Augmented Reality Implementation in Financial Regulatory Education for Indonesian High School Students

Authors

  • Dian Permana Putri Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati, Cirebon, Indonesia
  • Yopi Nisa Febianti Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati, Cirebon, Indonesia
  • Endang Herawan Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati, Cirebon, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21009/jtp.v27i2.57830

Keywords:

Augmented Reality, Financial Literacy Education,, Technology Acceptance Model, Educational Technology, Financial Services Authority, Multimedia Learning, Indonesian Secondary Education

Abstract

Financial Services Authority (OJK) education among Indonesian tenth-grade students. Using a mixed-methods research and development approach with the ADDIE model, the study involved 40 students selected through purposive sampling for needs assessment incorporating Technology Acceptance Model constructs. An Android-based AR application was developed using Unity 3D engine and ARCore SDK, integrating interactive 3D visualizations with comprehensive OJK educational content. Expert validation was conducted by content and design specialists using structured evaluation rubrics. The needs assessment revealed strong student support for AR integration, with 67.5% expressing positive attitudes toward AR-based learning materials. A significant positive correlation (r = 0.734, p < 0.01) was found between media diversification and learning motivation. Technology readiness showed high perceived usefulness (M = 4.2, SD = 0.8) but moderate perceived ease of use (M = 3.1, SD = 0.9). Expert validation demonstrated high content validity (87.5%, CVI = 0.875) and acceptable design quality (77.8%, DQI = 0.778). The application successfully integrated four main OJK content modules with AR functionality, including interactive 3D organizational structure visualization. Findings provide strong empirical support for AR technology adoption in financial literacy education, validating constructivist and multimedia learning theories. The study establishes a replicable framework for AR educational material development, supporting continued educational technology innovation.

References

Akçayır, M., & Akçayır, G. (2017). Advantages and challenges associated with augmented reality for education: A systematic review of the literature. Educational Research Review, 20, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2016.11.002

Bacca-Acosta, J., Baldiris, S., Fabregat, R., Graf, S., & Kinshuk, D. (2014). Augmented Reality Trends in Education: A Systematic Review of Research and Applications. Educational Technology and Society, 17, 133–149.

Bower, M., Howe, C., McCredie, N., Robinson, A., & Grover, D. (2014). Augmented Reality in education - cases, places and potentials. Educational Media International, 51(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2014.889400

Branch, R. (2010). Instructional design: The ADDIE approach. In Instructional Design: The ADDIE Approach. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09506-6

Cai, S., Jiao, X., Li, J., Jin, P., Zhou, H., & Wang, T. (2022). Conceptions of Learning Science among Elementary School Students in AR Learning Environment: A Case Study of “The Magic Sound.” Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14116783

Chang, H.-Y., Binali, T., Liang, J.-C., Chiou, G.-L., Cheng, K.-H., Lee, S. W.-Y., & Tsai, C.-C. (2022). Ten years of augmented reality in education: A meta-analysis of (quasi-) experimental studies to investigate the impact. Computers & Education, 191, 104641. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104641

Chen, L., Chen, P. and Lin, Z. (2020). rtificial Intelligence in Education: A Review. IEEE Access, 8, 5264–75278. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2988510

Clark, J., & Paivio, A. (1987). A Dual Coding Perspective on Encoding Processes (pp. 5–33). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4676-3_1

Clark, R., Mayer, R., & Thalheimer, W. (2016). E-Learning and the Science of Instruction: Proven Guidelines for Consumers and Designers of Multimedia Learning. In John Wiley & Sons (Vol. 42). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119239086

Cruz-Loera, M., Montecillo-Puente, F.-J., & Lara-Rivera, A. (2024). Augmented reality in education: Transforming learning through technology. Revista de Tecnologías de La Información, 11. https://doi.org/10.35429/JIT.2024.11.31.1.7

Dhaas, A. (2024). Augmented Reality in Education: A Review of Learning Outcomes and Pedagogical Implications. American Journal of Computing and Engineering, 7, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.47672/ajce.2028

Elbadiansyah, E., Sain, Z., Aziz, A., Chanda, T., Abdullah, N., Sain, H., Aulia, L., Aziz, C., & Chansa, T. (2024). The Role of Innovation Management in Driving Educational Technology Adoption in Emerging Economies. International Journal of Humanities Education and Social Sciences, 3, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.58578/IJHESS.v3i1.4260

Familoni, B., & Onyebuchi, N. (2024). AUGMENTED AND VIRTUAL REALITY IN U.S. EDUCATION: A REVIEW: ANALYZING THE IMPACT, EFFECTIVENESS, AND FUTURE PROSPECTS OF AR/VR TOOLS IN ENHANCING LEARNING EXPERIENCES. International Journal of Applied Research in Social Sciences, 6, 642–663. https://doi.org/10.51594/ijarss.v6i4.1043

Fernandes, D., Lynch, J., & Netemeyer, R. (2014). Financial Literacy, Financial Education, and Downstream Financial Behaviors. Management Science. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2013.1849

Garzón, J. (2019). Meta-analysis of the impact of Augmented Reality on students’ learning gains. In Educational Research Review (Vol. 27, pp. 244–260). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.04.001

Garzón, J. (2021). An overview of twenty-five years of augmented reality in education. In Multimodal Technologies and Interaction (Vol. 5, Issue 7). https://doi.org/10.3390/mti5070037

Granić, A. (2022). Educational Technology Adoption: A systematic review. Education and Information Technologies, 27(7), 9725–9744. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10951-7

Hunaepi, H., Sudiatmika, A. A., & Fadly, W. (2023). Augmented Reality in Education: A Meta-Analysis Of (Quasi-) Experimental Studies to Investigate the Impact. Reflection Journal, 3, 74–87. https://doi.org/10.36312/rj.v3i2.1831

Huston, S. J. (2010). Measuring Financial Literacy. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 44(2), 296–316. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6606.2010.01170.x

Indonesia, B. (2021). Laporan Tahunan 2021. Direktorat Registrasi Obat Tradisional, Suplemen Kesehatan Dan Kosmetik Badan Pengawas Obat Dan Makanan, 220–225.

Khairiyah, F., Ramdan, M., & Suharyati, H. (2024). International Journal of Sustainable Development & Future Society Application of Augmented Reality-Based Learning Technology to Information Processing and Memory in Vocational High Schools : A Literature Review. 2(November), 54–61.

Lee, T., Y., W., M. Y., C., A. B., A., C. K., L., S., T., C. H., O., L. H., H., Y., X., & and Cai, Y. (2022). Investigation of virtual & augmented reality classroom learning environments in university STEM education. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(6), 2617–2632. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2155838

Lo, J. H., Lai, Y. F., & Hsu, T. L. (2021). The study of ar-based learning for natural science inquiry activities in taiwan’s elementary school from the perspective of sustainable development. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116283

Lu, S.-J., Lin, Y.-C., Tan, K., & Liu, Y.-C. (2022). Revolutionizing Elementary Disaster Prevention Education and Training via Augmented Reality-enhanced Collaborative Learning. International Journal of Engineering Business Management, 14, 184797902110673. https://doi.org/10.1177/18479790211067345

Lusardi, A., & Mitchell, O. S. (2014). The economic importance of financial literacy: Theory and evidence. Journal of Economic Literature, 52(1), 5–44. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.52.1.5

Ma, Q., & Liu, L. (2005). The Technology Acceptance Model. https://doi.org/10.4018/9781591404743.ch006.ch000

Magnone, K., & Yezierski, E. (2024). Beyond Convenience: A Case and Method for Purposive Sampling in Chemistry Teacher Professional Development Research. Journal of Chemical Education, 101. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00217

Mandell, L., & Klein, L. (2009). The Impact of Financial Literacy Education on Subsequent Financial Behavior. Journal of Financial Counseling and Planning, 20.

Marin-Rodriguez, W. J., Andrade-Girón, D., Zúñiga-Rojas, M., Susanibar-Ramirez, E., Calvo-Rivera, I., Ausejo Sánchez, J., & Caro-Soto, F. (2023). Artificial Intelligence and Augmented Reality in Higher Education: a systematic review. Data and Metadata, 2, 121. https://doi.org/10.56294/dm2023121

Mayer, R. E. (2021). Evidence-based principles for how to design effective instructional videos. Ournal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 10(2), 229–240. https://doi.org/https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1016/j.jarmac.2021.03.007

Mehiri, R. (2020). Gardner’s Multiple Intelligences Theory: Implications for Teachers and Students. ALTRALANG Journal, 2, 259–275. https://doi.org/10.52919/altralang.v2i01.64

Nielsen, J. (2012). Usability Engineering. Academic Press.

O’Connor, Y., & Mahony, C. (2023). Exploring the impact of augmented reality on student academic self-efficacy in higher education. Computers in Human Behavior, 149, 107963. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.107963

OECD. (2020). OECD Economic Outlook. In Rapport final (Issue 2). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1787/39a88ab1-en

Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2021). POJK No.12/POJK.03/2021 tentang Bank Umum. Www.Ojk.Go.Id, 1–113. https://sikepo.ojk.go.id/SIKEPO/DatabasePeraturan/PeraturanUtuh/84c36c57-c4bb-4815-9b13-c229

Piaget, J. (1977). The Development of Thought. Equilibration of Cognitive Structures. Basil Blackwell.

Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2006). The content validity index: Are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 29(5), 489-497.

Rahmayani, F., Kuswanto, H., & Rahmat, A. (2024). Development of E-Book Integrated Augmented Reality Based on STEM Approaches to Improve Critical Thinking and Multiple Representation Skills in Learning Physics. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 14. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2024.14.4.2087

Ruiz Muñoz, G., González, D., Amores, N., & Proaño, Á. (2024). Augmented reality’s impact on STEM learning. Salud, Ciencia y Tecnología, 4, 1202. https://doi.org/10.56294/saludcyt20241202

Venkatesh, V. (2014). Perceptions of effectiveness of instructional uses of technology in higher education in an era of web 2.0. In Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 110–119). https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2014.22

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press.

Wang, X.-M., Yu, D.-D., Yu, X.-H., Hwang, G.-J., & Li, F. (2024). Impacts of augmented reality-supported STEM education on students’ achievement: A meta-analysis of selected SSCI publications from 2010 to 2023. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 20547–20585. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12641-y

We Are Social Meltwater. (2023). Digital 2023 Report. Meltwater, 213.

Wu, H.-K., Lee, S. W.-Y., Chang, H.-Y., & Liang, J.-C. (2013). Current status, opportunities and challenges of augmented reality in education. Computers & Education, 62, 41–49. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.024

Zawacki-Richter, O., & Jung, I. (2023). Handbook of Open, Distance and Digital Education. In Handbook of Open, Distance and Digital Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2080-6

Downloads

Published

2025-08-31

How to Cite

Permana Putri, D., Nisa Febianti, Y., & Herawan, E. (2025). Augmented Reality Implementation in Financial Regulatory Education for Indonesian High School Students. JTP - Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 27(2), 598–618. https://doi.org/10.21009/jtp.v27i2.57830

Issue

Vol. 27 No. 2 (2025): Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan

Section

Full Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Dian Permana Putri, Yopi Nisa Febianti, Endang Herawan

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan is an Open Access Journal. The authors who publish the manuscript in Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan agree to the following terms.

Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0)

  • Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.

  • ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.

  • No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

Notices:

 

  • You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
  • No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.