Motivation–Workload Paradox in Practice-Based Distance Learning: A Mixed-Methods Study at Indonesia Open University

Authors

  • Marisa Marisa Universitas Terbuka, Tangerang Selatan, Indonesia
  • Murni Maulina Universitas Terbuka, Tangerang Selatan, Indonesia
  • Muhammad Sulaiman Universitas Terbuka, Tangerang Selatan, Indonesia
  • Susy Puspitasari Universitas Terbuka, Tangerang Selatan, Indonesia
  • Dedy Aswan Universitas Terbuka, Tangerang Selatan, Indonesia
  • Mohamad Adning Pusdatin Kemendikdasmen, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Johana Nurkhalifah Universitas Terbuka, Tangerang Selatan, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21009/jtp.v28i1.62515

Keywords:

Practical courses, Distance Learning, Universitas Terbuka

Abstract

This study comprehensively explores the perceptions, experiences, and challenges faced by students in taking practical courses at the Faculty of Teacher Training and Education (FKIP), Universitas Terbuka (UT). Practical courses are frequently hampered and encounter obstacles in assignment completion. Employing a mixed-methods design with 307 participants from two study programs at Universitas Terbuka (UT), this research collected quantitative data (perceptions) and qualitative data (constraints). Descriptive quantitative results reveal a notable paradox: the majority of students reported high independent learning motivation (68% - 88%) and positive perceptions of lecturer guidance quality (82% - 97%). However, these findings contrast with the operational reality, where students overwhelmingly perceived the workload as high (above 90%). Thematic analysis of qualitative data identified three main constraints: time management due to work conflicts (33.7% in TPEN), technical constraints (internet network and learning platforms), and difficulties bridging theory and practice (47% in PBIN). It is concluded that the success of practical courses in distance learning is heavily influenced by external structural and logistical factors, such as learning environment stability and system design, which hinder the actualization of student motivation and self-regulation. Research implications recommend instructional design flexibility, workload adjustment, digital infrastructure strengthening, and the provision of multimodal materials (demonstration videos) to bridge the theory-practice gap. Theoretically, this study contributes by mapping how external structural limitations in distance education impede student self-regulation mechanisms despite high internal motivation.

References

Agus Pribadi, B., Ichwan, & Dicky A Purnama. (2022). ONLINE LEARNING BASED ON CONSTRUCTIVISM TO SUPPORT UNIVERSITAS TERBUKA DISTANT LEARNERS. Jurnal Teknodik, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.32550/teknodik.vi.978

Aldeeb, F. H., Sallabi, O. M., Elaish, M. M., & Hwang, G. (2024). Enhancing students’ learning achievements, self‐efficacy, and motivation using mobile augmented reality. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 40(4), 1823–1837. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12989

Bolkan, S., Goodboy, A. K., & Kelsey, D. M. (2016). Instructor Clarity and Student Motivation: Academic Performance as A Product of Students’ Ability and Motivation to Process Instructional Material. Communication Education, 65(2), 129–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2015.1079329

Budiarto, M. K., Khotimah, ⁠Khusnul, Maulana, I., Andrianto, R. E., Rabbani, A., Djatmiko, Syahmi, F. A., & Amarulloh, A. (2026). Interactive-Based Media and Effective Learning Strategies to Improve Students’ Digital Literacy: A Structured Literature Review. Journal of Teaching and Learning, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.22329/jtl.v20i1.9765

Burgess, M. (2023). Challenges for flexible distance learning professional acoustics education. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 154(4_supplement). https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0022925

Cronje, J. C. (2022). From face-to-face to Distance: Towards Flexibility in five Dimensions of Blended Learning: Lessons Learnt from the Covid-19 Pandemic. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 20(4). https://doi.org/10.34190/ejel.20.4.2201

El Azhari, K., Hilal, I., Daoudi, N., & Ajhoun, R. (2025). An Integrated AI Specification to Improve Distance Learning. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy (IJEP), 15(1), 41–55. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v15i1.51881

Enwereji, P. C., Van Rooyen, A., & Terblanche, A. (2023). Exploring Students’ Perceptions on Effective Online Tutoring at a Distance Education Institution. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 21(4), 366–381. https://doi.org/10.34190/ejel.21.4.3131

Fidan, M. (2023). The effects of microlearning-supported flipped classroom on pre-service teachers’ learning performance, motivation and engagement. Education and Information Technologies, 28(10). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11639-2

Gao, H. (2022). Online AI-Guided Video Extraction for Distance Education with Applications. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2022, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5028726

Getenet, S., Haeusler, C., Redmond, P., Cantle, R., & Crouch, V. (2024). First-year Preservice Teachers’ Understanding of Digital Technologies and Their Digital Literacy, Efficacy, Attitude, and Online Learning Engagement: Implication for Course Design. Technology, Knowledge and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-023-09724-z

Holmberg, B. (2005). Theory and Practice of Distance Education. In Theory and Practice of Distance Education. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203973820

Huang, C. S. J., Yang, S. J. H., Chiang, T. H. C., & Su, A. Y. S. (2016). Effects of Situated Mobile Learning Approach on Learning Motivation and Performance of EFL Students. 19, 263–276.

Iankova, V., Respondek, G., Saranza, G., Painous, C., Cámara, A., Compta, Y., Aiba, I., Balint, B., Giagkou, N., Josephs, K. A., Otsuki, M., Golbe, L. I., Bhatia, K. P., Stamelou, M., Lang, A. E., & Höglinger, G. U. (2020). Video-tutorial for the Movement Disorder Society criteria for progressive supranuclear palsy. Parkinsonism and Related Disorders, 78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parkreldis.2020.06.030

Ismail, S. N., Hamid, S., Ahmad, M., Alaboudi, A., & Jhanjhi, N. (2021). Exploring students engagement towards the learning management system (LMS) using learning analytics. Computer Systems Science and Engineering, 37(1), 73–87. https://doi.org/10.32604/CSSE.2021.015261

Iwasaki, C., Tada, Y., Furukawa, T., Sasaki, K., Yamada, Y., Nakazawa, T., & Ikezawa, T. (2019). Design of e-learning and online tutoring as learning support for academic writing. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal, 14(2), 85–96. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAOUJ-06-2019-0024

Lawson, T., & Comber, C. (2014). Videoconferencing and Learning in the Classroom: The Effects of Being an Orphan Technology? The International Journal of Technologies in Learning, 40(1).

Leontyeva, I. A. (2018). Modern Distance Learning Technologies in Higher Education: Introduction Problems. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(10). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/92284

Liu, C., & Elms, P. (2019). Animating student engagement: The impacts of cartoon instructional videos on learning experience. Research in Learning Technology, 27. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v27.2124

Mamun, M. A. Al, Lawrie, G., & Wright, T. (2020). Instructional design of scaffolded online learning modules for self-directed and inquiry-based learning environments. Computers and Education, 144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103695

McKee, C., & Ntokos, K. (2022). Online microlearning and student engagement in computer games higher education. Research in Learning Technology, 30. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v30.2680

Mokhtar, N. H., & Othman, Z. (2022). Communicative Skills Through Corporate Storytelling Video: Students’ Perception. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1302.04

Mukhlis, Rokhman, F., Zulaeha, I., & Mardikantoro, H. B. (2024). Optimization of Teachers’ Verbal Communication Rhetoric in Improving the Quality of Education Services. Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental, 18(5), e06267. https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v18n5-132

MUSLICHA, A. N. F. (2021). EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION FOR DISTANCE LEARNING. SIGEH ELT : Journal of Literature and Linguistics, 1(1), 76–86. https://doi.org/10.36269/sigeh.v1i1.370

Nozari, A. Y., & Siamian, H. (2015). The effect of applying podcast multimedia teaching system on motivational achievement and learning among the boy students. Acta Informatica Medica, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.5455/aim.2015.23.29-32

Nurmaliyah, F. (2014). Menurunkan stres akademik siswa dengan menggunakan teknik self-instruction. Jurnal Pendidikan Humaniora, 2(3), 273–282. http://journal.um.ac.id/index.php/jph

Pareek, R. (2024). Ensuring Quality in Online and Distance Learning Programs (pp. 343–374). https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-6915-9.ch014

Pratt, M., Boudhane, M., Taskin, N., & Cakula, S. (2021). Use of AI for Improving Employee Motivation and Satisfaction (pp. 289–299). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68201-9_30

Puhach, V. (2025). Psychological aspects of distance learning: motivation, self-organisation and support for students. Health and Safety Pedagogy, 10(1), 26–32. https://doi.org/10.31649/2524-1079-2025-10-1-026-032

Qin, Y., Huang, T., & Tang, G. (2022). Analysis of the Effect of Video-Guided Dance Creation for Young Children. Mobile Information Systems, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1110698

Queiroz, D. C. de, Nascimento, J. L. G. do, Nunes, P. H. de O., Gomes, A. M. P., Souza, J. T. de, & Oliveira, I. N. de. (2024). Artificial Intelligence in Education: An Overview of Distance Education Courses. Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental, 18(5), e08125. https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v18n5-169

Rini, R., Mujiyati, Sukamto, I., & Hariri, H. (2022). The Effect of Self-Directed Learning on Students’ Digital Literacy Levels in Online Learning. International Journal of Instruction, 15(3). https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15318a

Román-Sánchez, D., De-La-Fuente-Rodríguez, J. M., Paramio, A., Paramio-Cuevas, J. C., Lepiani-Díaz, I., & López-Millan, M. R. (2023). Evaluating satisfaction with teaching innovation, its relationship to academic performance and the application of a video-based microlearning. Nursing Open, 10(9). https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.1828

Seo, K., Dodson, S., Harandi, N. M., Roberson, N., Fels, S., & Roll, I. (2021). Active learning with online video: The impact of learning context on engagement. Computers and Education, 165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104132

Serednytska, A. (2025). Advantages and Disadvantages of Distance Education and Blended Learning as a Compromise Form of Education (pp. 693–701). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-84228-3_60

Siddique, I. M., Arde, R. A., & Siddique, A. A. (2024). The Future of Distance Learning: Streamlined Labs in Virtual Education. Journal of IoT and Machine Learning, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.48001/joitml.2024.1130-37

Sugden, N., Brunton, R., MacDonald, J. B., Yeo, M., & Hicks, B. (2021). Evaluating Student Engagement and Deep Learning in Interactive Online Psychology Learning Activities. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 37(2). https://doi.org/10.14742/AJET.6632

Swanson, A., Davis, B., Parks, O., Atkinson, S., Forde, B., & Choi, K. (2015). Student engagement, e-connectivity, and creating relationships in the online classroom: Emerging themes. International Journal of Instructional Technology & Distance Learning, 12(1), 66–73.

Vlachopoulos, D., & Makri, A. (2019). Online communication and interaction in distance higher education: A framework study of good practice. International Review of Education, 65(4), 605–632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-019-09792-3

Xiao, J. (2017). Learner-content interaction in distance education: The weakest link in interaction research. Distance Education, 38(1), 123–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2017.1298982

Yu, Z. (2022). Sustaining Student Roles, Digital Literacy, Learning Achievements, and Motivation in Online Learning Environments during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Sustainability, 14(8), 4388. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084388

Zhou, C., & Li, J. (2024). The development of aesthetic experience through virtual and augmented reality. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 4290. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-53840-4

Downloads

Published

2026-04-10

How to Cite

Marisa, M., Maulina, M., Sulaiman, M., Puspitasari, S., Aswan, D., Adning, M., & Nurkhalifah, J. (2026). Motivation–Workload Paradox in Practice-Based Distance Learning: A Mixed-Methods Study at Indonesia Open University. JTP - Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 28(1), 203–214. https://doi.org/10.21009/jtp.v28i1.62515