Beyond Routine Exercise: Integrating Digital Problem-Posing Tools to Cultivate Creative Mathematical Fluency
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21009/jtp.v28i1.61645Keywords:
Creative Mathematical Fluency, Digital Mathematics Tool, Problem Posing, Technology-Enhanced LearningAbstract
Creative Mathematical Fluency (CMF), the ability to produce multiple, diverse, and original ideas with procedural accuracy, is crucial for 21st-century problem-solving. Still, routine drill and practice often fail to foster it. Studies indicate that problem-posing teaching can help students to generate divergent thoughts, but little is known about how digital problem-posing (DPP) tools influence CMF in real classrooms. The present study aimed to determine whether incorporating a cloud-based DPP curriculum in standard algebra-based lessons would improve middle-grade students' CMF scores compared to business-as-usual instruction, and to investigate the cognitive-affective processes associated with any such improvements. This six-week mixed-methods quasi-experimental research was conducted with 124 eighth-grade students at two similar Indonesian schools. Pre- and post-tests used the Creative Mathematical Fluency Test (CMFT) with Rasch-calibrated Fluency and Originality scales. Qualitative data identified richer structural diversity of posed problems, metacognitive reflection, and peer inspiration as driving factors. Students indicated increased enjoyment and eye percept creativity, despite some cognitive overload. Integrating DPP tasks meaningfully into algebra instruction can substantially raise CMF, suggesting that well-designed digital scaffolds can support learning "beyond routine exercise”.
References
Abramovich, S. (2022). Technology-Immune/Technology-Enabled Problem Solving as Agency of Design-Based Mathematics Education. Education Sciences, 12(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12080514
Acar, S., Lee, L. E., & Scherer, R. (2024). A Reliability Generalization of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking-Figural. In European Journal of Psychological Assessment. Hogrefe Publishing GmbH. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000819
Ada Yıldız, K., & Öztürk, M. (2023). Relationship between middle school students’ metacognition and problem-posing performance: A serial mediation analysis. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 7(5), 324–343. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.202323665
Bicer, A. (2021a). A systematic literature review: Discipline-specific and general instructional practices fostering the mathematical creativity of students. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 9(2), 252–281. https://doi.org/10.46328/IJEMST.1254
Bicer, A. (2021b). Multiple representations and mathematical creativity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100960
Bicer, A., Gooden, M., Sanders, M., & Perihan, C. (2025). Enhancing pre-service teachers’ mathematical creativity via STEM PBL: a mixed-methods study. Research in Mathematics Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2025.2488773
Bicer, A., Marquez, A., Colindres, K. V. M., Schanke, A. A., Castellon, L. B., Audette, L. M., Perihan, C., & Lee, Y. (2021). Investigating creativity-directed tasks in middle school mathematics curricula. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100823
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2023). Toward good practice in thematic analysis: Avoiding common problems and be(com)ing a knowing researcher. In International Journal of Transgender Health (Vol. 24, Issue 1, pp. 1–6). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1080/26895269.2022.2129597
Byrne, D. (2021). A Worked Example of Braun and Clarke’s Approach to Reflexive Thematic Analysis. Quality & Quantity, 56(3), 1391–1412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-021-01182-y
Cai, J., & Rott, B. (2024). On understanding mathematical problem-posing processes. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 56(1), 61–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-023-01536-w
Chatrakul Na Ayudhya, U., Edmondson, M., Harris, A., & Littel, F. (2023). Moving from responsibility learning inaction to ‘responsibility learning-in-action’: A student-educator collective writing on the ‘unnoticed’ in the hidden curriculum at business schools. Management Learning. https://doi.org/10.1177/13505076231164011
Czarnocha, B. (2021). Teaching-Research Analysis: The Constructivist Teaching Experiment as a Methodology of Teaching. In Creativity of an Aha! Moment and Mathematics Education (pp. 59–79). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004446434_003
DİVRİK, R. (2023). Effect of Teaching Mathematics Supported by Problem-posing Strategies on Problem-posing Skills. International Journal of Modern Education Studies, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.51383/ijonmes.2023.308
Elizabeth Vinitha, P. V, & Renumol, V. G. (2021). A literature review on technology-based problem-posing strategies in academia. 2021 International Conference on Innovative Trends in Information Technology, ICITIIT 2021. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICITIIT51526.2021.9399595
Essel, H. B., Vlachopoulos, D., Tachie-Menson, A., Johnson, E. E., & Ebeheakey, A. K. (2021). Technology-induced stress, sociodemographic factors, and association with academic achievement and productivity in ghanaian higher education during the covid-19 pandemic. Information (Switzerland), 12(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/info12120497
Hampson, T., & McKinley, J. (2023). Problems posing as solutions: Criticising pragmatism as a paradigm for mixed research. Research in Education, 116(1), 124–138. https://doi.org/10.1177/00345237231160085
Kaliisa, R., & Dolonen, J. A. (2023). CADA: a teacher-facing learning analytics dashboard to foster teachers’ awareness of students’ participation and discourse patterns in online discussions. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 28(3), 937–958. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-022-09598-7
Karavakou, M., Kynigos, C., & Sinclair, N. (2023). Bridging disciplinary aesthetics: when mathematics meets art through educational technology. Frontiers in Education, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1284718
Kiliç, Ç. (2024). Examination of the fraction addition problems posed by primary pre-service teachers using the digital storytelling method. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(10), 6915–6927. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2294772
Lampropoulos, G., Keramopoulos, E., Diamantaras, K., & Evangelidis, G. (2022). Augmented Reality and Gamification in Education: A Systematic Literature Review of Research, Applications, and Empirical Studies. In Applied Sciences (Switzerland) (Vol. 12, Issue 13). MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12136809
Lampropoulos, G., & Kinshuk. (2024). Virtual reality and gamification in education: a systematic review. Educational Technology Research and Development, 72(3), 1691–1785. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-024-10351-3
Lee, H. J., & Hwang, Y. (2022). Technology-Enhanced Education through VR-Making and Metaverse-Linking to Foster Teacher Readiness and Sustainable Learning. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084786
Lee, S.-Y. (2021). Research Status of Mathematical Problem Posing in Mathematics Education Journals. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 19(8), 1677–1693. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10128-z
Marco, N., & Palatnik, A. (2024). From “learning to variate” to “variate for learning”: Teachers learning through collaborative, iterative context-based mathematical problem posing. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2023.101119
Milinković, J. (2024). Visualization as a tool in teaching: Pre-service teachers’ competencies in visualization. In Elementary Mathematics Teaching Insights from 30 years of the Symposia on Elementary Mathematics Teaching (SEMT) (pp. 177–198). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192869647.003.0011
Nedaei, M., Radmehr, F., & Drake, M. (2022). Exploring undergraduate engineering students’ mathematical problem-posing: the case of integral-area relationships in integral calculus. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 24(2), 149–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2020.1858516
Passarella, S. (2022). Real Contexts in Problem-Posing: An Exploratory Study of Students’ Creativity. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, 30(1), 15–29. https://doi.org/10.30722/ijisme.30.01.002
Popović, B., Dimitrijević, S., Stanić, M., & Milenković, A. (2022). STUDENTS’ SUCCESS IN SOLVING MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS DEPENDING ON DIFFERENT REPRESENTATIONS. Teaching of Mathematics, 25(2), 74–92. https://doi.org/10.57016/TM-BAPU1403
Riley, K., & Soslau, E. G. (2022). What does it look like? A window into classroom-based critical service learning. Journal for Multicultural Education, 16(4), 362–373. https://doi.org/10.1108/JME-11-2021-0202
Scheiter, K. (2021). Technology-enhanced learning and teaching: an overview. Zeitschrift Fur Erziehungswissenschaft, 24(5), 1039–1060. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11618-021-01047-y
Scorringe, A., Philpot, R., & Bruce, T. (2021). Bringing socially-critical pedagogies to life through stories. Curriculum Studies in Health and Physical Education, 12(3), 217–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/25742981.2021.1906725
Sharma, M., Gupta, S., & Mahesh Kumar, T. (2024). Artificial intelligence in P-16 education: Transforming learning environments and student engagement. In Cases on Enhancing P-16 Student Engagement With Digital Technologies (pp. 55–73). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-5633-3.ch003
Sharp, J., & Brett, P. (2021). Ways into drama: Preparing for engagement. In International Perspectives on Drama and Citizenship Education: Acting Globally (pp. 131–140). Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003058144-13
Suh, J., Matson, K., Seshaiyer, P., Jamieson, S., & Tate, H. (2021). Mathematical modeling as a catalyst for equitable mathematics instruction: Preparing teachers and young learners with 21st century skills. Mathematics, 9(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9020162
Suri, A., & Juandi, D. (2021). A case study of analyzing 10thgrade students using what-if-not strategy for mathematical problem posing in trigonometry topic. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1806(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1806/1/012094
Tesfaw, B. K., Ayele, M. A., & Wondimuneh, T. E. (2024). Context-based problem-posing and solving instructional approach and students’ engagement in learning data handling. Cogent Education, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2389486
Türkkan, B. T., & Karakuş, M. (2021). The effect of mathematics instruction integrated with social issues on problem posing skill. Elementary Education Online, 20(1), 495–502. https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2021.01.043
Yalvac, B., Craig, C., Hill-Jackson, V., & Cole, C. (2023). Toward Inquiry and Problem Posing in Teacher Education. Journal of Teacher Education, 74(5), 417–421. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224871231202828
Yumiati, Y., & Haji, S. (2021). Improving monoid concept understanding ability through problem posing learning model at abstract algebra course. In A. G. Abdullah, M. L. Firdaus, I. Widiaty, A. B. D. Nandiyanto, A. A. Danuwijaya, & C. U. Abdullah (Eds.), Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1731, Issue 1). IOP Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1731/1/012047
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Asmar Bani, Norma Angkotasan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan is an Open Access Journal. The authors who publish the manuscript in Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan agree to the following terms.
Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0)
-
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
-
ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
- You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
- No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
