References
Abdullahi, R. & Mansor, N. (2015). Fraud Triangle Theory and Fraud Diamond Theory: Understanding the convergent and divergent for future research. International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, 5(4), 38-45. https://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARAFMS/v5-i3/1823
Al_airaji, R. M.., Aljazaery, I. A., Alrikabi, H. T., & Alaidi, A. H. M. (2022). Automated Cheating Detection based on Video Surveillance in the Examination Classes. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 16(08), 124–137. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v16i08.30157
Bierstaker, J., Brink, W.D., Khatoon, S. et al. (2024). Academic Fraud and Remote Evaluation of Accounting Students: An Application of the Fraud Triangle. Journal of Bus Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-024-05628-9
Chen, D., Zhou, B., Koltun, V., & Krähenbühl, P. (2020). Learning by cheating. Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, 100, 66–75. http://proceedings.mlr.press/v100/chen20a/chen20a.pdf
Conrad, D., & Openo, J. (2018). Assessment strategies for online learning: Engagement and authenticity. Athabasca University Press.
Djaelani, Y., Zainuddin, Z., & Mustari Mokoginta, R. (2022). Academic fraud of students in the Covid-19 period: Testing with the Pentagon’s fraud dimension. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), 11(2), 414–422. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v11i2.1640
Duhaim, A. M., Al-mamory, S. O., & Mahdi, M. S. (2022). Cheating Detection in Online Exams during Covid-19 Pandemic Using Data Mining Techniques. Webology, 19(1), 341-366. https://doi.org/10.14704/WEB/V19I1/WEB19026
Ekowati, M. A. S. and Arsini, D. (2017). Pemakaian Alat Bantu Prototype Model Aplikasi Jarimatika Sederhana dan Menarik Pada Pembelajaran Berhitung Anak Usia Dini. Prosiding Seminar Nasional ReTII ke-10, 2015, 929-951.
Fegasanti, P., & Priyatmojo, A. (2020). Students’ perception on the use of android-based exam browser to assess final examination. ELT Forum: Journal of English Language Teaching, 9(2), 162-170. https://doi.org/10.15294/elt.v9i2.40073
Fernandez, A., & Shaw, G. P. (2020). Academic leadership in a time of crisis: The coronavirus and COVID-19. Journal of Leadership Studies, 14(1), 39–45. https://doi.org/10.1002/jls.21684
Gallant, T. B. (2017). Academic integrity as a teaching & learning issue: From theory to practice. Theory into Practice, 56(2), 88–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2017.1308173
Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Educause Review, 27(2020). https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning
Kemendikbudristek. (2022). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset dan Teknologi No. 56 Tahun 2022 Tentang Kurikulum merdeka.
Kemenkeu. (2020). Peraturan Menteri Keuangan Nomor 39/PMK.02/2020 tentang Tata Cara Revisi Anggaran Tahun Anggaran 2020. Jakarta: Kemenkeu.
Kumar, Vijay. (2016). 101 Metode Desain. Diterjemahkan oleh: Irene Christin. Penerbit PT Alex Media Komputindo Kelompok Gramedia.
Muhajirah. (2022). Basic of Learning Theory (Behaviorism, Cognitivism, Constructivism, and Humanism). International Journal of Asian Education, 1(1), 37-42. https://doi.org/10.46966/ijae.v1i1.23
Munoz, A., & Mackay, J. (2019). An online testing design choice typology towards cheating threat minimisation. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 16(3), 1-16. https://ro.uow.edu.au/jutlp/vol16/iss3/5
Riduwan. (2018). Skala Pengukuran Variabel-Variabel Penelitian. Alfabeta.
Santosa, E. B., & Fatma, S. (2023). Ability to Solve Complex Social Problem of Prospective Teachers according to Gender and Computational Thinking. Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 25(3), 394-405. https://journal.unj.ac.id/unj/index.php/jtp/article/download/38749/16458
Schneider, S. L., Council, M. L. (2021). Distance learning in the era of COVID-19. Arch Dermatol Res, 313, 389–390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00403-020-02088-9
Shew, D. P., & Maletsky, L. P., & Clark, G., & McVey, M. (2019, June), Practice Exam Program Impact on Student Academic Performance and Student Retention Paper presented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida. 10.18260/1-2—33182.
Slameto. (2015). Belajar dan faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhinya. Cetakan. Keenam. PT Rineka Cipta.
Smith, K., Emerson, D., Haight, T., & Wood, B. (2023). An examination of online cheating among business students through the lens of the dark triad and fraud diamond. Ethics & Behavior, 33(6), 433–460.
Subana, M., Rahardi, M., & Sudrajat. (2000). Statistik Pendidikan. Pustaka
Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D (Edisi 2). Alfabeta.
Suharsimi Arikunto (2007). Program Penelitian. PT Rineka Putra.
Suhartini. (2017). Aplikasi Alat BANTU Belajar Bahasa Inggris Sekolah Dasar Menggunakan Adobe Flash CS6 (Studi Kasus: SDIT Fathona Baturaja). Jurnal Sistem Informasi Dan Komputererisasi Akuntansi (Jsk), 1(1), 71-80.
Tasdemır, S., Balcı, M., Cabi, A., Altin, M., et al. (2015). The Design and Application of Online Exam System Supported by Database. International Journal of Applied Mathematics Electronics and Computers, 3(3), 204-207. https://doi.org/10.18100/ijamec.43348
Thomas, J., & Jeffer, A. (2019). Mobile eye tracking and academic integrity: A proof-of-concept study in the United Arab Emirates. Accountability in Research, 27(5), 247-255. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2019.1646645
Tiny Thinkers. (2022). What’s Computational Thinking. Tiny Thinkers. https://www.tinythinkers.org/benefits
Wahyono, Musthofa, Asfarian, A., Rmadhan, D. A., Putro, H. P., Wisnubhadra, I., Saputra, B., & Pratiwi, H. (2021). Buku Panduan Guru Informatika untuk SMA Kelas X. Kemendikbudristek
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Mukhamad Khasan Tiarani, Triana Rejekiningsih, Sri Sumaryati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan is an Open Access Journal. The authors who publish the manuscript in Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan agree to the following terms.
Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0)
-
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
-
ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
- You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
- No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.