The Influence of Critical Thinking and Student Engagement on Learning Outcomes in Gamification-Based Vocational Education

Authors

  • Baiaturridwan Baiaturridwan Magister Program Technological Vocational Education, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Negeri Padang
  • Dedy Irfan Department of Electronics Engineering,Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Negeri Padang
  • Resmi Darni Department of Electronics Engineering,Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Negeri Padang
  • Muhammad Giatman Department of Civil Engineering,Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Negeri Padang

Keywords:

critical thinking, engagement, learning outcome, gamification, vocational education

Abstract

Vocational learning often faces challenges in fostering active student participation, particularly in practicum-based courses where more than 60% of students tend to be passively engaged during instructional activities, resulting in suboptimal learning outcomes. Therefore, an instructional approach that promotes active involvement is critically needed. This study aims to examine the role of critical thinking and student engagement in predicting learning outcomes within gamified vocational education, where gamification is positioned as a pedagogical approach rather than a statistical variable. This study employed a quantitative approach with an associative research design. The participants consisted of 22 students enrolled in a network programming practicum course, selected using a total sampling technique. Data were collected through Likert-scale questionnaires that met validity and reliability criteria (Cronbach’s Alpha ≥ 0.60). Data analysis was conducted using multiple linear regression with the assistance of SPSS software. The results indicate that critical thinking and engagement simultaneously have a significant effect on learning outcomes (p < 0.05), with a coefficient of determination (R² = 0.909), indicating a strong predictive model. Partially, engagement has a positive and significant effect on learning outcomes (p < 0.05), while critical thinking does not show a significant direct effect (p > 0.05), although it demonstrates a positive relationship. These findings suggest that the effectiveness of gamified vocational learning is more strongly influenced by student engagement as an active learning mechanism, rather than critical thinking as an independent factor.

References

Astin, A. W. (1999). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Development, 40(5), 518–529.

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315456539

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications.

Facione, P. A. (2011). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts. Insight Assessment.

Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). Sage Publications.

Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059

Ghozali, I. (2018). Aplikasi analisis multivariate dengan program IBM SPSS 25 (9th ed.). Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.

Halpern, D. F. (2014). Thought and knowledge: An introduction to critical thinking (5th ed.). Psychology Press.

Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203887332

Kapp, K. M. (2012). The gamification of learning and instruction: Game-based methods and strategies for training and education. Pfeiffer.

Kuh, G. D. (2009). What student affairs professionals need to know about student engagement. Journal of College Student Development, 50(6), 683–706. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.0.0099

Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 22(140), 1–55.

Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223–231. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x

Resnick, L. B. (1987). Education and learning to think. National Academy Press.

Schunk, D. H., Meece, J. L., & Pintrich, P. R. (2014). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications (4th ed.). Pearson Education.

Skinner, E. A., Kindermann, T. A., & Furrer, C. J. (2009). A motivational perspective on engagement and disaffection. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69(3), 493–525. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164408323233

Sugiyono. (2019). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2019). Using multivariate statistics (7th ed.). Pearson Education.

Zainuddin, Z., Chu, S. K. W., Shujahat, M., & Perera, C. J. (2020). The impact of gamification on learning and instruction: A systematic review of empirical evidence. Educational Research Review, 30, 100326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100326

Zepke, N., & Leach, L. (2010). Improving student engagement. Teaching in Higher Education, 15(2), 167–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562511003620056

Published

2026-04-30

How to Cite

Baiaturridwan, B., Dedy Irfan, Resmi Darni, & Muhammad Giatman. (2026). The Influence of Critical Thinking and Student Engagement on Learning Outcomes in Gamification-Based Vocational Education. JTP - Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 28(1). Retrieved from https://journal.unj.ac.id/unj/index.php/jtp/article/view/66419

Issue

Vol. 28 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan

Section

Full Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Baiaturridwan Baiaturridwan, Dedy Irfan, Resmi Darni, Muhammad Giatman

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan is an Open Access Journal. The authors who publish the manuscript in Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan agree to the following terms.

Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0)

  • Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.

  • ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.

  • No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

Notices:

 

  • You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
  • No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.